User talk:Martin-Palmet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cenos Simulation Software (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sophisticatedevening were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sophisticatedevening (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Martin-Palmet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Martin-Palmet, welcome to Wikipedia! I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Cenos Simulation Software to Articles for creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia. We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome  I hope you enjoy your time here! ~Liancetalk 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cenos Simulation Software (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 02:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cenos Simulation Software

Information icon Hello, Martin-Palmet. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cenos Simulation Software, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cenos Simulation Software

Hello, Martin-Palmet. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cenos Simulation Software".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CENOS has been accepted

CENOS, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SafariScribeEdits! Talk! 10:53, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of CENOS for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CENOS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CENOS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rht bd (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep – disclosed COI: I am affiliated with CENOS.
I agree that any weak, connected, or promotional sources should be discounted or removed, and any wording that appears non-encyclopedic should be cleaned up. However, I believe the subject is still covered by multiple independent sources that support notability, including Engineering.com (2021 and 2023), LSM (2020), Dienas Bizness (2020), and Tech.eu (2022). In my view, the key question is whether the topic has significant independent coverage, and I believe those sources are the relevant basis for evaluating that. Any prose or sourcing cleanup issues can be addressed through normal editing rather than deletion. Martin-Palmet (talk) 19:19, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
I am affiliated with CENOS. Because of that, I am requesting that uninvolved editors review the article for any weak or insufficiently independent sources, remove any promotional wording, and tighten any prose that may appear machine-written or non-encyclopedic. I suggest particular caution with sources that are closely connected to the subject. Martin-Palmet (talk) 19:22, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello! The {{Edit COI}} template is intended for suggesting specific edits to an article's content on that article's talk page. If you have specific edits on CENOS that you'd like to suggest, feel free to make them on Talk:CENOS. Requesting general cleanup is better accomplished by adding cleanup tags to the article, which I'll go ahead and do on your behalf. Cheers! Discourses on Livvy (talk · contribs) 22:08, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate that. I’m affiliated with CENOS, so I’ll avoid making direct article edits and will post any specific suggested changes on Talk:CENOS instead. Thanks again for the cleanup tags. Martin-Palmet (talk) 08:41, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon

Hello Martin-Palmet. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Martin-Palmet. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Martin-Palmet|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sarsenethe/they•(talk) 10:02, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the note.
I am affiliated with CENOS, but I am not being paid or otherwise compensated for editing Wikipedia, and I do not expect to receive compensation for doing so. My edits are voluntary.
I understand that I still have a conflict of interest because of my affiliation, so I will avoid direct article editing and will use the article talk page for any suggestions.
If that changes in the future and I receive or expect to receive compensation related to editing, I understand that I must make the appropriate paid disclosure.
Thank you. Martin-Palmet (talk) 11:32, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
@Martin-Palmet: If you are employed by CENOS in any capacity, the paid editing disclosure policy applies now. It does not matter whether or not you receive specific compensation to edit Wikipedia; and it does not matter if you are making your edits voluntarily or at the direction of your superiors. Your employment by itself is enough to trigger the paid editing disclosure policy. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for the clarification.
Understood. I am affiliated with CENOS, I understand that the paid-contribution disclosure policy applies to my edits relating to CENOS even if I was not separately compensated specifically to edit Wikipedia.
I will correct my earlier statement, add the required paid disclosure on my user page, and avoid direct article editing going forward. I will use the article talk page for any further suggestions.
Thank you. Martin-Palmet (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI