User talk:Vikynet

Hello, I'm Plasticwonder. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Art therapy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Plasticwonder (talk) 20:09, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Expressive therapies, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Expressive therapies, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 20:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Please read the guidance below:

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• You sources, all bare urls seem to include interviews with him, reviews of his music, concert listings and similar. His notability doesn't depend on whether people like his work, follow the link above. The refs for your sandbox version are even worse, mainly wordpress documents
• He may or may not be notable as described above, but your text gives no facts that support that, just a bunch of opinions. You claim he has won prizes, but we don't know what they are and there is no reference for that.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• Your text is basically all reviews and opinions, including his, hardly independent and make the whole thing an extended promo *Rule and Case* as “vibrant and genre‑defying” and highlighted its balance between tonal precision and ambient textures... He stated: > "Every piece I write comes from a particular moment of my life — an emotion, a meeting, a walk, a picture or a photo that I’ve seen." ... imaginative contrasts between chamber clarity and ambient soundscapes.... music has been acknowledged by international media such as BBC Radio and KEXP. (no refs to those though) ... evoke atmospheric resonance. According to the artist, the album is “a personal journey through forests, glaciers, and silence.”

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

• I didn't check.

You had no wikilinks, such as Verona, [[jazz].

You appear to have written your text with a LLM such as ChatGPT, please don't do that.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI.

I see that you have already been warned about your editing. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:15, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello Jimfbleak,

Thank you for your detailed and helpful message. I understand the concerns raised and appreciate your taking the time to explain them clearly.

To clarify my role: I am not Lorenzo Masotto, nor his agent or family member. I’ve been involved in organizing a concert where he performed, which prompted my personal interest in documenting his work. I now understand that this may fall under a conflict of interest, and I will disclose it clearly going forward.

I also recognize that the draft I submitted did not meet the notability or sourcing criteria. You are absolutely right — most of the previous sources were based on reviews or artist interviews, which are not suitable as proof of notability. I will only include significant coverage from reliable, independent, third-party sources in the future, and avoid blogs, Bandcamp, or any self-edited platforms unless clearly attributed and used with care.

Regarding tone, I see now how the phrasing came off as promotional. I will try to revise to ensure a neutral, encyclopedic style, avoiding reviews and subjective descriptions.

As for your point about AI — while I used generative tools to help organize some background materials externally, I fully accept that direct ChatGPT drafts are not acceptable for article text and will refrain from doing so. Any future versions will be fully rewritten in my own voice, respecting community guidelines.

I would like to ask: if I do find a few verifiable, independent sources (such as interviews or features in major music publications), would it be acceptable to start again in my sandbox and request feedback before submitting?

I’m here to learn and contribute respectfully, and I genuinely value your guidance. Vetch~ruwiki (talk) 15:42, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

I'm not promoting or advertising anything, I'm just adding information, being an independent contributor. Vetch~ruwiki (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Smallangryplanet were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review the citations for hallucinatory links and non-existent content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clemens Christian Poetzsch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Vikynet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Smallangryplanet (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for reviewing the draft.

I would like to clarify that the subject meets the notability criteria for musicians (WP:MUSICBIO) and is covered in multiple independent, reliable secondary sources. Examples include:

– London Jazz News (reviews and festival reports):

https://londonjazznews.com/2014/10/20/review-roberts-menzel-clemens-poetzsch-quartet-in-islington/

https://londonjazznews.com/2017/08/06/festival-report-2017-manchester-jazz-festival-4th-august/– MeetTheArtist.online (profile interview):

https://meettheartist.online/2019/02/01/christian-clemens-poetzsch-composer-pianist-producer/– Doug Thomas (independent reviews):

https://www.dougthomas.co.uk/with-clemens-christian-poetzsch

https://www.dougthomas.co.uk/the-soul-of-things– Brno Daily (news article from independent media):

https://brnodaily.com/2025/09/02/culture/two-concerts-from-prominent-european-pianists-to-take-place-at-besedni-dum-in-october/

I will now integrate these sources into the draft and add a Reception section. Thank you for your guidance. Vikynet (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Please be careful not to remove previous decline notices and comments from drafts. They should stay until the draft is accepted. When you resubmit, you should do so by clicking the blue "Resubmit" button, not by manually adding a submission code – the manual submission made Draft:Clemens Christian Poetzsch impossible to review, so I have fixed the submission template for you. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 11:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thanks a lot for clarification and help! I will translate to more languages so it have been very helpful ~2025-37827-97 (talk) 11:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clemens Christian Poetzsch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:41, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the detailed feedback. My intention was to provide English translation of the German article. I understand the concern regarding LLM-style writing, but I followed the recommendations of other editors. I will substantially rewrite the draft by working directly from the cited reliable sources, reducing generalized language and ensuring each statement closely reflects the sources. I will resubmit only after this has been addressed. Vikynet (talk) 22:16, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

@Vikynet! Happy New Year! Wishing you a year filled with knowledge, collaboration, and meaningful contributions. Thank you for your dedication to building free, reliable, and accessible knowledge for everyone around the world. May the new year bring you inspiration, successful edits, respectful discussions, and strong community spirit. Here’s to another year of improving Wikipedia together! Warm regards, — A fellow Wikipedian, Thanks! Happy birthday editing! (Iluziya7 (talk) 15:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm wishes - they really mean a lot. Wishing you a peaceful and inspiring year ahead, with constructive exchanges and many rewarding contributions. I’m grateful to be learning within this community. Vikynet (talk) 15:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@Vikynet. Oh, thank you for your wonderful and heartfelt thoughts, we are not alone, this is Wikipedia - our global community! (Iluziya7 (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2026 (UTC))