User talk:Mvcg66b3r

@Mvcg66b3r, I was looking on the Rincon website and this image (https://rincon.now/assets/rincon-brands-vKV6zaHW.png) shows all of the stations they own and I saw 3 of the 4 stations (WLNE wasn't included since it has Roar) that are "supposedly" still owned by Standard. Can you try to find something to prove this and update the pages and the Rincon and Standard Media pages? OWaunTon (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

@OWaunTon The acquisitions all look to have closed, so the pages need updating. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 02:25, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Sources from FCC or elsewhere, @Sammi Brie? OWaunTon (talk) 02:28, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Ah OK. I misread this. The deals were approved by the FCC. On 2/19, an extension of time to consummate was requested. There is no further information available. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 02:52, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

So they've been approved, but not completed or something along those lines? OWaunTon (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

And, @Sammi Brie, keep checking for other updates. OWaunTon (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mvcg66b3r and @Sammi Brie, now it appears that some or all of Rincon stations are selling (some back) to Community News Media (although I'm unsure if it's under Standard Media or Standard General. OWaunTon (talk) 02:50, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:WMHT logo 2016.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Mvcg66b3r. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Joyous! Noise! 01:16, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for raising suggestions at categories for discussion. The next time you several categories with similar issues, you can do a group nomination formatted like this one to make it simpler for the other participants. Just a pointer for next time.

Happy editing! - RevelationDirect (talk) 18:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 26 § Establishments and disestablishments in Wyoming on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:14, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Rainbow White Sox WSNS Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, this shouldn't have been redirected without the merge. As it is there is no mention of it at the target article, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

You're just embarrassing everyone including me. You are also making everyone less comfortable and less motivated to edit here on Wikipedia.

Have A Nice Day PBS Kids Fans! ZibityZoom2006 15:58, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi @ZibityZoom2006, you have a very high rate of incorrect page moves and edits that don't meet our policies and guidelines. They contain excessive detail without providing reliable sources to match. We are not Logopedia or a collection of indiscriminate facts; we are an encyclopedia that exercises some judgment about what is topically appropriate and non-trivial about a subject. (talk page stalker) Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 20:55, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

I'd appreciate it if you'd review the vandal listing for RingtailedFox I just added; it provides additional context on why I've accused them of vandalism. They were ejected from the DN42 community by consensus; the continuing attempts to have the article deleted are malicious retribution. Grobe0ba (talk) 22:46, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Some further research shows this isn't the first time this user has maliciously attempted to have articles deleted; see also . They are now permanently blocked on Libera Chat which is one of the largest remaining IRC networks. Grobe0ba (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, I've been on wikipedia since 2004 or so. I'm not a vandal. It's not malicious to want articles deleted if they are either not notable or are honeypot operations. If you want to drag IRC stuff into here, let's do it, but you're not gonna win that argument :) RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 22:59, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Libera Chat has received significant reliable independent coverage, which means that it's presumed notable for Wikipedia's sake until refuted. That it be or not be a honeypot operation (and I cannot find significant reliable independent coverage of Libera Chat that paints it as a honeypot) doesn't factor into notability (i.e. whether Wikipedia should have an article if logistically possible). Ellenor2000 (talk) 00:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Except that's not at all relevant here for this discussion. The only one bringing it up, aside from you, is Grobe0ba above, thinking getting banned from an IRC network is some legendary accomplishment. It's not. people get banned ALL THE TIME. I have no idea why it's so shocking and new and eventful for you.

You two are really obsessed with me lately with how you're following me around on Wikipedia. I'd recommend you stop before other admins have you cease the stalking behaviour, as it violates Wikipedia's rules. RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 00:32, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

There's currently an FFD discussion about en:File:WTNZ-DT2 Bounce Knoxville.png and several similar images. You shouldn't have removed the file from the WTNZ page while the discussion was open - please do not do so again until said discussion is closed. JHD0919 (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Category:Television stations in Fargo–Moorhead has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OWaunTon (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, @Mvcg66b3r, I think the Palm Springs needs massive updates, especially with KPSP-CD and KUNA-LD as it seems to be broadcasts all wonky! OWaunTon (talk) 00:48, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:WHDT logo 2022.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I see that you deleted an edit to the article on WCIU-TV with the comment that it is non-productive. I have gone ahead and reverted your deletion. The edit is factual in nature and uses a legitimate source as citation which meets all of the necessary criteria for inclusion in an encyclopedia. It is not vandalism and expands the article in a non-promotional way. Variety312 (talk) 21:10, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

The citation was improperly formatted so I fixed it. There may be issues with your other edits as well, so I suggest you talk with my friend @Sammi Brie: and see if she can help. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

My guess is that citoid is having issues with TVTech, @Mvcg66b3r. Reversion is not the way to go about that. I've gone ahead and cleaned up the edit to read less like a press release extract too, @Variety312. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 21:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. In terms of the citation, it was created and formatted automatically. Variety312 (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)