User talk:Blitz 1

What do you mean by not here to build an encyclopaedia? Yes, I might make some edits what the majority of Wikipedia does not want, but am I immediately doomed to being "not here to build an encyclopaedia" after that? The answer should be absolute no. I am not obliged to anything. I am one of those occasional users who build articles or edit them, I am not a Wikiholic or a person who vandalises. I have dealt with this same problem before, and I do not understand why the hell are you doing this to me? Sturm 1 (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

This is an angry rant that shows you don't have, and aren't likely to have, the right mindset to edit Wikipedia. It also seems like this isn't your first account("I have dealt with this same problem before"). 331dot (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

I might make some edits what the majority of Wikipedia does not want, but I should not be doomed because of it. I am one of those occasional users who build articles or edit them, I am not a Wikiholic or a person who vandalises. I have dealt with this same problem before, and I do not understand why are you doing this to me? Therefore I appeal this. And PS. this is not a rant or an angry one. I am calm when writing this. I promise not to do whatever I was blocked for again. Thanks for understanding. Sturm 1 (talk) 13:12, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

This does not attempt to address the concern around multiple accounts, nor is it meaningfully different from your previous, declined, unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

OK so I am one of those Wikipedia users who occasionally use Wikipedia and edit or create articles, without being active every day etc, so my edits might not always be matching the standards, and I am still learning, and my edits might be even about radical stuff but I am doing the absolute best to keep it appropriate and matching the standards. I wish I could answer the previous appeal comments but I can't so I will have to appeal the third time. So now let's get to the concerns of "dealing with this before" and so, I want to say that yes, I have dealt with this blocking stuff before, but only on this account but it hasn't ever happened on English Wikipedia, it has happened on the Finnish Wikipedia and it happened in May 2022 and was eventually settled as I learnt the standards of Finnish Wikipedia. English Wikipedia is not something I use often so I don't know many standards, so that's why my edits can be unmatching compared to the standards. I apologise for any "disruptive" edits I potentially have made, I won't do those again. I agree I should start learning the standards of English Wikipedia more before editing, that's what I'm going to do if you approve my appeal. I am really sorry for anything. I wish you all can understand and maybe unblock me. Yeah I can't really know what will follow this appeal but I hope the concerns were explained and all that. I am not ranting or anything. Thank you for reviewing this appeal whatever ending it will bring. If this gets denied, I will just serve the indefinite time and maybe appeal in the future, but I made my points now. Thanks. Sturm 1 (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. I was blocked because Wikipedia administrators have got the mindset that I am not here to build an encyclopaedia. I checked my past edits on English Wikipedia and did find out that my editing history is not the cleanest. I completely understand why was I blocked and with full confidence, I can promise that I will in the future, fully read all guides to editing and edit appropriately. I know, I should have done this before, but now I am one hundred percent serious. I am definitely not here to vandalise. I don't edit Wikipedia very frequently, especially English Wikipedia, so that's why I have been a bit of a newbie here. I only occasionally edit Finnish Wikipedia. And no, absolutely no, my username is not based on school shooters. I despise them and never want to do what they did. I apologise for any edits on English Wikipedia that have not been appropriate. This block has taught me to be more responsible in the future. If you unblock me, I will, and I repeat, will, read all guides to editing in English Wikipedia before I make any of my edits. Already now when writing this, I have read some useful guides. Thank you, administrator. Sturm 1 (talk) 19:25, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Alright. I was blocked on English Wikipedia as I was supposedly not here to build an encyclopaedia and was mistaken to glorify a school shooter. In my previous appeals, I have clarified that I have understood what I have done and have promised not to do that again. I have now managed to arrange my username changed from Sturm 1 to Blitz 1 globally in Wikimedia Foundation to prevent anyone from thinking I would glorify shooters. I have now started reading the policies of the English Wikipedia and have come to the decision to appeal again. I thank administrators for reading this. Blitz 1 (talk) 21:08, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Per below. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:39, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

I changed my username from Sturm 1 to Blitz 1 to do two things: to erase all concerns about schoolshooting "admiration" which has never been the case. And secondly to align with my habit of using Blitz as a pseudonym.

One concern I picked up from the previous conversation was if I named myself after the Blitz of WW2. That is incorrect. I did not choose the username Blitz after politics. I chose it because it looks good when written.

I have no affliation to school shooters, and I have explained it a few times. I believe I have answered the concerns now. If there are more, I request the user responsible for the block to talk with me about them so I can answer all the concerns instead of appeal being instantly denied.

I once again thank all administrators for reading this. I am sincerely saying this: I am disgusted by school shootings and avoid reading about them.

I suggest that you prove it, by taking the standard offer. You are only blocked from English Wikipedia, and may edit on any other language edition, including Simple English. If you build up a history of constructive edits elsewhere, administrators will be less hesitant to approve an unblock. Good luck.

eta: for the benefit of future admins reviewing any requests here: . asilvering (talk) 14:49, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Greetings, En-wiki administrators. I make this appeal once again, after seven months of en-wiki silence, as I would once again like to attempt to reason. Since 24th April 2025, I have been blocked from en-wiki for the commonly used reason "not here for encyclopaedia", and as I have already said before, I might have made some mistakes in the past, and it is completely understandable that you might want to use them as a reason to keep this block, but as both a person and an online user, I have changed since we last discussed this matter in August. And yes, I do understand what I have done and why they may have caused concerns. I however am genuinely interested in building this encyclopaedia. And as for concerns about my global edits, yes, I was once behaving wrongly at Wiktionary, but already in August I negotiated that block to be lifted, and since then, my Wiktionary edits have never caused any new concerns. And as for edits concerning National Socialism/Nazism, yes, that is the topic I study almost every day in my life, since it genuinely interests me, not out of ideology, but out of curiousity. That is why I have been seen making edits globally concerning it. And as for the concerns about my username, as I tried to state already last August, it is not political. I attempted to get it changed a few weeks ago, which failed, though as a fi-wiki administrator noted, it has never caused any problems outside en-wiki. I am also not sure whether you have other concerns, I would love to answer them too, but I have never been provided with the detailed list of them, and at least it looks like if I respond to a comment on an appeal, it is either not noticed or ignored. That might be false, but it seemed that way. In shorter words, I have learnt from the past. My username is not politically inspired, my edits focus on Nazism because it is my topic of interest, and I do want to build this encyclopaedia. Whilst I can not be sure what will be the result of this appeal, I still am hopeful, and also wish the administrators reviewing and discussing this a good day/night, and thank you for reviewing this.

I am not impressed by the edits to other projects, which include edit warring, arguments with nary a source in sight, and a continued fixation on WWII and Finnish national identity. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:14, 20 March 2026 (UTC)