User talk:TheObsidianGriffon

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Draft GlossGenius feedback?

Hi TheObsidianGriffon- Thanks for reviewing my draft of the GlossGenius article. I saw in the feedback that the tone was not encyclopedic. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and still learning the ropes…I was curious if you could note a few specific examples I could improve with encyclopedic tone? (I started editing to improve it just now but thought it would help to know if there was something specific!)

Thanks again for taking the time to review, would appreciate your advice/ideas to improve! JamesH97 (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Draft: Yves Rothman

Hey @TheObsidianGriffon, Thanks for your speedy review of my draft for Draft:Yves Rothman. Kindly see the updated page. You stated that the submission was declined as "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions)". I have expanded the article to prove the subject's long standing notoriety as a songwriter, member of several bands, and extensive history producing music in the public forum. There are now about fifty links and citations from reliable publications reviewing his music and more, including The New York Times, Rolling Stone, Los Angeles Times, Pitchfork, Sony Music etc.. The subject has many mentions all over Wikipedia and I'm looking forward to connecting the dots. Thank you again for taking the time to review, I appreciate you! TAURUSbae (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Please respond to the COI message on your talk page and remove the misleading content from your userpage, thanks! TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:MelbourneIdentity per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MelbourneIdentity. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Giraffer (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

May 2026 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles