Wikiwand AI

User talk:SomnambulantFish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi Z-Astro3! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sid95Q (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Regarding AI usage on Wikipedia

Hi there, Z-Astro3, and let me also extend you a warm welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that on the article No. 462 Squadron RAAF you used ChatGPT to add information without reviewing it yourself. This is evident because of the "utm_source=chatgpt.com" appended to your source which shows you copied the link directly from ChatGPT.

I'd like to direct you to Wikipedia's guidelines on using AI to edit Wikipedia. In summary; do so sparingly and carefully, and verify everything that ChatGPT tells you to make sure it's true. I.e., in this case, if you use ChatGPT to find a source, make sure you first read the source and verify that it actually contains the information that ChatGPT claims it does before you submit it to Wikipedia.

In this case it seems that the source does in fact contain the claimed information, so I haven't reverted your edit or anything, I just wanted to make you aware, because it's very common for new editors to misuse AI in a way which ends up contributing negatively to Wikipedia.

Thank you! Athanelar (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

I knew it was a reliable source but I couldn't get the link so I used ChatGPT. :] Z-Astro3 (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Z-Astro3! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to find the guidelines on making/editing pages?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Z-Astro3! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Overly used Peacock Prose?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 05:02, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Z-Astro3! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Citing PDFs, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 05:03, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:457953 Kejimkujik has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:457953 Kejimkujik. Thanks! EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 20:13, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:497593 Kejimkujik has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:497593 Kejimkujik. Thanks! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 497593 Kejimkujik (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The statement that a minor planet appears in front to the constellation Pisces seems wrong. The description appears to indicate that the object is in orbit around the Sun. If so, the object should appear to be in Pisces for a period of a few months as it orbits around the Sun. Was it in Pisces when it was discovered?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, SomnambulantFish! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 497593 Kejimkujik has been accepted

497593 Kejimkujik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to WWWW, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:12, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to 885 Ulrike. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opus Magnum (disambiguation) (March 13)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:
A Dab page with only two entries are usually seen as unnecessary by the community, especially when one entry is a clear Primary topic (in this case, Opus Magnum which has received ~80x as many page views than Opus Magnum (album) in the last 30 days).

Both entries are already included as hatnotes at opus magnum and their respective pages, and are also both listed at Magnum opus (disambiguation).

If additional topics with the same name emerge, then a dab page may become appropriate :)

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Opus Magnum (disambiguation) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

nil nz 03:23, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Help Desk

While I don't doubt that your intentions are good, it would probably be better for you not to answer questions on the Help desk until you have a much better understanding of how Wikipedia works. This edit in particular is ill-advised, and liable to waste people's time at WP:ANI (see my response to it) AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Dhanoa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dhanoa. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 08:08, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhanoa has been accepted

Dhanoa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 08:19, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:497700 MacDougall

Information icon Hello, SomnambulantFish. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:497700 MacDougall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 5547 Acadiau (July 1)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
None of these sources is the kind of independent secondary source with in depth coverage that we need.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:5547 Acadiau to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Stuartyeates (talk) 07:57, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Opus Magnum (disambiguation)

Information icon Hello, SomnambulantFish. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Opus Magnum (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks