User talk:Samuel J Walker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Samuel J Walker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 21:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Samuel J Walker, you are invited to the Teahouse


Teahouse logo

Hi Samuel J Walker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Struway2. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Birmingham City F.C. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Struway2 (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Teddy Davison with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 22:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Grand Theft Auto V soundtrack. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 15:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Norwich City F.C.

and both says the 6 players "are leaving in the summer, when their contracts run out". Nobody's contract runs out in May, they all last until 30 June, so that's when they'll actually leave the club. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Adam Johnson

Hi why did you delete my post that he's currently a free agent? How else should I describe in the Infobox that he no longer has a club? I added that for clarity as it's not clear in his Infobox whether he plays or not at the moment. Huddsblue (talk) 00:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello. Please do not remove information from an article without explaining why in an edit summary. Otherwise other editors might think you are vandalising the article. Thank you  Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

I removed some of the more intricate details of Beeching's address because, as far as I was aware, Wikipedia didn't post full addresses. Also, I was clearing the infobox of a number of unused parameters. Samuel J Walker (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with removing unused parameters. However the place of death might be seen as relevant. An edit summary would help make your motives clear.  Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Secondly, regarding the Adam Johnson edit. The totalcaps parameter is usually reserved for retired players. I'd added it originally but decided to remove it because Johnson isn't retired (at least by choice) and it doesn't feature on Ched Evans' page either. Samuel J Walker (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Okay, fair enough. But please use those edit summaries! Regards  Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Derek Leckenby does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Edit summaries don't have to be detailed; for a list of commonly-used abbreviations, see Wikipedia:Edit summary legend/Quick reference. Miniapolis 15:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ollie Banks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 06:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lennard Pearce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Chesterfield F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillingham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Samuel J Walker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

3rd opinion Gateshead

3rd opinion on Gateshead

Hello Samuel J Walker, I have asked for mediation on the Gateshead article. Also here is the talk url on the Gateshead talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gateshead#Gateshead_County_Borough_Citation 82.13.142.140 (talk) for your view 07:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I think I went to the wrong place I should have gone here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Third_opinion I'll put that down to my lack of experience with the dispute resolution process. However I am always willing to compromise. How about this edit? 'Part of County Durham until 1835[1] when the town became a part of Gateshead County Borough,[1] part of Gateshead County Borough until 1974 when the town became part of Gateshead Metropolitan Borough;[1] Gateshead... and so on' I'd say that is neutral.Barkleave09 (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Wimbledon

Hi. Could you give a rationale for this edit? Thanks in advance. --John (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Until 1965 Wimbledon was in Surrey and not considered part of London. Samuel J Walker (talk) 21:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Is there a consensus that this sort of edit is a good thing? --John (talk) 23:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know if there's a consensus on anything. I think it's probably fairly minor, though some people I've come across do appreciate these types of edits. For me personally, I have an interest in the historic counties so I try and correct any errors I come across, so I think it's probably an "as and when" thing rather than a consensus. Hope that helps. Samuel J Walker (talk) 23:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
It's the sort of thing I have seen people get very upset over. It might be worth having a central discussion, or finding if one has already taken place. It shouldn't be marked as minor I think. --John (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Andrew Sachs

Thanks for adding the 'hidden advice re DoD...my attempt to do the same got lost in an edit conflict I think. Please note quotes in boldname should be outside the bolding per WP:MOSLEAD and / or WP:QUOTENAME. Thanks. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Gateshead". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 9 December 2016.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 08:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Placenames

I'm not that happy that you didn't reply to my last note above, but went straight to this. Can you have a think about what you are doing and get back to me please. --John (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I didn't get back to your previous reply because I was at work. My point is highlighted here, most prominently in the "use modern names section". I point to this part of it: "Older names should be used in appropriate historical contexts when a substantial majority of reliable modern sources does the same; this includes the names of articles relating to particular historical periods". Between 1949 and 1990 there were two "Germanys", the FRG (West Germany) and GDR (East Germany), likewise with East and West Berlin. The reason I changed it was because at the time of Merkel's birth, Hamburg was in the FRG, which was West Germany. On a similar note, if you look at Vladimir Putin's page, the infobox there reads that he was born in Leningrad, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union, because that is what it was at the time of his birth. Samuel J Walker (talk) 19:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for that, it makes sense. I recommend that you link to this guideline in your edit summary, and certainly do not mark such edits as minor. I am well aware of 20th-century European history and know that the names can change over time. I am also aware that here on Wikipedia making such changes can be controversial, as it can be in real life. Such changes can generate heat out of all proportion to their real utility to the encyclopedia, so you should be prepared to discuss such changes case-by-case if asked. Guidelines are not binding in this project and it is perfectly possible that local consensus may over-ride it on occasion. So long as you bear this in mind, use informative edit summaries and keep a sense of proportion about consistency, you should be fine. Thanks again, --John (talk) 20:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Most of the time I do not mark edits like those as minor, this one must have slipped through the net. I am aware that making such edits can be hot topics and I usually leave edit summaries explaining my actions. What I sometimes do is leave the internal notes if there are quite a few edit wars over these issues (one such page is the Paul Hollywood page over the county of his birth), and most of the time these edits are made with minimum fuss. Thanks for the heads-up though, I'll bear it in mind. Samuel J Walker (talk) 20:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Gateshead, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

H.H. Asquith

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Timestamp

Chesterfield F.C.

Milton Keynes postcodes

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Infobox dates

March 2018

June 2018

Leicester City squad template

November 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Tommy Cooper

January 2019

Fawlty Towers

Re: Fawlty Towers

Infobox timestamps

Released players

Paul Angelis

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

September 2020

November 2020

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Nomination of Aston Oxborough for deletion

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

User page disruption

Update date

Newcastle v Leicester

Joyce Grenfell

From your talkpage it's obvious, you are a source of pointless edits

2022-23 Leicester City season

Special bank holidays in 2022 and 2023 in the United Kingdom

A Fawlty collaboration?

Rafa benitez image

Scotland postcode districts changes

Trimsaran

"Unsure where a source can be found to be honest apart from keeping a tally from King's Lynn's matches this season"

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI