User talk:Windfall Island

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Windfall Island, you are invited to the Teahouse!


Teahouse logo

Hi Windfall Island! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Windfall Island! Thank you for your contributions. I am Zeng8r and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Zeng8r (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Jitterbit moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jitterbit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:PAID articles must go through the AfC process.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GSS💬 19:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jitterbit (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarpon Springs Distillery (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not quite seeing the WP:NORG criteria being met with the current sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 22:41, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jitterbit has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jitterbit. Thanks! ChrysGalley (talk) 22:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, I really appreciate the detailed feedback! :) Windfall Island (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jitterbit (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Plenty of sources, but WP:SIRS requires multiple in-depth reliable sources detailing the company as a whole, rather than routine mergers, acquisitions and financing matters. So something like a company-wide profile in the Financial Times or similar. Also LLM seems to have been used to write the article, with Rule of Three evident in several places.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 22:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jitterbit (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Guninvalid were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources here are simple acquisitions or from investors themselves. Not notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
guninvalid (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

More information Views/Day, Quality ...
Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
58 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Gulf County, Florida (talk) Add sources
34 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Rosamond Gifford Zoo (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Africam Safari (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start LightSurf (talk) Add sources
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Belleair, Florida (talk) Add sources
107 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Safari park (talk) Add sources
501 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Amiibo (talk) Cleanup
33 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Leap Wireless (talk) Cleanup
113 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Xperi (talk) Cleanup
542 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Sprint Corporation (talk) Expand
154 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Columbus Zoo and Aquarium (talk) Expand
76 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Mobile web (talk) Expand
312 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Tomodachi Life (talk) Unencyclopaedic
257 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Bronx Zoo (talk) Unencyclopaedic
50 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Cleveland Metroparks Zoo (talk) Unencyclopaedic
480 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Škoda Fabia (talk) Merge
137 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Barnstable County, Massachusetts (talk) Merge
122 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Sly and the Family Stone discography (talk) Merge
594 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Nintendo Switch system software (talk) Wikify
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Fortumo (talk) Wikify
1,278 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Bharti Airtel (talk) Wikify
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C PSCU (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aerm Ariaentje (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Adam J Neu (talk) Orphan
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start InterVideo (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tangoe (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 6G Mobile (talk) Stub
75 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Mobi (company) (talk) Stub
58 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Safari World (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 1897 California Golden Bears football team (talk) Stub
Close

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:46, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jitterbit (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Somepinkdude was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Somepinkdude (talk) 01:53, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jitterbit (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MightyRanger was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
MightyRanger (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tarpon Springs Distillery

Information icon Hello, Windfall Island. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tarpon Springs Distillery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tarpon Springs Distillery

Hello, Windfall Island. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tarpon Springs Distillery".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 23:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI