User talk:N niyaz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
|
--A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 04:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Yahya Saree
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Yahya Saree, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
Hello! I'm Abo Yemen. Your recent edit(s) to the page Yahya Saree appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Claiming that the word "Houthi" only refers to the movement's leader "Abdul-Malik al-Houthi" is not only WP:OR but is absolutely wrong as Abdul-Malik is not the movement's first leader but Hussein al-Houthi is, which disproves your point + Ansarullah can be considered WP:POV as it translates to "The victors of Allah" Abo Yemen✉ 11:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ansar Allah is the official name for the Houthi Movement, NPOV doesn't count as it is the organization's official name. You do not call the United States of America as "Invaders" and say it's a NPOV even if they have invaded countries before. The name "Houthi" was procured from the Houthi tribe. Most anti-terrorism list from countries like the United States of America and Malaysia lists the organization "Houthi" as Ansarallah and putting the word "Houthi" only as the alias and AKA'. At this point you are the one that is siding towards a party. N niyaz (talk) 13:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary to articles, as you did at Yahya Saree. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to discuss the article, please use Talk:Yahya Saree. Thank you. Abo Yemen✉ 10:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pension fund, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Employees Provident Fund.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
Hi! I noticed that you nominated an article for Good article status. You do not appear to have made significant edits to the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page. Current practice is that only editors who have significantly contributed to the article are able to nominate it (see the nomination instructions). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. Thank you. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of 50 dalil mengapa Anwar tidak boleh jadi PM

The article 50 dalil mengapa Anwar tidak boleh jadi PM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This book itself does not have WP:SIGCOV (literary reviews, criticisms) by secondary sources; it has passing mention due to its defamatory contents.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. JFHJr (㊟) 03:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Hamas
I noticed that a website was added and described as Hamas’s official site. Since I couldn’t find any reliable, independent sources confirming that the site is officially operated by Hamas, I removed it per Wikipedia’s sourcing and verification standards. If there are high-quality reliable sources establishing that connection, I’m happy to review them.Fodient (talk) 03:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi N niyaz. Thank you for your work on Sultan Nazrin Shah Bridge. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed weekend!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 14:27, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
February 2026
Your recent editing history at Talk:Ong Teng Koon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. HurricaneZetaC 17:14, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ong Teng Koon. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:24, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pos Malaysia, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of BHPetrol

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on BHPetrol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of BHPetrol for deletion
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BHPetrol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Capital A moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Capital A. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2026 (UTC)