User talk:PublicityVote

Hi PublicityVote, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Joy (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi PublicityVote! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Joy (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi, please stop editing unreliable, poor, outdated and not notable images depicting Croatian early medieval rulers to respective articles, per Wikipedia policy and discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Modern images of early medieval rulers in infobox or article. Miki Filigranski (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I can most definitely stop but what is the Wikipedia policy? And I was about to ask you what was wrong of having a painting of King Tomislav as a main picture and a representation of the biggest Croatian King that has ever existed? The statue doesn't do him justice.

And consider the editing done. Was just trying to use images that are already there. PublicityVote (talk) 16:20, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

I see you have already been cautioned about this by User:Miki Filigranski. Again, please stop adding outdated photos to the infobox. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

You clearly don’t seem to understand that photos (edits) you just reversed are outdated photos, hamilton 2008 skyline? If anything I’m up-dating photos, lol PublicityVote (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

You clearly don't seem to understand that 2008 is two years after 2006. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello PublicityVote! Your additions to Bundek have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian art, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St James and St Blaise. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:The Best of Sade album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Đakovo Cathedral

added links pointing to Evangelists, Interior, Šentvid and Friedrich Schmidt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lists of Roman sites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pola.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop exchanging the top images on Croatian islands without good reasons. What is the advantage of having a satellite image of the island just above a map of the island, instead of a more iconic view to capture the island, like on Brač? I think it would be great if you helped in the selection of the best picture for the islands (Hvar, Čiovo, etc.), but in most cases I don't expect that to be the satellite view. --denny vrandečić (talk) 09:00, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

I dont know why are you so stuck up to the basic photos of proposed islands… Inform yourself and look at other pages of islands in Europe and rest of the world. Čiovo you changed into depressing, low quality and miserable image, brač is the same photo as Zlatni rat, which represents the beach not the island - wheres creativity, wheres diversity? I don’t know who put you as main editor and final decision maker, but you aren’t. Wikipedia is constatnly chaning and updating. I expect satellite view as the directly indicates view of an island not something random. PublicityVote (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

What do you even mean with this edit comment?

Or this edit comment? What removal has not been explained here?

Or this edit comment? The picture was not a repeat. --denny vrandečić (talk) 18:42, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

PublicityVote, you have made less than 900 edits, and have been cautioned twice about your photos. Please take a moment to read MOS:IMAGES. --Magnolia677 (talk) 19:36, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

it’s absurd to talk about how much edits I have, and you have. Numbers don’t mean your edits matter and my dont. I have a right of making, updating and informing whatever I want by not vandalising wikipedia which I’m not doing by removing photos. Inform yourself since you have so much edits and look up on other islands in the world and their main photos. Thank you. PublicityVote (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

We can both search up and find better photos in case you don’t like the satellite ones (which I do), but your photos are useless to the page of discussion (which would be island of Croatia). You’re putting random picutres that don’t represent the island but rather… Their iconic monument, landmarks or neither. Thanks PublicityVote (talk) 21:19, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

I am totally up to suggestions of better pictures for the islands. I do agree that Čiovo in particular doesn't have a great header picture. But the satellite picture really seems like a last resort, if there's nothing else good. Again, since the satellite image is right above the map, I don't see much added value.

The satellite picture instead of the map, well, that would be a different story! --denny vrandečić (talk) 12:52, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Pick

PublicityVote (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I was hoping to have to pick something for Hvar, Čiovo, or Rab.

For Brač, I don't think that any of the ones you suggest are more iconic or representative for Brač. I mean, your fourth picture is of Zlatni Rat, but why would it be a better picture than the current one, where at least it is immediately recognizable? The second and third picture just show barely recognizable buildings in a minor bay. The first picture has no detail either, just a picture of the southern side of the island taken from Hvar. There is already a panorama picture of the whole island further down in the article.

But as you already correctly pointed out, I am not the arbiter here. Maybe explain what you find better about these pictures on the talk page, and maybe we will get more people to weigh in. For me, the current picture is iconic for the island (hey, I've even seen it representing all of Croatia!), recognizable, colorful, and unique for Brač. In my opinion, your choices look more like generic Dalmatian houses, beaches, and landscapes. --denny vrandečić (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Hrvatske Željeznice Putnički Prijevoz.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2026 (UTC)