User talk:MuhammadRaymen01

Hello! I'm Arjayay. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Retro (film) have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox.
The reference you added clearly states 32 crore, so why claim 75 crore? - Arjayay (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tourist Family. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Retro (film), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 17:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:28, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at The Six Dravidians, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've had several other warnings, so this only seems appropriate. Read the rules, stop moving pages and start opening discussions before doing things. COOLIDICAE🕶 20:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm IDB.S. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Velupillai Prabhakaran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. IDB.S (talk) 01:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maaman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Epicion (talk) 04:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Maaman.
IMDB is not a WP:Reliable source as per WP:RSPSOURCES - Arjayay (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

@Callanecc Doug Weller talk 18:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Saathanar did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the Talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Legend of 14 (talk) 00:45, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't see your message I understand MuhammadRaymen01 (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Periyar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Nita Fernando, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hadharem, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:00, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Madharaasi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 16:07, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, MuhammadRaymen01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leo Das, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, MuhammadRaymen01. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Leo Das".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 23:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anjali (actress), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Tyla. Diff: Special:Diff/1333680134. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sneako. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hipal (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dinercoffee. An edit that you recently made to Saathanar seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dinercoffee (talk) 07:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)