User talk:MarSteGeo

This edit you made to Ram Mandir moved File:Shri Ram Janambhoomi Mandir, Ayodhya Dham.jpg into the infobox. I have therefore removed the image from the body of the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zalaraz (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Which page you are talking about ? MarSteGeo (talk) 01:09, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Which page is not constructive ? Everything is sourced and constructive and with guidelines of Wikipedia. Explain specific page you are talking about? MarSteGeo (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

I am talking about your edits to Ram Mandir. Zalaraz (talk) 02:24, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Ohh. I have started a discussion there. MarSteGeo (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramayana in popular culture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramayana in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Economy of Uttar Pradesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:45, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please do not change headings for "Factual accuracy and political messaging". You were also told by another editor who previously reverted your change. After many discussion this was put in place. RangersRus (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Which particular one you are talking about ? MarSteGeo (talk) 01:17, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhurandhar: The Revenge, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overseas was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi! We don't cherry-pick sources. See WP:ICTFMOS and WP:ICTFSOURCES Sid95Q (talk) 05:53, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Aditya Dhar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sajid Nadiadwala, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baaghi was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Nuclear triad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please do not remove large swathes of reliably sourced content without consensus. Your behavior on this article and others is concerning -- you removed large amounts of sourced content as "needs reliable sources" without explanation; you've changed text away from what it's paired sourcing says in ways that are unsupported, and this appears to be done in order to push a POV regarding Pakistan's standing as a nuclear triad power. You are reminded that this area is designated a contentious topic (for which you were previously alerted here): editors are expected to seek consensus and edit constructively in this topic space, at risk of sanctions. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dev Anand, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewel Thief was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rahil1610 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahil1610. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  TonyBallioni (talk) 04:50, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

I am not suckpuppet of anyone. unblock me MarSteGeo (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Please address the evidence/similarities as presented in the SPI. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:57, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

I checked that and that doesn't prove i am someone's sockpuppet. I replied to a talk page of Narendra Modi and suddenly got blocked. As if only bunch of people are allowed to talk about some pages. I am not that rahil or whatever. MarSteGeo (talk) 01:38, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra Please check. I am not a sockpuppet. MarSteGeo (talk) 11:06, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry. Unconvincing. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:58, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra What should i do convice. Just after a reply in Narendra Modi talk page, i suddenly got blocked. Well, even Larry Sanger got blocked recently. What can even i do. Please look into this. I am not Rahil whoever he she was MarSteGeo (talk) 10:21, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

MarSteGeo, you asked what you could do to convince people that you are not Rahil. I found (a) some of the diff comparisons 100% convincing, and (b) some merely suggestive of similarities. From what I can see you are only blocked on English-language Wikipedia. My advice is to go for WP:STANDARDOFFER. Edit articles in another language Wikipedia for at least six months; during this time make substantial contributions: i.e. really improve articles, discuss problems on article talk pages instead of edit warring, leave meaningful edit summaries - i.e. be the kind of editor that Wikipedia wants. Be open on your user page on that language about your having been blocked on English-language Wikipedia as a suspected sock-puppet - if you like you can say that there were similarities between your edits and Rahil's but that you deny being Rahil. Ask for an unblock here in 2027 - preferably after new Rahil socks have been found - you can highlight the differences in behaviour between your edits (on the other Wikipedia) and theirs.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

@Toddy1 I have works to do, i was using and editing Wikipedia as a passion. Wikipedia doesn't pay me to waste my time here that i have to wait till Wikipedia mob catch Rahil only then i can enter again. What if Rahil never came.

Even Larry Sanger got blocked and threw away because he raised valid points of bias in Indian and Hindutva pages in an Indian media interview, It certainly proved the point that neutrality is nowhere in Wikipedia. MarSteGeo (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2026 (UTC)