User talk:Soybean46

Hello, I'm TheoCourt. I noticed that you recently removed content from Silesian Interurbans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theo(talk) 20:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Theo, replied on your talk page. Either respond here or on your page. Kmlbon (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Congratulations on your work on this page. Can I just clear up a minor point. In the historical section you refer to the two pairs of trams used for the centenary service as follows: "Their fleet numbers were 2210 together with the towing car 1202 and the pair 2110 with the towing car 1522." I assume this refers to tram and trailer combinations, if correct can you confirm which is the power car and which is the trailer in each pairing? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

The first numbers are power cars with the latter numbers being the trailers. I appreciate all the cleanups, good to have a second pair of eyes. Kmlbon (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Most – Litvínov Trams, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

I will attempt to find references in Czech however it is unlikely there will be many references; at least I couldn't find much and it was a work in progress. I think your judgement has been too harsh in this instance. There are many articles on Wikipedia where references are widely available. The article is mainly a succinct translation from the Czech Wikipedia with context carefully checked, and could be judged as a Start Class article. I have added some references; the only ones I could find for the timebeing. Please reconsider, I have submitted the draft for review, and will amend the article with references when I can find them Kmlbon (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

If there are no sources confirming a statement presented as a fact in an article, then it fails WP:V and should probably be removed. You had 8000+ bytes/850 words in that article, and not a single source. Sorry but draftifying that is nowhere near being harsh. You have submitted it for review with four sources. Although better than nothing, a majority of the draft is still unsourced. This also the same with Trams in Ostrava. The burden is on you to show references for material you add. Of course others can help you with that, but in this case, I don't speak a word Czech. If you are struggling to find sources, you can perhaps ask for help at WikiProject Czech Republic or the village pump on cswiki. However, I did find some English sources on the trams of Ostrava written by academics: , , which I'd strongly recommend using over shady websites. ~Styyx^Talk? 15:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

There are millions of current articles on Wikipedia that wouldn't pass WP:V and you want to remove a translated article that is a work in progress - what is your angle here? The only thing I can admit to not knowing is the Draft function! Kmlbon (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Trams in Plzeň, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I removed the PROD from the talk page, it doesn't belong there and deleting the article would not be appropriate in this case anyway. I advise you to simply create the new article and merge the content of Liberec-Jablonec tramway into it (assuming this idea has consensus), then replace the content of that article with a redirect to the other. This is necessary to preserve attribution in the page history. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks Kmlbon (talk) 12:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UEFA Euro 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Siebert. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Without proper coverage, there is no need for a long list of DLC and updates. The developer's own website is no reason for inclusion. And WP:WHATABOUTX is not an argument. The WP:BURDEN is on you. Please come up with reliable sources. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

It kind of is! Why aren't you removing DLC content from the Cities Skylines page? Aren't those updates? Or do you lack understanding of the problem at hand? Or are you just unfair and lazy? Soybean46 (talk) 11:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Again, you suggesting WP:WHATABOUTX is not an argument. Please refrain from making personal attacks. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

I still do not like how we left this, perhaps we can come to a compromise. The DLC section completely omits any map updates, how is that acceptable? What rule can you claim this comes under? This isn't a walkthrough, a cheat, list of a game content, or detailed instructions on how to play a game. Soybean46 (talk) 23:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

I will claim one rule, and claim that all my edits were done in WP:AFG Soybean46 (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Furthermore, you haven't even referred to my edits on the Euro Truck Simulator 2 page, instead, you thanked me for my contributions, but failed to acknowledge the issue at hand. Yes, the developer's own source is a primary source (admittedly, I am still learning SIGCOV) but this is no reason to fire down my contributions. Soybean46 (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

If I may, perhaps I am too connected to the topic because I played the video game ... but, the DLC Map Updates are relevant because the introduction section should at least should mention them per WP:MoS Soybean46 (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I see that you recently created many articles without citing any sources. This shouldn't be done, as all articles should reference reliable sources, both to verify the claims they make and to show they pass the general notability guideline. If you want, Help:Referencing for beginners can be helpful. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Well, surely sources can be added as the article progresses? Soybean46 (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Things you write should be sourced. It is not the job of other editors in the future to source them "as the article progresses", especially when you are creating a large number of articles successively. Also, not having sources means new page reviewers can't know if your articles are fit for mainspace.

Writing one well-sourced article is more productive than 10 unsourced articles, and the latter can even become a burden on other editors and the encyclopedia. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Rai Friuli Venezia Giulia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to ČRo Vltava. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Petőfi Rádió. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lee Burridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Travellers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Soybean46. Thank you for your work on Tatra 607 Monopost. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources aren't enough to satisfy WP:GNG, and it's not clear how this would meet WP:MUSICBIO either?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paavo Siljamäki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Siljamaki was nominated for a Grammy with the Above & Beyond band, but not as a solo performer, necessarily, per WP:MUSICBIO. There is also no original research, whilst the references are scarce, I think this qualifies for at least a stub. Is there anything I can improve on? Soybean46 (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I share the concerns of the previous reviewer. This interview source is very detailed; the rest are are not.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paavo Siljamäki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Appreciate the second opinion, I have nothing to add to the current draft, unless anyone else does Soybean46 (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Česká pošta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

D3 motorway (Czech Republic)

added a link pointing to Expressway

Trams in Prague

added a link pointing to Anděl

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Petőfi Rádió, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ČRo České Budějovice, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rai Friuli Venezia Giulia".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Petőfi Rádió".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "ČRo České Budějovice".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James May and The Dull Men's Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "James May and The Dull Men's Club".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Soybean46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ČRo Radiožurnál Sport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buses in Prague, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ikarus was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Prague into Transport in Prague. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:28, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

In future, I will adhere to this - however, how can I attribute the original content considering it is part of the first edit on the new page? Soybean46 (talk) 14:36, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

There should be an edit summary field when you create a new page. If you don't see an edit summary field, do it on a subsequent edit to the page. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Line A (Prague Metro), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nádraží Veleslavín was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Aegean Airlines into Transport in Greece. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:25, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, will be more careful next time! Soybean46 (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2026 (UTC)