User talk:Obinna Tony

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blessing Uzzi, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Let me fix it. Obinna Tony (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abuchi Peter Ugwu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abuchi Peter Ugwu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

JTtheOG (talk) 03:53, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

HI, @JTtheOG

Thank you so much. I believe the wiki page has enough secondary sources detailing the individual. It is also a profile of the current Executive Director of one of the biggest music label in Nigeria.

I am open to answering other questions in terms of other Wikipedia policies and guidelines, though your template is vague.

Best. Obinna Tony (talk) 06:54, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I am concerned that none of the independent sources seem to provide significant, in-depth coverage of the subject. They seem to simply repeat or rephrase things he said, instead of discussing the subject in depth. JTtheOG (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Well, I am assuming that's because he attends events as a smaller entity representing a bigger entity Chocolate City (record label). Though I am willingly to see how the discussion turns out. Being an executive director of the label, we can argue it makes him notable enough but beyond that, he is just an average successful business person. Obinna Tony (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

It seems like that would mean that the label is notable but not him, unless there is significant coverage presented in the discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 08:30, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

A few of the sources still cover him significantly, which you say are promotional, but I don’t think so. Since he is an executive director of a notable label, isn’t it reasonable to assume good faith that the articles were written because he is notable? Not promotional? I mean, an independent writing can sound very promotional especially in a field like music that requires tooting one’s horn. Obinna Tony (talk) 08:40, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

For example, in this puff piece, it says: Interestingly, Abuchi’s appointment as CEO came after a bold conversation with co-founder Paul Okeugo where he expressed his desire to run the company, believing the founders were ready to step back. This assertiveness showcased his confidence in his ability to lead and revitalize the company. I hope we can agree to discard this AI slop article entirely. Which other sources would you say contain the best in-depth coverage of him? JTtheOG (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

All right. I’m cool with whatever decisions are made. Obinna Tony (talk) 06:04, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Obinna Tony, in these edits, you added references. I'm a bit worried if you checked the contents, because for this information: "Lorde graduated from Hunter College High School in 1951", you added the reference "Charger Press". Charger Press. 2026-04-27. Retrieved 2026-04-27., which is a home page of a news website. There is one page about Audre Lorde on that website, Audre Lorde: Powerful and Dangerous, where it says "After returning to New York, Lorde attended Hunter College, graduating in 1959" - not 1951. I don't have the time or energy to check the other references. Did you use an AI tool to add these sources? Laurier (xe or they) (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Why would I use AI for the source when it's easier to use google and find the source? I must have mistakenly slashed off the URL while copying it and it registered as the frontpage?

Also, I added that source because it says Lorde "After graduating high school, Lorde spent a highly influential year at the National University of Mexico in 1954," which means she indeed graduated high school before 1954 which could be 1951. So, I assumed the Hunter College of 1959 is different from Hunter College high school. Obinna Tony (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

As you can see, they have a bad URL that has "home" on their link: https://www.chargerpress.com/home/audre-lorde-powerful-and-dangerous Obinna Tony (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean by "they have a bad URL that has "home" on their link"? Also, it 'could be 1951' is not enough to use this as a source, I'd think? Laurier (xe or they) (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

I mean, the URL has "home" on it, so I could have possibly copied half of the link hence why it registered as the home page.

The source supports she graduated from Hunter's College. That was why I still added it, pending "contested dates." Obinna Tony (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Without a proper source verifying the year, I've removed 1951 from the text. JTtheOG (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

You added just chargerpress.com, not chargerpress.com/home or anything. Anyway, thank you for putting the right url in the reference now, and thank you JTtheOG for removing the year. Laurier (xe or they) (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nkwobi, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igbo was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:30, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pounded yam

added links pointing to Hausa and Igbo

Ofe Ujuju

added a link pointing to Ika

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Obinna Tony. Thank you for your work on Ani Kayode Somtochukwu. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 13:16, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Obinna Tony (talk) 13:33, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Initiative Sankofa d'Afrique de l'Ouest when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:39, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Oh. Thank you. I was using The initiative For Equal Rights infobox as a guide. Because this would be my first time of editing organization’s infobox. Thank you, once again. Obinna Tony (talk) 15:46, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gizdodo, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yoruba was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Busi Kheswa

added a link pointing to South African

Noxolo Nogwaza

added a link pointing to South African

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Initiative Sankofa d'Afrique de l'Ouest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Initiative Sankofa d'Afrique de l'Ouest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:00, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Improved Sexual Health and Rights Advocacy Initiative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improved Sexual Health and Rights Advocacy Initiative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:21, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Kendyson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Kendyson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:27, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, I am concerned that your notification at WT:LGBTQ+ at least borders on WP:CANVASSing. I would suggest rephrasing it as a more neutral notification. Your concerns about a coordinated, motivated deletion campaign would be better suited for a venue like WP:AN. My intent here is to be helpful. I have not yet reviewed the AfD nominations but I am sensitive to the issues you identify. Notifying the WikiProject is appropriate but non-neutral notifications are against the guidelines and may backfire if the deletion discussions achieve the desired outcome but the appearance or reality of "canvassing" invalidates or calls into question the legitimacy of the results. —Myceteae‍🌈 (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I will edit it. Obinna Tony (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Done. Obinna Tony (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

That's much better. As I mentioned earlier, if you have evidence of a coordinated, ideologically motivated deletion campaign, those should be taken to an appropriate venue. It would be best to discuss with the nominator on their talk page first. You would need to provide evidence for a report to WP:AN or WP:ANI to be taken seriously. I just did some quick poking around and I see that the editor who nominated this articles has created articles like this one, which seems inconsistent with an ideological motivation. This is by no means definitive and I have not done anything close to a thorough investigation and I trust that you are far more familiar with this situation and topic area than I am. —Myceteae‍🌈 (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

I mean, they created them for a specific wiki love pride contest. That’s not their area of focus but putting LGBTIQ organisation on deletion and their assertions doesn’t make sense. They have not approved any of my article before, so, I’m worried they are now on these. Obinna Tony (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm just saying, I wouldn't expect someone who is opposed to covering Nigerian LGBTQ+ topics on Wikipedia to create an article like that for Wiki Loves Pride. Hopefully there will be more eyes on the articles and discussions to bring the proper decision, and possibly improvements to the article if necessary to 'keep'. —Myceteae‍🌈 (talk) 16:24, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

He seems to be against LGBTIQ Nigerian articles that relies heavily on Nigerian sources either calling them no significant coverage (despite significant coverage) or non reliable source. Obinna Tony (talk) 16:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Also, the second Nigerian reviewer being on all the nominated pages supporting, tells me all I needed to know. Obinna Tony (talk) 17:04, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

@Obinna Tony I completely understand having concerns. In my experience, the most effective approach to counter potential bias on Wikipedia is to stick to policies and guidelines very carefully, exercising a lot of care to be civil in my replies. I encourage taking a deep breath, considering complaining privately to a friend, then looking up the relevant guidelines and policies and applying them in your replies. These are a few essays with informal advice that may be helpful or interesting: Wikipedia:Don't call the kettle black, Wikipedia:Don't shoot yourself in the foot, Wikipedia:Don't bludgeon the process. Dreamyshade (talk) 20:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah. Thank you. I over reacted at first. I guess I will need to slow down a bit. Thank you. Obinna Tony (talk) 20:16, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Definitely a good approach. —Myceteae‍🌈 (talk) 21:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

@Obinna Tony Looking at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Kendyson, I also suggest reading Wikipedia:Don't attack the nominator, ad hominem, WP:BATTLEGROUND, and Wikipedia:Beyond civility. Dreamyshade (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Omg. 😭 let me edit my response. I’m so exhausted. Sorry. Obinna Tony (talk) 18:51, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much @Dreamyshade for always calling my attention. I will be cautious with my words moving forward. Obinna Tony (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

@Obinna Tony Glad to hear it. I recommend completely ignoring (and not responding to) any comments toward you that are uncivil, combative, impolite, or frustrating. Let somebody else argue. This is a form of de-escalation that can reduce the chances of heated arguments that result in getting blocked again, enabling you to make the constructive edits that you are here to do. Dreamyshade (talk) 15:29, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Country Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:38, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:00, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

It's entirely possible that another admin might reduce or eliminate this block, since you've promptly removed the several personal attacks you've been called out on over the past couple of days, so consider well what you want to say in your unblock request, and it could be successful. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

All right. Thank you. 🥹 I’m so sorry. I waited for a whole 24 hours for an administrator to review but nothing so far. I’m so sorry for everything! I really need to make important edits. Obinna Tony (talk) 19:59, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

It can take a while for people to work through the queue -- there are a lot of people requesting unblock at any given time. Good luck! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:29, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you. Obinna Tony (talk) 20:32, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Consider adding a bit more detail to your unblock request, showing that you've read some relevant policy and guideline pages and digested their meaning? That can be an encouraging sign that a person has reflected a bit. You could also describe the constructive edits that you want to make. Dreamyshade (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

All right. Obinna Tony (talk) 06:10, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I didn't know I would need to add the constructive edits section since I wasn't blocked from editing. Done. Obinna Tony (talk) 06:20, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, @SarekOfVulcan

I am really so sorry and I will definitely refrain from personal attacks, moving forward. It doesn’t look like another admin wants to take a look at my request reason. Is it not possible to evaluate from your end?

Best! Obinna Tony (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

It's not just you - I know someone else who has been waiting a while. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

All right. No problems. I was just going through logged requests and a few people already got responses. 🥹 Obinna Tony (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

I couldn’t reply via the unblock comment. So, I’m replying here. Thank you so much. 🥺🥺 Obinna Tony (talk) 14:26, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Obinna Tony (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

I was blocked for making personal attacks towards other editors through mentioning their identities.

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I would stop mentioning people’s identities during conversations. I have read some Wikipedia rules as shared by User:Dreamyshade who has helped me highlight them

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

Though I felt personally targeted by people whose ideological differences I believe influenced their actions toward me, I mentioned their identity during the conversations as the reason I felt targeted. I did not realize that this could be classified as a personal attack. Once it was pointed out to me, I removed those references. I mostly make constructive edits on LGBTQ+ articles, track and field articles, and general Nigerian cultural articles. I would really love to continue making these. Thank you.

Obinna Tony (talk) 19:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Another admin advised me they thought an unblock was acceptable, so rather than wait for someone else to review, doing it myself. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Potential_mass_improper_AfC_acceptances

This discussion is regarding AfC reviewer SafariScribe. I have brought up the previous discussion about him nominating LGBTQ+ articles for deletion, which you started. You may offer your input (but please, no personal attacks, let's keep cool heads this time around). jolielover♥talk 04:37, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Obinna Tony (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

You might interested in this, @Dreamyshade & @Myceteae.

not sure I’d want to be involved in the discussion. Obinna Tony (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @Obinna Tony, appreciate the ping for general awareness, but I also don't plan to get involved. I figure my comments in the recent AfD discussions are easy enough to find for folks reviewing the editor's contributions. Dreamyshade (talk) 05:35, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll take a look and see if I have anything constructive to add. —Myceteae‍🌈 (talk) 00:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, please do you mind having a look at an Igbo related Afc approved article discussing Igbo regalia and Headdresses currently being vandalised by a user @Dolpina:. I've been trying to invite some independent reviewers but they said the topic is outside their scope. Found you via your contributions on Igbo related articles. Please check hereTalk:Igbo regalia and headdresses Igbo regalia and headdresses Dreune (talk) 06:29, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

I will take a look later. Thank you. Obinna Tony (talk) 06:39, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Alright. Dreune (talk) 07:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

I will advise that you don't keep accusing me of vandalism without proof because that is against Wikipedia guidelines. Dolpina (talk) 09:19, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Improved Sexual Health and Rights Advocacy Initiative. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improved Sexual Health and Rights Advocacy Initiative closed with this result. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Owen× ☎ 15:45, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Anna Ekeledo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 15:05, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I don’t have any conflict of interest & on promotional part, I worked with information available to me (business leaders article mostly have tendency to sound like this). I will edit the article later to make it less promotional. Obinna Tony (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Done. @Zippybonzo

None of the information I added on the article was made up by me. You can take a look at my sources. They exist there. It's not like I have a personal relationship with them. I occasionally work on articles of people I know by researching them. Obinna Tony (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

While I won’t speculate on the conflict of interest (although to me it did appear to be that way), the article reads promotionally of both the person and their company — the entire Career section reads to me like a resume, as does the Awards and recognition section, and I don’t think it’s ready for publication Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 17:12, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Okay.

They are the executive director of the company not the owner. I felt to add the company on their own profile since it doesn’t have a page yet and not that notable (as you can see on the article, I still highlighted the actual company’s chair).

finally, just know I didn’t invent any new information. All I used was what I saw in the sources I found on google . Obinna Tony (talk) 17:24, 7 July 2026 (UTC)