User talk:ZooBlazer

Real life is getting to me so I'm going to be on a wikibreak for a while. I won't be able to continue my peer review on Horizon Zero Dawn for the foreseeable future. I'm sorry. Good luck. toby ^{(t)(c)(rw)(omo)} 18:53, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Tarlby, I hope it is a good wikibreak. I was just wondering, if the FAC is still open after your break, would you want do a review for it? -- ZooBlazer 07:00, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Most likely not, sorry. It seems like you're getting supports though. Congrats! toby ^{(t)(c)(rw)(omo)} 17:59, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Why did you revert my page. I deleted the box of box office mojo link because the Numbers seemed more accurate. Iacowriter (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

@Iacowriter Well, you didn't specify why. Your edit summary was Got get rid of Box Office Mojo link. It's also probably something to bring up on the article's talk page before removing anyway. -- ZooBlazer 05:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

I apologize for that. I’ll try again. Iacowriter (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Three has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Aloy in Horizon Forbidden West.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thunderjaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderjaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ZooBlazer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Harvest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey, since you expressed an interest in working on video game characters, would you be at all interested in joining a private Discord used to talk about (though not exclusively) video game character article improvement? Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:26, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

@Cukie Gherkin Not sure I'd add much at the moment since I mostly just have plans for one character article. -- ZooBlazer 22:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Fair enough, but the offer's open if you change your mind Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2026 (UTC)