User talk:Jibblesnark86

Jibblesnark86 is currently feeling discouraged about Wikipedia and is taking an off-and-on wikibreak due to loss of motivation.

Your help in cheering this user up would be appreciated.

They will return when their wikistress has dissipated and their confidence in the wikicommunity has been restored.

Jibblesnark86 is currently experiencing mental health issues, which may affect their Wikipedia editing in various ways. They may have:

altered perception when making editorial judgements, determining consensus, or reading Wikipedia discussions addressed to them;
reduced availability on Wikipedia during times when they experience issues;
limited capacity to respond to other Wikipedians via talk page or email messages in a timely fashion, to participate in conflict resolution, or to complete their usual workload of Wikipedia tasks.

Thank you for your understanding.

Notice: I'm currently feeling a bit depressed and discouraged to do any major edits on Wikipedia due to a user falsely accusing me of deception and harassment, which is obviously not me, and I do not condone anything of the such and sort. Because of this, I won't be doing that much editing on here for now; maybe a few edits here and there. To anyone who stumbles upon this, I hope you understand. Thank you.

Status: Offline

Welcome! This is my talk page. If you have any questions, comments, concerns, etc., please start a topic here by clicking "Add Topic" and I will try to resolve situations or answer questions.
Remember to also sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Please remember to stay civil and please refrain from any form of attacking or other unacceptable behavior. Thank you for coming.

File:Sosumi.mp3 listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sosumi.mp3, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GreenC 02:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Jibblesnark86, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the tea and cookies, they're great! I'm happy to be here!

Jibblesnark86 (talk) 05:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bloom (Lewis Capaldi EP) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sksatsuma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although charting is one of the alternative criteria for notability, as the EP itself didn't chart, this doesn't qualify. Additionally, notability isn't inherited, ie even though the songs may be notable, that doesn't necessarily establish that the EP itself is.

Therefore this would need to be assessed against WP:GNG. I would suggest finding more indpendent, reliable sources which discuss the topic in depth (for example your Clash magazine reference would fulfil this criteria).

Reviews are often a good source for musical releases, especially for a well established and notable artist such as Capaldi.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bloom (Lewis Capaldi EP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

sk satsuma 15:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jibblesnark86! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! sk satsuma 15:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

I don’t know if you can help with this, but I couldn’t find any reviews that could have been in the article, but maybe I overlooked. Could you please help me find some reviews for Bloom?

Thanks,

Jibblesnark86 (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bloom (Lewis Capaldi EP) has been accepted

Bloom (Lewis Capaldi EP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 09:56, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: I Am (Tom Walker album) has been accepted

I Am (Tom Walker album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Minute, a Moment... has been accepted

A Minute, a Moment..., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:42, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dancing, Alone has been accepted

Dancing, Alone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Modern Day Distraction has been accepted

A Modern Day Distraction, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Frost 10:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Best Day of My Life (album) has been accepted

Best Day of My Life (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 19:54, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Simple Trick (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM, needs significant coverage about the album, not the various singles. Noting Musicbrainz, Spotify, YouTube, and Apple Music are not acceptable or reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Simple Trick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:26, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Simple Trick (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As previously stated in order to address WP:NALBUM, there needs to be significant coverage about the album, not the preceding EPS or singles. In the background section there is a significant amount of original research (i.e. material without any references or sources). The Rock'n'Load article appears to be a press release rather than a review (primary source). The Sputnik reference is just a collection of user reviews not professional reviews. Needs to find better references/reviews before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Simple Trick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:32, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greatest Hits Live (Steve Winwood album) has been accepted

Greatest Hits Live (Steve Winwood album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 04:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Iron Lung

TheMovieGuy is wrong. I restored the quote. If he removes it again, feel free to restore it. Sorry you have to put up with that nonsense. It's not the first problem edit by TheMovieGuy. Sundayclose (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, and it's all good. It doesn't really bother me. I'm glad you understand though. Thanks again. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 00:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Laurent Brancowitz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Laurent Brancowitz. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: In Space with Markiplier (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The notability guideline for films generally requires at least two full-length reviews (which excludes other kinds of coverage, such as reporting on a film's announcement or launch). At the moment you only have one review in a student newspaper, which are typically not presumed to be reliable sources for things outside of their local community. Are there any professional reviews of this film that you could cite?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In Space with Markiplier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 15:26, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurent Brancowitz (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ortizesp was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more secondary coverage about Laurent Brancowitz himself, not Phoenix.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laurent Brancowitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ortizesp (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jibblesnark86!

Happy New Year!

Jibblesnark86,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 16:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 16:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

And a happy new year to you and yours as well! I hope 2026 brings so much joy! Jibblesnark86 (talk) 22:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Jibblesnark86!

Happy New Year!

Jibblesnark86,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy new year! I hope this year is full of rememberable moments! Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benjamin Hav, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BT and TV 2. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BTS: Yet to Come in Cinemas has been accepted

BTS: Yet to Come in Cinemas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 14:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BTS: Bon Voyage has been accepted

BTS: Bon Voyage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 20:12, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehdi Maïzi (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are all interviews or not in-depth enough(believe me, I checked) though given the amount of coverage on the article so far I wouldn't be surprised if there are notability-establishing sources out there

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mehdi Maïzi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 21:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

https://www.jeuneafrique.com/mag/481381/culture/parcours-mehdi-maizi-lexpert-de-la-maison-rap/ - interview, stuff like "he told us while joking." etc

https://etudiant.lefigaro.fr/article/sans-le-rap-je-serais-surement-consultant-mehdi-maizi-apple-music-france-raconte-son-parcours_50afbdee-e01b-11ec-bf0b-2472e1a8040c/ - interview: "confie-t-il, avant de nous raconter son parcours."

https://video.lefigaro.fr/figaro/passe-par-une-ecole-de-commerce-et-une-classe-preparatoire-mehdi-maizi-nous-raconte-son-parcours-20220601 - video interview

https://www.liberation.fr/culture/musique/mehdi-maizi-bon-iver-ma-toujours-deprime-20230114_WVVAOXAJKZFT5GMQBQRUCOC3LI/ - interview

https://www.streetpress.com/sujet/1464085699-mehdi-maizi-rap-abcdr-oklm-portrait - not too sure, seems to be based off an interview at second glance and not an actual interview

https://www.programme-tv.net/news/evenement/podcasts-emissions/215557-le-podcaster-de-la-semaine-mehdi-maizi-animateur-de-nofun/ - pretty cut and dry interview

https://www.slate.fr/story/101337/hip-hop-francais-eternelle-jeunesse - not an interview but not in-depth

https://business.ladn.eu/news-business/actualites-media/medias-podcast-deezer-lance-speakeasy-de-mehdi-maizi/ - ditto the above, not in-depth enough

https://www.programme-tv.net/news/tv/215172-balance-ton-post-c8-eric-revel-ramous-mehdi-maizi-qui-sont-les-chroniqueurs-de-la-nouvelle-emission-de-cyril-hanouna/ - also not in-depth

https://www.abcdrduson.com/sidekicks/deezer-releve/ - not in-depth

https://www.radiofrance.fr/mouv/deezer-annonce-la-sortie-de-sa-compil-la-releve-2-3699701 - ditto, not in-depth

https://www.radiofrance.fr/mouv/pourquoi-red-bull-est-si-present-dans-le-rap-francais-6101928 - seems to be an interview, "Est-ce que les participants sont obligés de boire sur le plateau ? "Pas du tout, répond Mehdi Maïzi"

https://www.redbull.com/en-us/rap-jeu-filming-behind-the-scenes - dead link

https://www.redbull.com/ch-fr/mehdi-maizi-quotidien-journaliste-rap - interview/vlog?

https://www.01net.com/actualites/apple-music-lance-le-code-sa-premiere-emission-francaise-consacree-au-hip-hop-1929978.html - not in-depth, half of it is just context

https://generations.fr/news/culture-et-societe/64116/rap-jeu-de-societe-la-date-de-sortie - not in-depth

https://intrld.com/mehdi-maizi-annonce-son-depart-de-rap-jeu/ - I would argue not in-depth enough but might establish notability. however it kinda echos routine coverage

https://stuffmagazine.fr/2022/10/31/apple-music-presente-le-code-review/ - seems to be an interview/exclusive quotes, "« Le Code Review sera un show bimensuel qui nous permettra de réagir à tête reposée sur les faits marquants de l’actualité rap », explique Mehdi Maïzi, head of hip-hop chez Apple Music France et animateur du CODE. "

https://www.radiofrance.fr/mouv/mehdi-maizi-lache-son-premier-morceau-rap-sur-le-projet-zzccmxtp-5214413 - not in-depth, just about a single - plus it seems he works there. strike all the radiofrance sources, it seems he has a podcast there

https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceinter/podcasts/a-la-reguliere - his podcast

https://www.telerama.fr/radio/mehdi-maizi-dans-a-la-reguliere-le-soir-sur-france-inter-du-rap-et-bien-plus-encore-7027714.php - interview, "« J’ai toujours fait ça, même quand je ne connais pas mes interlocuteurs, c’est mon style », reconnaît-il, précisant au passage qu’on lui a fait comprendre qu’on n’attendait pas de lui qu’il « enfile un autre costume et joue à l’animateur d’Inter »."

I really don't think notability is established by these sources monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 22:54, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

of course, since you're semiconfirmed you can just.. move the article to mainspace. Nobody's stopping you, and I'd wager that this article has a pretty good chance of surviving AfD monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh, ok. I must have been mistaken, these are interviews AND a dead link. Thank you for your reply. As I said, I think I'm gonna hold off for now, but as you said, since I am semiconfirmed, maybe later on, I'll think about probably moving the article to mainspace. Fingers crossed hoping it survives AfD if I do. Thank you again for elaborating on this. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Butcher's Creek has been accepted

Butcher's Creek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MightyRanger (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jibblesnark86. Thank you for your work on Butcher's Creek. Another editor, Justiyaya, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

You might want to use https://www.polygon.com/gaming/519184/butchers-creek-review-steam-david-szymanski/ as an additional source. Article looks good!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Justi yaya 07:36, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mouloud Achour (French-Algerian journalist) has been accepted

Mouloud Achour (French-Algerian journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jô^hola 13:53, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tron: Maze-A-Tron has been accepted

Tron: Maze-A-Tron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 15:29, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Kick and Run

Would you be able to help out with this draft? It was submitted for AFC by another user but it's not ready yet. The bibliography at the bottom lists two more sources that I don't have and there may be more sources in Japanese and the top of the draft mentions an Italian version of the article. ~2026-62874-9 (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Of course, whenever I have time, I'll be glad to help. Thanks for asking. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

OK that would be great, anything you can do! ~2026-62874-9 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Great Football. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism § Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 08:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Barnstar 4 You!

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Just wanted to send this for all your good work on Wikipedia, cheers! Eric Carpenter (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Aw, sweet, my first barnstar! Thank you so much! Just trying to help out whenever I can! Jibblesnark86 (talk) 17:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome!! Eric Carpenter (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diamond Rush (video game) (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It does seem notable, but a lot of the sources don't seem reliable. I'd recommend incorporating this magazine review into it (it's in Bulgarian, but you should be able to use translation), and it ought to pass GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diamond Rush (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:43, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for reviewing this, though I just wanna know, which sources in particular don't seem reliable, that way I'll know in the future? Please leave your comment anywhere that I can see. Thank you. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladimir Cauchemar (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Namita Tudu was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladimir Cauchemar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Namita Tudu (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Vladimir Cauchemar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vladimir Cauchemar. Thanks! Namita Tudu (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

A New Barnstar 4 U!

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		Thanks so very much for your continued help! Eric Carpenter (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Always happy to help! Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diamond Rush (video game) has been accepted

Diamond Rush (video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ASUKITE 17:55, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Patrick Cohen

hi there, can you tell me where this page has come from? Is it translated from somewhere else? JMWt (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Go to the talk page, you'll see that I translated it from the French Wikipedia article. Thanks for asking. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

ok. Do you speak French? Did you use an LLM? JMWt (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I speak it at a moderate level, though I'm still learning. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:13, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

so you used machine translation? Did you check all the references? JMWt (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I did not use machine translation, and I did check all the references. But if I did do something wrong, please tell me now. I'll understand. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

yeah, you can't just import references like that. Each one needs to be checked for relevance and the details need to be verified by you or removed. See WP:RS and WP:TRANSLATION and WP:LLMT. JMWt (talk) 20:18, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Yikes, I know I checked all of them. Should I remove this article and take it back to the sandbox to try again? And another question, are you a reviewer/monitor of pages like this? Just curious. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

a bunch of them say things like "Retrieved 17 March 2018" which is simply not possible when you have started a page on en.wiki in 2026. JMWt (talk) 20:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh ok I get it now. Just two questions: are you a page reviewer/monitor, and is this article in trouble if I don't fix this? Please answer these questions. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 20:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Patrick Cohen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Cohen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Cohen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 14:20, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Mouloud Achour (French-Algerian journalist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mouloud Achour (French-Algerian journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouloud Achour (French-Algerian journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davide Soliani has been accepted

Davide Soliani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 16:51, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Stop

stop communicating with me. Any further repeated messages will be reported as harrassment. I have given you a chance to get this out of your system, now you need to stop. JMWt (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Ok. Fine. I’m sorry if I caused harm, which, I never meant to if I somehow did. I just feel so downgraded by this, and I never got a single answer about this, or from you in general. But I’m assuming you don’t want to get into that info or, really, just don’t wanna talk. So if you don’t wanna answer, then fine. And I’ll stop too. I hope you understand. And once again, I’m terribly sorry. Jibblesnark86 (talk) 06:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles