User talk:Kristianpaul

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SHPEGS, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.redferret.net/?p=9049. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

The article SHPEGS has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article was a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate. Under that specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article previously deleted after such a debate, it may be deleted again at any time.

For the relevant prior discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHPEGS. — Satori Son 19:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben NanoNote is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben NanoNote until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 11:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

The project is no longer running , the article should be kept for historical reasons Kristianpaul (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Namuru. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

intendedI used an LLM for wikipedia formatting but is fixed now since there was information not intented to be there.

If you have a recomendations on how to fix wikipedia formating without llm use let me know Kristianpaul (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TonySt. I noticed that you recently removed content from M-Labs without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. tony 00:17, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

the removed content was part of the article self promotion Kristianpaul (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ScalarFactor, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Namuru to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ScalarFactor (talk) 00:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Kristianpaul! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ScalarFactor (talk) 00:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, finally an encouraging message here Kristianpaul (talk) 16:23, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

The article Namuru has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not ready for mainspace. Article was recreated after being moved to Draft:Namuru, so recreated article is technically a WP:DRAFTOBJECT; I'd encourage the creator to continue working on the draft, and submit it to AfC once it's ready.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. nil ^nz 04:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Kristian, I've prodded this as I don't believe it is ready for mainspace yet. This won't affect the copy of it at Draft:Namuru, which I'd encourage you to continue improving. When it's ready, clicking submit will send it to AfC, where it will be reviewed by an experienced editor. Happy editing! nil ^nz 04:25, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

You can deleted it just was trying to submit a work done on the open hardware. If have time before its deleted i will try improving the article Kristianpaul (talk) 05:14, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Cheers Kristian, I've updated the tag. Please feel free to continue working on it at Draft:Namuru. nil ^nz 05:24, 15 April 2026 (UTC)