User talk:Tanonero

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Happy First Edit Anniversary Tanonero 🎉

Hey @Tanonero. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 17 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ 14:35, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Guidi (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We need at least two reliable sources containing significant coverage of Guidi, which I don't see here.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 04:50, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Tanonero! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 04:50, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

1938 FIFA world cup - Match times

Hi Tanonero,

for your information, I have added a reference for kick off times at 1938 FIFA world cup from a French sport newspaper edited in June 1938. Please don't refer to RSSSF source as a liable one as, according to my experience, it is full of typos.

Regards, Genland PZ (talk) 12:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Genland PZ: Hi and thank you for your message. If I remember correctly (and I kinda on the fly right now), I actually used FIFA's report (by restoring an archived version), which should supersede any other source. Also, RSSSF is considered highly credible and is used widely on Wikipedia, so there's nothing wrong with using it (but I didn't in this case). Tanonero (msg) 12:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of video game remakes and remasters

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of video game remakes and remasters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:52, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of video game remakes and remasters

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of video game remakes and remasters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

1938 FIFA World Cup - France Belgium goals and general references for statistics

Hi Tanonero,

here two reports of the France-Belgium match from original French newspapers:

Le petit parisien:

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k664578r/f6.item

Paris soir:

https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k7644313v/f7.item.zoom

Here from a Belgian newspaper:

Le Soir

https://uurl.kbr.be/1601733/p1

You can find much more by yourself if you look at https://gallica.bnf.fr/selections/fr/html/presse-et-revues (free acces)

Or

https://opac.kbr.be/Library/detailstatic.aspx?RSC_BASE=SYRACUSE&RSC_DOCID=17172248&TITLE=&_lg=fr-BE (need to log-in for free).

You refer to a compilating site mainly taking informatiin from RSSSF:

https://www.rsssf.org/tables/38full.html

As already told, this is a good work site but it is full of typos and errors and needs to be checked everytime.

A better site for statistics of European teams (even if full of commercial pop-ups) is this one:

https://eu-football.info/_match.php?id=6156

All that said, please revert back the minutes of goals of the France-Belgium match on the 1938 FIFA World Cup page, as the current minutes are not correct.

Regards,


Genland PZ (talk) 12:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Tanonero,
You understand that these "official reports" were created after the "net" available information in recent years, there is no reason to admit more reputation to these pages than to 1938 contemporary news. As an evidence, they are no longer available on the FIFA site. Genland PZ (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
@Genland PZ It doesn't matter if I understand or not. Open a discussion in the places I've suggested and see if you can find consensus through the arguments you are bringing here. That is a pretty ordinary modus operandi. Tanonero (msg) 17:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
@Genland PZ: Hi, and thanks for getting in touch. Besides those sources, the match reports are currently using FIFA’s official match report, which should take precedence over third-party sources, regardless of how reputable they are. If you want to dispute the reliability of the FIFA source in favour of the other sources you are proposing, I’d suggest opening a discussion on the article’s talk page, or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI