User talk:Square~ruwiki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:25, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Square~ruwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Talk:Digital marketing, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Best practices for editors with close associations
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
- The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:29, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Digital marketing. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:36, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- I understand. I'm still learning the ropes here and realize some of my recent posts hit the wrong note. Furthermore, I'll step back, read the dispute‑resolution and sourcing guidelines more carefully, and be sure my future edits are neutral and well-supported before I bring them up again.
- Thanks for the heads‑up. Square~ruwiki (talk) 10:44, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- If you continue to mark the edit request as unanswered or communicate using an LLM you will be blocked for disruptive editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, ScottishFinnishRadish!
- In your last message you were pretty blunt, and I’d like to clear the air. I don’t use automated tools to write those notes, and I won’t touch the edit‑request template again. If anything I said seemed computer‑generated, that was my fault for phrasing it badly.
- What I still don’t know is what thing in particular led to the warning. If you can show me the precise edit, or line, that I left in the contretemps, I’ll see to it that I avoid repeating that mistake. I’m not here to cause trouble; I’m not sure about how it works and truly want to help without slapping additional work on people.
- And thanks for any insight you can provide. Square~ruwiki (talk) 11:28, 29 July 2025 (UTC)