User talk:Sborsody
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Sborsody, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Wikiacc (talk) 21:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Doshpuluur
Hi. I see that someone has imported your fine GFDL article here from tyvawiki. I was wondering if you could confirm that the image you uploaded there is also under a free license. Thanks.--Pharos 07:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Magyars
Thanks, ussually hungarians like to inflate their numbers. They ussually add also the minorities. --Eliade 17:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- The general practice in math is to round the number up despite what hidden nationalistic motives anyone may have. Since you wanted to get into a reversion war with KissL I stepped in with the citation from the 2001 Hungarian census. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 19:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for digging up the exact number. KissL 17:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Why you made that irony Kiss? --Eliade 17:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Altaic?
Hi, The main problem is related with the "(disputed)" tag, cause this leads misunderstanding. There exists Altaic Languages but there is going on discussion about Altaic thesis. This "(disputed)" tag causes the misunderstanding that "--- language's being Altaic is disputed". For this reason, i'm supporting to remove the "disputed" tag. The discussion should be done either in the Altaic Languages page or maybe better in the Altaic hypothesis page. e104421 3 September 2006, 20:15 (UCT)
Central Asia
If you are interested in adding to articles about Central Asia, please join WikiProject Central Asia - we would welcome you. Aelfthrytha 12:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Hakozen and Huns
Please help improve his poor edits to the article, not just comment on the Talk page, if you have the time. I might hit 3RR, but it's obvious that there is community opinion against him, I just need other people to show up and act. CRCulver 23:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I can after dinner ;) --Stacey Doljack Borsody 00:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- The sentence you inserted back is a pov style sentence (reflecting the opinion authors of the references), i paraphrased it in order to make article more neutral. E104421 17:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- The sentence is a quote from a source. Quoting sources does not make the article itself POV. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 17:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, i'm not claiming so, but better to paraphrase. E104421 17:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Huns
Have you ever read the contents of the link pages? 18:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not the one including Attila to the list. If his name stays in the list, the see also link is appropriate. For the Xiongnu article, there exists a section related with Huns. I just wondered why you really insisted on removing Xiongnu. We can discuss the issue in more detail if you want. Sorry, maybe because of the language barrier, i wrote so direct. What i want to say is the article related with Xiongnu contains material related with Huns. The see also links does not have to be directly related with the article itself. They just provide additional topics. That's it. Regards. E104421 21:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
List of Turks
I've noticed your engagement in List of Turks. Taht article is - like most of the Turkey-related articles - flooded with POV. I've removed a few names that have nothing to do with Turkish people (see ) - but the article still contains countless POV claims.
Tājik 21:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
RE: Tuva
The change of the name seemed a tad suspicious however, I will assume good faith. Have you proposed this name change on the talk page by any chance? If so then I have no problem with it.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Actually no need to check back I took a look at Talk:Tooruktug Dolgay Tangdym myself. Thanks for proposing it first and my apologies for any hard feelings.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Dingling
Hi there. I just wanted to drop you a note. You said you were frustrated by the reversions of the "main editor" of the Dingling article. There's an official Wiki policy on "ownership" of articles: Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. I'm going to drop a hint on the talk page of Dingling and see what happens. In the meantime, if you don't want to wrestle with blockheads, there are plenty of other articles that desperately need help. Thanks for writing. Cbdorsett 05:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
The New Central Asia project page
Hi
I revised (a bit radically) the navigation system of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Central Asia. You are a member of the project, I would appreciate if you would compare with the old page and give a feedback on the talk page. I am asking this because some old members of the project expressed concerns. Thanks. cs 22:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Kurów
Could you please write a stub here - just a few sentences based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurów ? Only 2-5 sentences enough. Please.
PS. Article about Kurów is already on 175 languages. If your village/town/city hasn't on PL wiki, I can do article about it. Pietras1988 TALK 17:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Hun CA wikiproject
You claimed that there was a concensus amongst wikiproject members in central Asia group, but nowhere else I could found any of such concensus, since you're a participant there, please enlightened me. My main consideration is that the history of early Huns are clearly illegible and a myth which cannot be taken as a historial facts, I'm suggesting an wikiproject ukraine to be replaced central asia ones. Eiorgiomugini 07:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I wrote, Until there is consensus. In no way did I claim there was consensus. I agree with you that the article probably doesn't fall within the scope of Wikiproject Central Asia and the same can be said for Wikiproject Turkey (see Talk:Huns#WikiProject_Turkey?). But any wikiproject members are allowed to tag any article they want. The article then eventually gets assessed and if the assessment team thinks the article isn't relevant it gets removed from the project. You can bring this up with the Wikiproject Central Asia assessment team if you feel so passionate about it. Additionally, no Wikiproject Ukraine member ever tagged the article. You could add their tag to it and request assessment as well, but the fact that they haven't done it yet tells me they think Huns doesn't apply to them. You should probably keep in mind that the Wikiprojects are not attempting to classify articles, but improve them. If having the Huns article be a part of Wikiproject Central Asia or Turkey brings editors who can provide more information about the Huns, this isn't a bad thing. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 14:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
genetic/geneological
Hi Sborsody,
Actually, a lot of linguists are abandoning the term "genetic" because of confusion with genetics, now that mainstream researchers are starting to take interdisciplinary approaches to history, combining genetics and linguistics. That's why I made the change at Yeniseian. kwami 17:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Good job adding the reference that Reid used
Thanks. And for the clean-up in style. KP Botany 03:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
please justify unusual spelling
Hi, I reverted your unusual spelling of "Uriankhai" again. In the editor note to my first revert, I remarked that I can see no reason for your choice of spelling, and you still haven't provided one. This is not a matter of good or bad faith, but a normal procedure. if one of your edits gets reverted, then you need to justify it with rational arguments, not just with an exasperated complaint in your own editor note. --Latebird 18:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oops, now I finally figured that it wasn't actually you adding the strange spelling, you just turned it into a piped link. Guess I shouldn't just look at the right side of the diff screen. Sorry for the confusion... I now changed it to a straight link. --Latebird 18:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
huns
how can you claim that huns speak a non-turkic language, with what kind of source?--hakozen 02:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- I made no such claim. Read the comments I left on Talk:Huns. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 03:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
you destroyed the page, bro. applause--Orkh (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Magyaristani topic
Hi, i wasnt vandalising, i created a new topic with all the reference underneath, i understand u never of magyaristani but that doesnt mean u have to delete it and i was vandalising.--West Bank Boy 15:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Overtone singing
At the moment, the sentence gives the impression that overtone singing "comes naturally to" the Tuvan people, giving the impression they are somehow genetically predisposed to be able to do this. Also, the parts of the brain which deal with language learning are very specific and different to cognitive learning in later life, and it may be misleading to say that this form of singing is learnt in the same way as one learns to talk. Being as the article makes these claims, it should be able to justify them with a source. If I am mistaken, and the sentence is not making these claims, then it should be rewritten as I'm sure I won't be the only one to misinterpret its meaning. Yeanold Viskersenn 15:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your involvement in Hungarian prehistory
Also a Happy New Year to you! Squash Racket (talk) 07:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
February 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. -- Mentifisto 18:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the misunderstanding. BTW, I didn't create that article. --Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Tuva Workgroup
Thanks for your invitation. For numerous reasons I am not joining any wikigroups (at least voluntarily). I do understand that workgroups are very important. At the same time I believe that my chaotic style of contributions is important as well. My primary goal is filling glaring gaps quickly as soon as I see them anywhere, leaving the work of polishing, "featured article" writing (and barnstar earning :-) to real experts it the corresponding domains. `'Míkka>t 18:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Stacey! Thanks for the invitation, but I have to decline. Tuva only interests me as one of the federal subjects of Russia, on administrative and municipal divisions of which I am concentrating. This, I believe, is too narrow of a scope for a member of Tuva Workgroup. That said, please do not hesitate to contact me if I could be useful regarding those aspects of Tuva. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks anyways Mikkalai and Ezhiki! --Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure, I'll join your group. Tuva or Bust! —Keenan Pepper 23:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure I have much more of value to offer at this point, other than grunt work--the articles are much more sophisticated now than when I was actively editing them. I'd be willing to help out with a team effort, though. Takwish | Talk 21:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
WPCENTRALASIA
WP Central Asia
In your opinion has this quieted down, then? I missed the whole mess due to real life, but I was quite concerned to come back and find what I did. It doesn't give me special rights of control, but I do have special feelings for the project because I founded it. Don't like seeing fights. No other deletion proceedings or battles on? Aelfthrytha (talk) 01:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- I haven't seen hide nor hair from User:John Carter since Feb. 4. It seems like a lot of the discussion and arguing went on elsewhere. I don't watch any pages related to deleting wikiprojects so I can't say for certain, but I would imagine that if there were some sort of proceedings going on, it would not be so in the dark like the arguing between John Carter and Latebird. --Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 02:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Central Asia
I would love to be part of a Central Asia project, though I have been very busy lately and I can't promise I'd be able to contribute often. Let me know if you need anything specific that I can help with. Jag är glad över att ha träffat du! -Nathan (User:Aelffin)
Fenevad
Walnut pin Vilmos: online works of folklorist Diószegi Vilmos in English, through translation bots
Dear Stacey Doljack Borsody,
You wrote me that You would like that more works of Diószegi Vilmos and Hoppál Mihály were available in English. I have found a complex solution:
- searching an online work by Diószegi in Hungarian (there are some, whole books are made available), for example in Hungarian Electronic Library (it has also an English version): they have made both books Shamanism and also Tracing shamans in Siberia online free available (in Hungarian)
- Choosing the HTML (or txt) format
- applying an online translation webpage. Google's translation service has no Hungarian option yet, but Morphologic's Hungarian-English & v.v. translation service webforditas.hu works quite well. The page has also an English version where the labels of the buttons and the explaining texts are in English. It can translate texts copy-pasted directly, or HTML pages given by URL.
I admit that translation bots are far from perfection (even the name of Diószegi Vilmos translates to Walnut pin Vilmos), but are in most cases usable.
Best wishes,
P.S. Thank You for removing the merge template from "my" articles Sound mimesis in shamanhood and Sound mimesis in various cultures, and also thank You for making their title better.
Frank Doljack
The guidelines on middle names is to use them if that is what they are called in sources. His full name gets nothing in a google news search, while just the first and last name get plenty. Wizardman 00:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello Stacey
I think this is only adding to the confusion readers may have. This article should just be merged into the Goulash article. All three dishes (bogracsgulyas, paprikas, porkolt) are stews made by braising the meat with paprika. -
That thought had crossed my mind too. But on a second thought… Articles can be too long and too complicated too. Goulash is a big article allready. There is some brief comparison made in it about the different stews with further links, See main articcle, it is not that confusing. It’s quite clear... And pörkölt and goulash soup, are more or less big articles too, also containing quite a lot of information about those dishes. There are only a few genuine Hungarian food articles. Mostly it is Spätzle (csipetke, galuska) or halusky , Klöße (szilvásgombóc), Frankfurter-style sausage (virsli), Rouladen, Palatschinken (palacsinta), Punjena paprika (töltött paprika), Cabbage roll (töltött káposzta) Kaiserschmarrn (császármorzsa), Braunschweiger (májkrém), liverwurst (kenömájas), Strudel (rétes) and so on. All with a little note “this is also a a Hngarian dish”... If we would merge Pörkölt and Gulyasleves it would be even less Hungarian food articles left.- Warrington (talk) 10:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Hunnic language
Hi, it seems you broke 3RR on Hunnic language. Some admins would probably have blocked you now. I haven't, because you were clearly defending encyclopedic quality against a disruptive POV-pusher, but just saying, you should probably not rely on this too much. Better try to call in outside help before you're in that situation. Regards, --Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Saffron again
I am having trouble with a suposedly American user who thinks that saffrron is a typical Hungarian spice. He is adding saffron all the time on Hungarian spices. I am absolutely sure that saffron is not a typical Hungarian spice. Need help!!!
see his new comment on Hungarian cuisine talk page and his last change in the article. He thinks I do not know about Hungarian food!!
Many of the authentic Hungarian recipes he includes use spices like saffron. One must remember that although Hungary today is only the size of Indiana, there are different regions of the nation. The food in the Dunantul is not the same as on the Alfold. The food in the far south and Serbia is not the same as the Felvidek (north) and Slovakia
Warrington (talk) 09:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Micro-Altaic
Hi, Stacey, By the way, I am not sure Micro-Altaic is as dead as all that. What I posted on the Altaic talk page is for the public arena, where there is a terrible polemic raging over whether Altaic is a respectable category or not - the need is to get the factual points across that (a) some linguists still support Altaic and (b) those who do all include Korean and nearly all Japanese. My personal view is that, if Altaic is a valid category, there is a very good chance that it should be subgrouped into a Turkic-Mongolic-Tungusic branch and a Korean-Japonic branch, representing the first split in the Altaic family. This would bring back Micro-Altaic, though it would be part of a larger family. VikSol (talk) 21:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Komondor
Now do you think this dog is a representative Komondor? This kid have seen this picture on Westminster Dog Show article on Wikipedia and now he is editwarring that the Komondors are small dogs and this picture is absolutely correct, just because this animal has been shown at the Westminster Dog Show, and that means that this can not be wrong. First I thougt this dog was a Puli. I was arguing miles about this stupid picture on that talk page, that it is misrepresenting the Komondor breed, and gives the wrong idea about the breed, and indeed it does. I was trying to put a remark in the picture that this is a small dog but he constantly reverts it. And keers adding Komondorok.
Warrington (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Now the kid goes and makes adits like this:
(I copied his last version:)
Appearance, Size, and Proportions
The Komondors appearance is dignified and commands respect, people unfamiliar with the breed are often surprised by how quick and agile the dogs are.
The AKC Breed Standard states the following for size, weight and proportions of the Komondor:
Males 27½ inches and up at the withers; Females 25½ inches and up at the withers. Males are approximately 100 pounds and up, Females, approximately 80 pounds and up at maturity, with plenty of bone and substance. While large size is important, type, character, symmetry, movement and ruggedness are of the greatest importance and are on no account to be sacrificed for size alone. The body is slightly longer than the height at the withers. Height below the minimum is a fault.
The Fédération Cynologique Internationale Hungarian Standard states the following for size weight and proportions of the Komondor:
IMPORTANT PROPORTIONS
• The body length sligthly exceeds the height at the withers.
• The deepest point of the brisket is approximately on a level with half of the height at the withers.
• The muzzle is slightly shorter than half of the length of the head.
HEIGHT AT WITHERS
Males: Minimum 70 cm.
Females: Minimum 65 cm.
WEIGHT
Males: 50 – 60 kg.
Females: 40 – 50 kg.
The breed shows few faults in type and is largely uniform as it has always been bred with the same target.
Who cares about the American Komondor Club standard? This is a Hungarian dog, and it is also as I found out a Hungarian national tresure, what adoes it matter what the Acf says.
It shoul not be put there as a first referrence, and the edits are lousy, and he probably have never seen a Komondor all his life.
Warrington (talk) 13:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Just let me add a clarification. The Komondor article is edited wery seldomly indeed, and I still think that it is strange that suddenly four newly created accounts which do not edit anything else but Komondor related topics, all of the sudden appear one after the other, and start working in the same direction, supporting each other in all ways. Because of one picture taken at Westminster Dog Show and used at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show article.
And all of them are referring to a certain Komondor dog called Quincy, (which is said to be the one in that picture). All accounts try to adjust the Komondor dog article to make it sound like the breed is smaller and with a longer body, which means, to look more like the dog in that picture.
A dog the accounts and IP might be related to (thoug they deny this), or like this dog, which the accounts all call Ouincy, a smaller Komondor dog with a longer body than the international standards calls for.
User(s) repeatedly removed relevant and sourced facts.
Combined IP adress :70.121.204.57 and red link User:Meoconne assisted by User:Lynovella, repeatedly reverted edits at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show and Komondor dog breed articles, and removed facts from the Komondor article, such as: the dog breeds average height (30 inch), the fact that no upper height limit is given.[1] leaving only minimum height (and even other relevant and sourced breed caracteristics too). Both average height (sourced) has been removed, (several times), , upper limit height (sourced) , mentioning other similar Hugarian sheepdogs , which all of them are relevant information for this encyclopaedia article on this dog breed, and when I (and even ClueBot) put them back he keeps removing them again , and makes quite a few unhelpful edits instead , removing reference title, without any consensus.
This is both Wikipedia:Edit war, and disruptive editing , .
This edit was also copright violation, an exact copy from the FCI Komondor Standards , poorly formulated edit added upper case The above mentioned newly created new red link user accounts are all editing the same articles, Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show Komondor and nothing else.
They are all concentrated on the same issue at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show and Komondor dog breed, trying to adjust the article to show that Quincy is a perfect dog according to the breeds standards.
This user(s) was editing the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show and the Komondor dog article as an IP adress, IP adress 70.121.204.57, than under one username, User:Meoconne He or she probably also edits the Komondor article and talk page as User:Lynovella and continues in the same time as IP adress 70.121.204.57.
It is also possible that the account User:Goldie102 has been created to support this issue around this dog, see edit .
They were trying to ignore breed standard, other sources and pictures presented in argumentation on the talk page .
This breed being fairly unknown, not many people check that article, or try to defend it from bias .
Warrington (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)





















