User talk:TheObsidianGriffon

Hi TheObsidianGriffon,

and thank you for reviewing my Draft:Invisible Technologies! With your feedback, I've made a substantial revision (diff). However, I still have some points where I’m still unsure.

If you happen to have a minute, I’d be very grateful if you could take a look at my questions:

1. I removed the list of clients per WP:NOTPRICE, but kept mentions of three projects that were discussed in independent media: DoorDash (History, 2020); Charlotte Hornets and SAIC (Operations). Is that acceptable?

2. In the Industry context section, I wanted to show the limitations of the company's technology, but I'm not sure if this is acceptable, given that the CEO himself talks about it on Bloomberg TV (primary source). Is it OK?

Even if you just answer YES or NO to my points and copy+paste unacceptable facts from the article in response – without any explanation — that will already be very helpful. I will address it before resubmitting. Alexandra Goncharik ^-sms- 19:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

@Alexandra Goncharik: Nice work! I recommend avoiding primary sources if you can, and maybe merging "Operations" into the history section if that makes sense. TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

@TheObsidianGriffon: Thank you very much for your review and the helpful feedback! Yes, the Industry content should be removed altogether, since it relied only on primary sources. Also, I agree that operations fit much better in the History section. I’ve made both edits and resubmitted the article, and I’d really appreciate it if you have a moment to look over the final version. Alexandra Goncharik ^-sms- 19:47, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article André M. Levesque, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André M. Levesque until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi TheObsidianGriffon- Thanks for reviewing my draft of the GlossGenius article. I saw in the feedback that the tone was not encyclopedic. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and still learning the ropes…I was curious if you could note a few specific examples I could improve with encyclopedic tone? (I started editing to improve it just now but thought it would help to know if there was something specific!)

Thanks again for taking the time to review, would appreciate your advice/ideas to improve! JamesH97 (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey @TheObsidianGriffon, Thanks for your speedy review of my draft for Draft:Yves Rothman. Kindly see the updated page. You stated that the submission was declined as "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions)". I have expanded the article to prove the subject's long standing notoriety as a songwriter, member of several bands, and extensive history producing music in the public forum. There are now about fifty links and citations from reliable publications reviewing his music and more, including The New York Times, Rolling Stone, Los Angeles Times, Pitchfork, Sony Music etc.. The subject has many mentions all over Wikipedia and I'm looking forward to connecting the dots. Thank you again for taking the time to review, I appreciate you! TAURUSbae (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Please respond to the COI message on your talk page and remove the misleading content from your userpage, thanks! TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)