User talk:Krhinestone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 2026
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Christian observance of Passover, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Harryb7 (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, can you explain why you don't think that my edits were constructive? I put a lot of effort into those and don't appreciate them being reverted. Krhinestone (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Of course - your edits seemed to, in part, edit neutral language already present in the article into non-encyclopaedic and potentially biased language. Your new edits are much better and appear to get your intended points across while appearing more neutral. My comment wasn’t an indication that you have done anything ‘wrong’, just that care always needs to be taken with contentious topics like this one. Thank you for your contributions! Harryb7 (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- I should also note that the article has been marked for merging into a different one (details can be found at the top of the article), so rather than editing it directly it would be better (if you have time) to move the content you are adding to the target article instead. Harryb7 (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- I did look at the instructions for doing that, but it is beyond my skillset at this time. Krhinestone (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate that! Krhinestone (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- I should also note that the article has been marked for merging into a different one (details can be found at the top of the article), so rather than editing it directly it would be better (if you have time) to move the content you are adding to the target article instead. Harryb7 (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Of course - your edits seemed to, in part, edit neutral language already present in the article into non-encyclopaedic and potentially biased language. Your new edits are much better and appear to get your intended points across while appearing more neutral. My comment wasn’t an indication that you have done anything ‘wrong’, just that care always needs to be taken with contentious topics like this one. Thank you for your contributions! Harryb7 (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Welcome!
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source. Do not use AI-generated text.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.