User talk:Wikipicked

Greetings!

I have noticed that you accidentally removed content in the infobox where the [[File:AISA flag.svg|25x25px]] [[All India Students' Association]] appeared. This okay because accidentals and mistakes happen, trust me, I've done worse.

I just want to let you know that you can add it back. The only reason why I'm not adding it myself is because it would be an ECP violation.

Thanks, and happy editing! ~2026-41116-97 (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sarsenet. A comment that you recently posted to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calls for autonomy in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Editors should not use LLMs to write comments generatively. Communication is at the root of Wikipedia's decision-making process, and it is presumed that editors possess the ability to come up with their own ideas. Your comment may have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 02:04, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Star Mississippi 14:06, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry? I don't see why I was blocked. I haven't made a single edit since the warning? and what implies that I am UPE? I literally edit wikipedia on my own.

I am sure this block is incorrect.

I literally raised talk page discussions, tried to learn from wiki, contacted other editors regarding new page creation suggestions.

This is confusing. I don't even see any complaint. Can you give an input on the exact reason why I was blocked. This notice appears like a default template. @Star Mississippi Wikipicked (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Also about disruptive editing? I request you to kindly point out where so that I will be able to understand where exactly it was disruptive? My politeness may not be misunderstood for LLM. Wikipicked (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

That you have chosen to disregard the complaints until you were no longer able to edit doesn't mean they don't exist. Please use this time away to learn how to edit productively and collaboratively. Continued wikilawyering as you also did here will not help. Star Mississippi 16:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I am genuinely trying to understand the concerns so I can avoid repeating them.

I understand the concern regarding AI generated discussion comments, and I will avoid using AI to write discussion posts in the future.

What I am still unclear about are the other reasons given for the block. The block log mentions both disruptive editing and likely UPE. I have never edited for payment or on behalf of any person, company, or organization, so I am honestly confused about the UPE concern. To my knowledge, my only deleted contribution was a single draft so I would really appreciate it if you could explain what led to that conclusion.

I mean, like, literally, editing on Wikipedia feels like a therapy in a good way. Helping people around. But this is unnecessary to mention here. Ermm.

Likewise, could you also point me to the specific edits or pattern of editing that you considered disruptive? I'm not asking to argue the block..I genuinely want to understand what I did wrong so I don't repeat the same mistakes in the future. Wikipicked (talk) 16:50, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello Wikipicked, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gossip (2026 Film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 09:56, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article State Bank of India has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rasha Thadani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CNMall41 (talk) 05:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

The page Srinivasa Mangapuram has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello Wikipicked,

Out of curiosity, I checked for some sources for Fly91. I found more than a few links; if you add them, I think the article would meet WP:GNG, I am happy to help in making it 'approval-worthy' if you require

https://travel.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/aviation/domestic/fly91-celebrates-2-years-of-regional-aviation-connecting-over-480000-passengers-in-india/129694404

https://www.thehindu.com/business/regional-airline-fly91-bags-aoc-from-dgca/article67921360.ece

https://newsonair.gov.in/civil-aviation-minister-jyotiraditya-scindia-flags-off-the-inaugural-flight-of-the-new-airline-fly91/

https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/union-minister-ram-mohan-naidu-kinjarapu-virtually-inaugurates-fly91-services-between-vijayawada-and-hyderabad20260410145856/

https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/fly91-gets-air-operators-certificate-to-start-flights-soon-know-more-about-routes-11709723738758.html

https://www.fortuneindia.com/enterprise/indias-newest-airline-fly91-takes-to-the-skies/116124

Ar1201u1 (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Ar1201u1

I think Newonair is not considered independent source or reliable source because its from government and it actually covers what the minister did.

and ANI news references, I'm not sure if they're considered reliable.

About the remaining references, I found them too but I carefully tried to use proper independent sources as expected by Wikipedia and also keeping in mind of the earlier issues this article had. Like, it was deleted earlier despite having some of the references you gave.

So, I think I tried to keep it clean and clear for reviewer.

I appreciate your effort and attempt to collaborate. But anyways, you are free to improve/modify it if you can address previous issues raised in the AfDs which lead to deletion despite having some of the refs. Wikipicked (talk) 17:16, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

I will add a little, as IndiaOne Air has a page, I guess WP:GNG is not an issue Ar1201u1 (talk) 19:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)