User talk:Jamescopperfieldd

Thanks for your contributions to Georgy Chervinsky (2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it is a copypaste of the declined draft Draft:Georgy Chervinsky in violation of WP:COPYWITHIN, and its formatting is a bit of a mess with two separate references sections.

Please edit the previously existing draft, and when you believe it is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 14:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There are quite a few things that need changing here. Here are some to start with, but there are other issues.

1) Is the subject really notable? See WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC. 2) If so then we need reliable sources for every point that can be questioned. 3) In particular Facebook and IMDb can't be used, see WP:RSP

4) This is an encyclopedia, so a crisp summary of someone's life and career. At the moment the wording isn't very encyclopedic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pavel Kizhuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Jamescopperfieldd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 19:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for checking it out. I'm new here, but I figured it out quickly. I've seen a lot of articles with both YouTube links and published articles. Regarding importance, this man definitely developed Greek culture in Russia, which is no easy feat, and it actually yielded fruit, an award from the president. I don't understand your question about significance.Sorry. Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 19:46, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Chrys,it's like a naturalist and an archaeologist, only in the modern world. Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello Jamescopperfieldd! Your additions to Draft:Pavel Kizhuk have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeoGaze (talk) 20:43, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Pavel Kizhuk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sugar Tax (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I'll try to be more attentive. Thanks! Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgy_Chervinsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 10:02, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey, User:RangersRus!) This article has been in draft form for quite some time. Please check the sources; they are reputable.

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Athanelar was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft is massively overcited with references that don't help to establish notability (like simple cast credit references on IMDB). Please review WP:42 for what we're looking for in a source; for instance, the first source in his 'Career' section is a link to a bio about him on Plex, which is not a reliable source as it is likely user-generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pavel Kizhuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Athanelar (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey!

Thank you for your consideration of my request. The sources are independent and much more credible than some magazines. Are you looking for an article on the White House website? I believe there's a personal grudge against you, nothing more. There are more than enough sources of varying significance. I look forward to your comment, and thank you again.

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

It's a vicious circle: one claims the biography is similar to the IMDB biography, another claims IMDB is a poor source, even though it's a global database. How can it be a weak source? This is all based on personal beliefs, which is unacceptable for an encyclopedia of this caliber.

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 15:55, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

It is not at all based on personal beliefs, Wikipedia does not consider IMDB to be a reliable source because its content is user-generated. Athanelar (talk) 17:02, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

But brother, imdb is not the only source, there are plenty of others. I would understand you if there was only one source, imdb, right?If you can, please tell me what source would be suitable for an artist of this level?

I found an interview in a magazine; he's listed in international databases, meaning he's recognized. He's listed as an artist at the Greek Cultural Center and is included in a Russian cyclopedia. He's from a Belarusian village, so these sources are sufficient to confirm his achievements.Sorry to bother you, but I am writing the truth.

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

As I said in my decline notice, please review WP:42 for details on what makes a good source for notability. Athanelar (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

This article has already been discussed on a similar topic, and it's been answered. I think you're blind. I need to ask someone with more sight for help. There's an independent source from the Greek Cultural Center and the official Kremlin website. Everything else is just a bonus.

I'm sorry, but you're wrong.

With,regads Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

You are welcome to resubmit it and wait for somebody else to review it if you disagree with my review. Athanelar (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

You have every right to do so, and thank you again for reading the article. I'll try to find more reliable sources.

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Likeanechointheforest. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pavel Kizhuk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey!

Nice to meet you! Thank you for reading this article. I've fixed all the previous issues and will try to improve it.

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 20:06, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavel Kizhuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Kizhuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ChompyTheGogoat (talk) 06:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jamescopperfieldd! I'm UtherSRG, and I've been assigned as your mentor. All new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! UtherSRG (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, thank you! Honestly, I already wasted a lot of time creating an article that they want to delete... I'll try eating some cookies...))

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SocDoneLeft was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please rewrite using encyclopedia prose. Bad example: "He grew up in a preschool orphanage in Leningrad — and really wanted to get an education not in vocational school — because all the children orphanage from the vocational school went to prison." Then resubmit. :)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgy Chervinsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SocDoneLeft (talk) 00:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed comment! I'll try to edit it later.

With regads, Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 06:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 16:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your continued disruption was not productive nor amusing. As such you've lost access to edit. Star Mississippi 16:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

How rude. Big Brother sees everything. I didn't come here to entertain you. Jamescopperfieldd (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)