User talk:Musicguy555

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonah Marc Levine (April 1)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Jonah Marc Levine to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

nil nz 03:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Musicguy555! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nil nz 03:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
I will revise! And visit Teahouse! Thank you!!! Musicguy555 (talk) 04:03, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
If you have a chance, can you give me more critical feedback so I can continue to fix my page? I believe I meet all eligibility requirements cleanly but want my formatting to be as accurate as possible. Thank you Musicguy555 (talk) 06:45, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Hi @Musicguy555, my recommendation would be to rewrite the draft yourself without using an LLM. Creating a draft with an LLM is forbidden, and even using it to format or copy edit introduces errors. We'd rather have a human-written draft with formatting errors, that an LLM-written draft with factual errors.
One of the specific issues introduced by the LLM is WP:AIATTR and hallucinations. For example:
  • Lines like His production style [...] are noted in publications like WBUR, Hot Press, Stereofox, and the Queensland Times. should include citations to every publication mentioned.
  • Lines like The project also received editorial coverage from publications including Stereofox, The Alternative, Lyrical Lemonade, EARMILK and Fashionably Early. and He discussed the project in an appearance on the iHeartRadio podcast Conversations LIVE. doesn't actually tell us anything.
An encyclopedia article should summarise what reliable sources have written said about its subject; it should not be a roll call of media appearances like you'd see in a PR pack. Don't tell us he's received coverage – tell us what was said in that coverage.
Hope that helps! nil nz 03:50, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Yes! Thank you! I will re-write and make this a reality. Thank you so so much :) ~2026-20478-31 (talk) 04:03, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI