User talk:ShrimpsAreTasty

Hi ShrimpsAreTasty! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Pbritti (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much Pbritti, I'm enjoying my editing on Wikipedia. Thank you very much! ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 16:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

The article God's Revelation to the Human Heart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I've been unable to establish notability for this work. The citations given are to a blog ("Patristic Faith"), Goodreads, and a number of sales listings. On performing my own search, I found one mention in an academic article but nothing else significant to work with.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

The article The Orthodox Word has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A charming little periodical but not notable. Aside from "searchgoodbooks", a review blog, no sources cited are independent of the magazine, nor was I able to find any independent sources on search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, The Orthodox Word, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Saint Herman of Alaska Monastery. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

@ Hello! Sorry for the confusion with the article; I'm generally not the best with Wikipedia and I'm still learning a lot! I wish to learn how to create standalone pages with reliable sources. I feel like The Orthodox Word page can have potential, but I still need to learn a lot. Since I'm not a professional, I'll leave you with the decision for that article. Thank you! ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:The Orthodox Word Front Cover Magazine Vol. 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article God's Revelation to the Human Heart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God's Revelation to the Human Heart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Justiyaya 08:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:God's Revelation to the Human Heart (300px).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Please see WP:LQ. You are switching many quotations marks away from the above style, which is what we use on Wikipedia. Remsense 🌈 论 18:19, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

@Remsense My bad. I'm new to Wikipedia. Let me know if anything else needs changing back! ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to St. Gilbert's Catholic Church when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:41, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

@Zackmann08 Thanks for letting me know. I'll do better next time. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

All good. That is a weird template. It really should allow for underscored parameters... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:38, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

@Jlwoodwa Which article is it? ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 22:03, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Many articles, but to pick one arbitrarily, Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 § Reception seems rather AI-generated: The continued importance of the Act within the wider frame of road-traffic enforcement is reflected in the legion of subsequent parliamentary bills amending it. is cited only to https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmbills/010/05010.1-7.html, which says nothing of the sort. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

@Jlwoodwa My apologies. I haven't used any AI tools, but my vocabulary reflects it sometimes. I tried to signify the importance of the act and tried to implement Encyclopedic language into the text, but overlooked some basic rules. Again, I won't excuse myself but all I can say is that I dont use AI tools anymore (I used to when first joined but I've abandoned using it). I'm still quite new to Wikipedia so I need help with formatting, which I try to research daily. How can you help me? If you can't, that's okay, just tell me what else I need to do :) ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 22:15, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

I recommend reading Wikipedia:No original research. Wikipedia is a tertiary source – we doesn't directly analyze or interpret primary sources, we summarize the analysis and interpretation done by secondary sources. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:50, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

@Jlwoodwa Thank you. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

@Jlwoodwa I've amended the Reception section under that article. Is it okay if you have a look and see if this is done correctly so that I can have some feedback? If so, I can then try to see if any of my other articles contain the same language and I'll amend those as soon as I can :) ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eudokia (wife of Justinian II), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New England. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Creating multiple pages deserves an award especially for new ec confirmed users Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! I appreciate the recognition and will continue contributing to Wikipedia. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 18:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Barupe Primary School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:54, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I came across this article while doing new page patrol, and had to move it to drafts to avoid deletion. To establish notability per WP:ORG, we need to see significant coverage, directly of this school, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject. The sources cited do not meet that guideline.

I'll also add that the vast majority of schools are not notable, and for primary schools especially notability is vanishingly rare. I'm not saying categorically that this school couldn't be notable, only that it would be quite remarkable if that were the case. Still, perhaps you can find sources to prove otherwise. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for this head's up! I decided to take part in translating and adding information to this article as it was my mother's and my own school when I was a child. I'll do my best in finding information about it, and since I've only started yesterday, I hope I can find some notable sources.

Again, thank you, and if there's anything I'm doing wrong then please let me know. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 17:04, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Additionally, is it possible to transfer/rename the draft to "Barupė Primary School" rather than Barupe Primary School, as it is inaccurate without the accent. If that's not possible, should I then wait until (if) the draft is published live? Thank you! ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

I've done that (moved the page) for you, it is now Draft:Barupė Primary School. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi ShrimpsAreTasty. Thank you for your work on Road Traffic Act 1972. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

What's not to love about an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom! Clear and focussed, although as another editor notes, rather dependent on government sources. A few more from independent sources, such as perhaps building the 'reception' section, might be helpful.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@Klbrain Noted. I'll try. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi ShrimpsAreTasty. Thank you for your work on Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Consistent with others in the series; thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@Klbrain Thank you ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 20:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ArthurTheGardener was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barupė Primary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ArthurTheGardener (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll do my best. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 12:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ShrimpsAreTasty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ArthurTheGardener (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

thank you for the recent edit of Ashkenazi Jews. It seems like the start of the page is broken so I will be glad if you can take a look. Avy42 (talk) 22:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

@Avy42 It doesn't seem broken to me. How is it broken? ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Update: a different editor changed it saying (removed) "placed reference at the top of the article, feel free to add back where it was originally intended". Take a look at history because just now a displaced source by you was removed. Avy42 (talk) 23:06, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I see it has already been fixed, but yes, that was accidental. I didn't double-check if it was formatted correctly. Thanks ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 10:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi ShrimpsAreTasty. Thank you for your work on Hans Gestrich. Another editor, Kudpung, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please consider translating and using the items you have linked to the German Wikipedia. It's not common to leave a lot links like these,a nd some of that linked material in other Wikipedias may not be adequately sourced for our strict requirements.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Hello. Thanks for the heads up. I'll take that advice. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 07:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, LEvalyn, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the book meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for books. The draft requires either:

• evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for books

or multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the book in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the book, such as press releases, the author or publisher's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

our criteria for book articles require at least two reviews of in-depth published analyses (self-published blogs and user-generated Goodreads reviews do not count). Zero such sources are provided here.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:God's Revelation to the Human Heart to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 04:15, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

@LEvalyn Thank you. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 07:08, 3 May 2026 (UTC)