User talk:Jlherman324

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 04:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I commented on the talk section and now can't even see the comment. What happened to it? Jlherman324 (talk) 05:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I removed your comment since you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days to edit in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict topic area. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Is there a way for you to retrieve it and send it to me -- I spent a lot of time writing it Jlherman324 (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Absolutely. You can find your comment here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AZionism&diff=1240209875&oldid=1240086144 - IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Final question -- if I have suggestions that would improve a controversial article but don't have 500 edits -- what is the best way to communicate them? Jlherman324 (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Find an EC editor willing to do it for you. (By which I mean, do it in their own name, not merely relay your opinion). Selfstudier (talk) 08:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

You may find WP:EDITXY useful. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jlherman324, refer to WP:ER. That is the only acceptable method for your to post on article talk pages that are in the WP:ARBPIA topic area, until you have 500 edits. TarnishedPath^talk 09:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rachel Wainer Apter, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snickers2686 (talk) 03:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Why did you not find it constructive? (Admittedly I made a mistake on the name of her spouse and have now fixed it) Jlherman324 (talk) 04:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Seeing you reverted the correct name as well, I'm curious what your objection was? Jlherman324 (talk) 04:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Montana Tucker. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Jlherman324. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Montana Tucker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jlherman324. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Montana Tucker".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:28, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Longhornsg. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Longhornsg (talk) 23:39, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I restored the edit and provided the reference. Jlherman324 (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

No you didn't. You provided a source, not a source supporting everything what you want to add. Do not revert my edit again. Add sources. Please familizarize yourself with WP:BLP and WP:RS. Longhornsg (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I did. Please read it -- around the 10th paragraph -- "He asked, she answered: On Horn's 22nd birthday, April 28, Schulman told her they were going out to dinner but didn't say where. That evening he came to her door with 22 roses--and an envelope." Her birthday is identified as April 28 in the Harvard Crimson. Jlherman324 (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

I see you have now reverted another of my edits on a different page saying again to add a source -- this time there was a clear source there. Jlherman324 (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2026 (UTC)