User talk:Mashmore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at page Ahmed Abukhater

This is to ask you to refrain from vandalising (and using profanity) on page Ahmed Abukhater, and consider this your final warning. --PeterDandy (talk) 04:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MapInfo Stratus concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MapInfo Stratus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission MapInfo Stratus

Hello Mashmore. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled MapInfo Stratus.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MapInfo Stratus}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Geocoding may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • data such as building polygons, [[Land_lot|land parcels]], [[street address]]es, [[ZIP codes]] ([[postal codes]] and so on. Geocoding facilitates spatial analysis using [[Geographic information

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MapInfo Professional Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MapInfo Professional Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: PbKey (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PbKey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PbKey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello, Mashmore! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Mashmore. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Precisely (company), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:22, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Finally, please do not use AI to edit or communicate on Wikipedia. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Thank you, I had not intended to break any rules. I appreciate the great work you do. I do have some valuable feedback for this page, should I use the Talk page? Mike Ashmore (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Yes, if you have specific changes, you should use the Edit request wizard to ensure that they eventually get reviewed by an independent editor. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syncsort, formerly Whitlow Computer Systems (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Carolina2k22 were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Carolina2k22(talk) 08:42, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI