User talk:Uncleangelo

Hello, Uncleangelo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 22:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greatest Hits: 1965–1992, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GLF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cher albums discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:26, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jake Shears, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Closer to the Truth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not update chart positions until confirmed/published by its source, Billboard. Per WP:RS, Twitter is not considered a reliable source, nor are message boards or forum posts. Billboard normally gives a "Chart Highlights" column on Mondays, which will preview select upcoming charts. Please wait til then, thanks - eo (talk) 19:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

I will not undid your version,but I think that if you dislike de Videography page,you should improve it.--88marcus (talk) 01:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, I will try. There are way too many info there, and many are not referenced that's why I included the official video albums on the main albums page. If you want you can check other artists' pages and most albums discographies included video releases. --Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

i own gold and live in the us and can vouch the album is an official release and was released by geffen records as the back of the cd says it is copyright 2005 geffen records so that means the album gold is an official release. if it isnt then Greatest Hits: 1965–1992, If I Could Turn Back Time: Cher's Greatest Hits, should not be on there either as they are released by geffen records too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.24.163 (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

OK, but how did Geffen get the rights to release songs Cher recorded for WB? Geffen had a contract with Cher to release a compilation after they have split, and that was Greatest Hits: 1965–1992 in Europe and If I Could Turn Back Time: Cher's Greatest Hits in US. Imo that is not an official release as the official one happened 2 years before, in 2003... I will check more on this...--Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

i have no clue how they got the rights. but they released it. it looks as though the album contains all the songs from The Very Best of Cher plus eleven tracks, a remix of "heart of stone", which was featured on If I Could Turn Back Time: Cher's Greatest Hits, instead of it being the original version, and "take me home" is extended. but other then that it contains the same songs on The Very Best of Cher, so idk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.24.163 (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heart of Stone (Cher album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• /> Her nineteenth studio album, it was the first in her career to go top 10 in the United States (though she would go on to have four more, ''[[Believe (Cher album)|Believe]]'', ''[[Living Proof (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

I Hope You Find It, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Half-Breed (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The New Normal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aretha Franklin Sings the Great Diva Classics may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"
• !scope="row"|[[UK Albums Chart]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.officialcharts.com/archive-chart/_/3/2014-11-01/ |title=2012 Top 40

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

You appear to be in a slow moving edit war on Believe (Cher album). Keep yourself aware, and I believe page protection has already been requested. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 18:36, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Dusti, that's right, the unregistered user is making the edit over and over again. what is the way to ask for the page protection or to block certain ip addresses. thanks!Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

I noticed you have marked some of your edits as minor, even if they add significant amounts of information into the article. Minor edits are only edits that: fix spelling, or change wording. They are not major additions of content. Please keep this in mind next time you make a major edit. -- Orduin ^⋠T⋡ 00:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Got You Babe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cher Bang Bang.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher -A Cowboy's Work Is Never Done.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher All I Ever Need is you.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher Baby Don't Go.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher Little man.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for these notifications, I will try and add what's needed though I don't really have the experience with the images on wiki, hence why it happened.Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cher feat. Beavis and Butthead.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Please don't mark your edit as minor when you add a brand new message to a talk page. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I have removed the US cash box 100 chart because Billboard is the main and most important chart and I thought it would be misleading for the readers - so many US charts. As it goes for the "Believe" 2013 charts: 1. Scottisch chart is already there: she peaked at #1 when the single was released. Do you want to add every year to the table when the single re-entered the chart? Is it notable that she re-enetered at #91 in Scotland? To avoid long tables, there is info in the table "Chart (1998–99)", because Believe peaked on the charts not only in 1998. But I think we shouldn't change it to 1998–2013 either, in this case.

By the way, I'm not sure if you know this, but "Believe" also re-entered the UK Official Singles Chart these three times: 18/08/2012: 195 (1 wk), 06/10/2012: 125 (1 wk) and 26/10/2013: 128 (1 wk).

The UK Dance Chart is official, but wasn't there in 1998 - so what does this peak at #18 in 2013 say? In 1998 - she would've been #1. The same goes for the Dance/Electronic Digital Songs chart in the US. These are the reasons, why I have removed them last year :) Out of all these charts, I have added today the "Believe" 2013 UK Dance Chart and Dance/Electronic Digital Songs. :) --Max24 (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Many artists have the Cash Box 100 chart included as it was a popular magazine which indicated the song's popularity using slightly different criteria than Billboard. Also, I'm aware that Believe re-entered the UK top 200 chart several times, and those kinds of entries shouldn't be used. However, I do feel that a top 100 placement, which is shown on the official website for both Britain and Scotland, should be kept. After all that is what the charts are about, I mean if it entered at #1 it would surely be added, but in my book a chart position is a chart position. thanks! Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 08 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Got You Babe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack and Jill (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Uncleangelo! I have replied to your comment on my talk page. Cheers, Lordelliott (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Cher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't know what to do about the certification table in Cher's Believe article. I tried a lot of things, and put a help on Cher's talk page, but nobody answer it. 20 million copies is exagerated even considering shipments. Information provide by the record company is not reliable.--88marcus (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Cher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Half Breed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of awards and nominations received by Cher page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi, why is it only showing one certification on this e-mail? Cher has also received 5x Platinum for her album Believe. She could have also had other certifications in Denmark besides those two. What was your e-mail to IFPI Denmark if you don't mind?--Harout72 (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

I asked them if she had any other certifications besides the ones for Believe and that was their reply, quite to the point :). Later, I asked for a PDF but they said they will not be providing info and that I should ask the label. Here's the video where they presented her the awards for both the album and the single, apparently the single is also certified according to the video, and the album is awarded 3xPlatinum here, but that was in early 1999 and it was re-certified later as reported by Billboard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svLEkFl2QeU User:Uncleangelo (User talk:Uncleangelo) 22:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I have a question that's unrelated to my question above, thanks BTW for clarifying the Denmark's certification. Remember this file you provided for Cher's New Zealand's certification? Do you have this book in your procession or it was somebody else's? The reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get hold of New Zealand's earlier certification levels. And if you look at the 3rd page where it says "Column 4", immediately after it indicated the levels for singles, it states "For album figures see above". I'm trying to understand if the levels for albums were higher as it was the case for the singles. So I'd like to know if there is an additional page as it says "For album figures see above" which possibly shows the changes for album levels.--Harout72 (talk) 03:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I contacted someone who has the book through http://www.charts.org.nz He was kind enough to scan the pages for a few artists I asked but I remember I waited for a few months... I guess you can try and contact Dean Scapolo himself somehow, he had a blog with his email address I remember, I did a quick search now but couldn't find it... edit. found this email now scapolo.dean@clear.net.nz - not sure if it's still functional though.

Anyway, good luck, curious to know what you discover! User:Uncleangelo (User talk:Uncleangelo) 23:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Where do you have proof that Doris Dragović in late 1999 covered the song strong enough on Croatian language? I would likely to see that. I have search everywhere, but can not find.--Rkjon (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Cher Bang Bang.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greatest Hits: 1965–1992, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Here We Go Again Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aukland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)