User talk:Mepperson94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyer Boots (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 08:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mepperson94! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 08:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

Information icon

Hello Mepperson94. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mepperson94. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mepperson94|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 08:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello,
Thank you for your feedback. I do not have any financial stake to disclose.
I'm still a brand-new Wikipedia contributor and learning the ropes. The article I contributed is not intended to be a promotion. It's the first organization I could think of that didn't already have a Wikipedia page, so I used it to practice. If you could point me to the problematic promotional parts of the article, I would be happy to fix them, but I'm having trouble finding the issues. I included sources from the state's historical society, a local business journal, a press release, and magazines, but I never cited the brand's website or anything they published themselves. Mepperson94 (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyer Boots has been accepted

Hyer Boots, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Czarking0 (talk) 05:27, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tige Boats (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:56, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tige Boats (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JesusisGreat7 were:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 04:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Contributing to Wikipedia

I have seen Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 69#Contributing to Wikipedia. Did you refer to the text "Contribute" above "Help" in the sidebar to the left? It's not supposed to be clickable. There is a line under it, and it's a heading for the following links. It's admittedly hard to guess in our current default skin Vector 2022. It was more clear in the former default Vector, now called Vector legacy, which has several such headings and more space above them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?useskin=vector. I'm considering an interface request to make it more clear it's a heading. If it was indeed your problem then I can include you as an example together with Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 67#The "Contribute" link is not working and Wikipedia:Help desk#"Contribute" Disabled. We don't want our users to think contribution is unwanted. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:51, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tige Boats (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 10:22, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI