User talk:Miaphysis

Hello, Miaphysis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Pope Leo I did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  AntiDionysius (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Just wanted to drop a message here saying hello. ♰ ballads^one 03:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

You are editing a section that is subject to a ongoing ANI dispute, I suggest you to not edit it and restore original version of the section. I also suggest you to have consensus on the things you are adding, specially on the matters that are controversial.

It seems you and a IP address may be engaging in some of-Wiki coordination, I'd also suggest you guys to stop doing this. Wlaak (talk) 22:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

I have restored the original version except the sourced additions I have added, which I have posted on the talk page.

There is zero coordination with the IP address which has not edited anything pertaining to the section. Miaphysis (talk) 22:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

the Name and Identity section is subject to a ongoing ANI, the added content by you is not supported in the sources. I tried grabbing a snapshot from the WayBack Machine but it had no saved URLs, I got access to the original reference through Request Resources and it was not supporting the statement. Wlaak (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Check the link I gave again, I made a spelling error. It supports everything that was said in the statement and I even quoted it in the reference. Miaphysis (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure, bring that to the discussion page for consensus. We have not touched this section ever since there was a ANI opened, we're planning on having a RfC, wait until then I'd suggest.

What's up with all those IP edits coming after you? Could you revert to original version prior to you guys' edits? Such big changes need consensus... Wlaak (talk) 22:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

I am completely unaware of why these edits are taking place. I have brought them up on the discussion page. Miaphysis (talk) 22:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

@Wlaak, No opinion on the disagreement. I will remind you that the AN/I only affects you (as it is your conduct in question) and the filer/other involved editors. Regarding the actual section, what @Robert McClenon has suggested would be the right move, Dispute Resolution or a Request for Comment. @Miaphysis, may edit the article as long as they follow relevant policies. I hope we can move forward, to further the article as a whole. Thank you, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 00:27, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Wlaak - Do not tell another editor not to edit an article unless you can tell that what policy or guideline is involved. There isn't a policy or guideline that permits an editor to assert ownership of an article because of a content dispute, let alone an incorrectly filed conduct dispute. Don't make the same mistake as the filing editor did, or trying to use conduct allegations to interfere with normal editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

@CF-501 Falcon Sorry, I just saw multiple edits coming in from two editors simoltanously. @Miaphysis sorry, you may edit as you like according to Wikipedia policy. Wlaak (talk) 10:24, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

As noted (albeit quite poorly) in the section above, you have a tendency to attempt restoring versions of articles you prefer. You've reverted two editors on Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church and incorrectly claimed that no sources supported the statements you removed. This, combined with your rejection of reliable sources in favor of original research utilizing primary sources on Talk:Oriental Orthodox Churches, raises a few concerns. Please take some time to review the verifiability, original research, sourcing, and edit warring policies (you have not outright violated that last policy, but the reversions are not ideal). If you have questions, please respond here. I want to emphasize that you should still feel comfortable editing, especially since the above section could be construed as an attempt to intimidate you out of participating on the project. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:22, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi, @Miaphysis, I hope all is well.

Recently I created Draft:List of Oriental Orthodox saints. Given your past history of editing within such topics, I'd appreciate any help you can provide. Please take a look at the draft and, if you feel like it, add more content, whether to the list of saints or as peripheral paragraphs. Thanks ~ Hogshine (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)