User talk:Txarli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Txarli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to St Joseph's College, Mark Cross. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Pjposullivan (talk) 12:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Comment

Thanks, PJ!

Methinks a few more related pages (to the St Joseph's College site, i.e. buildings, etc.) might be useful:

Louisa Caton, Duchess of Leeds [] — She seems to have been a very significant C19th lady.
Mark Cross orphanage (and connected convent)
Legat School of Ballet [all locations/history]

-CC (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OxRecs Digital (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OxRecs Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Txarli! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OxRecs Digital (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no references?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OxRecs Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:OxRecs Digital

Hello, Txarli. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OxRecs Digital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:OxRecs Digital

Hello, Txarli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "OxRecs Digital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OxRecs Digital (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage in multiple verifiable secondary sources. Interviews with the label's founder (such as the article in Studio-Sound) are primary sources and not independent or reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OxRecs Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Help me! New page rejected

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I've edited and re-submited Draft:OxRecs Digital but it has been rejected since someone says it doesn't qualify.

However, IMHO, the page meets the Refs criteria (the sources are: in-depth, reliable, secondary, and independent).

Your advice would be appreciated. -CC (talk) 16:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined, not rejected.

The notability criteria for companies and organizations are quite stiff. See WP:NCOMP.

For a biography article, inline citations are expected for essentially every sentence. While that requirement does not strictly apply to articles about companies, you will have a much better time with reviewers if you follow it.

You posted this to an IP talk page, where it will never be found. I'm copying all of this to your user talk page. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles