User talk:Pushpaaam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!


Hello, Pushpaaam, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Pushpaaam, good luck, and have fun.JJMC89(T·C) 00:12, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
thanks Pushpaaam (talk) 01:54, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 16)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, CNMall41, left the following feedback:
This draft duplicates another submission, Dhamaal 4, currently submitted for review. To save time, we will review the other submission only. Any future edits or improvements should be made on that submission, not here.

Next steps

  • Edit User:Pushpaaam/sandbox to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

CNMall41 (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pushpaaam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhamaal 4 (March 16)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, CNMall41, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
This draft's references do not show that the film meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for films. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the film in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the film, such as press releases, the studio's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Dhamaal 4 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

CNMall41 (talk) 03:29, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhamaal 4 (March 17)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Robert McClenon, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the film meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for films. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the film in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the film, such as press releases, the studio's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
There is nothing in this draft that establishes general notability, which is based on significant coverage by independent sources.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NFILM is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NFILM for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Dhamaal 4 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Detective Conan: Fallen Angel of the Highway Revealed as 29th Anime Film (March 17)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, AlphaBetaGamma, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
I'm not sure where to start. WP:IMDB is not a reliable source, and I'm pretty sure you've just committed copyright violations on Wikimedia Commons as well because I have a hunch you did not produce that movie poster. 47% on earwig. The title reads like a blog post as well.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 04:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI