User talk:NetanelWorthy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi NetanelWorthy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to Palestine/Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to your being blocked from editing.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zionism&diff=prev&oldid=1246093900
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zionism&diff=prev&oldid=1246094648
- @ScottishFinnishRadish. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Inter alia: Special:Contributions/NetanelWorthy IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- If you continue to violate WP:ECR you will be blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- You can go ahead and block me. I don't use this app anymore due to the rampant antisemitism and we have many members that are fighting every single day to remove the atrocious article articles you are publishing on this website.
- As somebody that works in journalism, we've also brought this to the international audience.
- So you go right ahead and block me. It doesn't matter. We have many of us fixing this problem. Or advocating pulling crowd funding from Wikipedia altogether.
- So feel free. NetanelWorthy (talk) 23:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
February 2025
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Natalie Portman. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Can you please chime in on this users' editwarring, this is the forth time (2nd today) they have removed the same information, also have request at RFPP. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ponyo is always there to pick up my slack. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyobons mots 21:34, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.