Wikiwand AI

User talk:Nguyenngocthanhtoan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nguyenngocthanhtoan (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 14:52, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nguyenngocthanhtoan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 14:52, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chùa Phổ Lại (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
History, architecture and religious activity sections all show evidence of being written by LLM / Artificial Intelligence, which then makes it difficult to assess this article and establish notability. It needs to be re-written by a human.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 00:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Chùa Phổ Lại has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chùa Phổ Lại. Thanks! ChrysGalley (talk) 10:20, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chùa Phổ Lại has been accepted

Chùa Phổ Lại, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 10:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Chùa Phổ Lại for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chùa Phổ Lại is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chùa Phổ Lại until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cherry Cotton Candy 16:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

March 2026

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at User talk:Pythoncoder, you may be blocked from editing. If your comment is not LLM-generated, please provide a satisfactory alternative explanation as to why it reads like it is. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:54, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, @Pythoncoder, for your response.
I am a new contributor and am still becoming familiar with some Wikipedia guidelines, especially regarding discussions on user talk pages. I would like to clarify a few points as follows:
Regarding my editing process, I have personally written and edited the content in a transparent manner, based on available sources. I only use a single account for all my contributions, including work on Draft:Thích Trung Hiếu.
The draft Draft:Thích Trung Hiếu has been submitted for review for over 40 days without feedback. Therefore, I reached out to some experienced editors to kindly request guidance and evaluation.
All messages posted on editors’ talk pages were written by me (I do not use any AI tools to generate my comments or edits on Wikipedia). However, I have a habit of reusing similar introductory messages when reaching out, which may have caused the impression that the content was automatically generated. I acknowledge this oversight and will adjust my approach to avoid misunderstandings in the future.
You may review my editing history at Draft:Thích Trung Hiếu and Chùa Phổ Lại to see my contributions.
I sincerely appreciate your understanding and any further guidance you may offer. Thank you very much. Nguyenngocthanhtoan (talk) 12:46, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm Massive flight. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Huế, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Massive flight (talk) 23:00, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Nguyenngocthanhtoan! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Draft review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thích Trung Hiếu (May 9)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Avgeekamfot, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Thích Trung Hiếu to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Avgeekamfot (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thích Trung Hiếu (August 10)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Absurdum4242, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
You’ve made a really good effort on the article, unfortunately I still don’t think we have enough sources to show notability. Almost all of the references talk mainly about the Pagoda, and mention Thich mostly in passing. Rather than a stand alone article, it might be better to add the more important parts of this article into the Pagoda article as a section on the Abbott. Good luck and keep up the good work.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Thích Trung Hiếu to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Absurdum4242 (talk) 02:42, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks