User talk:WorldCreaterFighter

Would you please explain your recent edit here where you added material which seems to have been based on a snippet from a book. Can you quote the bit that backs your edit? Dougweller (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Aren't most materials based from the book? Why would the author David Eltis write this in his book if it was not the truth.

David Eltis is a famous author who wrote many books of slave trade including the atlantic slave trade of Africans http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lbf1COddno0

Here is my source: like to the source "^[1] )" The Nogais also took tens of thousands of Russians into the slave markets, and they were joined by the Kalmyks and Kazakhs in harvesting the sedentary Slavs. User:WorldCreaterFighter 10:46, 15 January 2013.

Anything you write must be in your own words - minor changes are still copyright violations. I've had to revert you again. Dougweller (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Which means that if I write in my own words I can use the sources..... Okay I'll put in my own words?User:WorldCreaterFighter 10:46, 15 January 2013.

I see someone else reverted you here. Neither the editor of the book you used, or the author of the chapter, qualifies as a reliable source - please read WP:RS. Also WP:CITE - note that you should have added the name of the actual author of the chapter you were using. He's described as "an Anthrophotojournalist and Co-Chairman of What's A Face Inc.". Dougweller (talk) 11:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Vladimir Lenin, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doc talk 04:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hopefully my recent edit has solved this problem, without introducing false precision. Please sign your messages with four tildes ("~~~~"), rather than using a manual timestamp. You might find the Google Books Tool useful for making citations to Google Books, but have a read about what Wikipedia considers reliable sources in historical articles. The refs that you're adding don't seem to make the grade, and your edits give off the impression that you're a single-purpose account ... except for the edits about the length of micropenises. Graham87 03:59, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand what a "History of the concept" section should include, and added a source claiming that the Mongoloids had the decimal system 50,000 years ago. I've reverted you, added quotes from Brown and started a discussion on the talk page. If you really think Iwata is a reliable source please don't add him again but ask at WP:RSN. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 19:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mongoloid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Genghis Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ati people may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |poptime=est. 11,000<ref>PEOPLE NAME: ATI NEGRITO OF PHILIPPINES[http://www.peoplegroups.org/explore/groupdetails.aspx?peid=7623[http://www.peoplegroups.org/explore/
• settlements like Barotac Vejo, island of Guimaras, Igkaputol (Dao), Tina (Hamtic) and Badiang (San Jose de Buenavista. The famous island of Boracay is still regarded as their ancestral land as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your addition to Genghis Khan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Your addition to Vladimir Lenin has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Adding the exact same text that's found in a book is the problem, not citing the book you're plagiarizing from. If you add copyrighted material again, I will report you to the admins. Citing books is fine, it's stealing text from those books that's the problem. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, WorldCreaterFighter. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Looking further into the book you cited, Through the Eyes of the Pack, by Lorenzo Currie, it's published by Xlibris, which is a pay-to-print publishing company (restricted by WP:SPS), and a self-help book instead of an academic work (which presents problems with WP:RS). You'll want to find a different source for your addition. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

I've removed it. Dougweller (talk) 18:19, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Hazara people. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 03:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hazara people may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• group, consisting of native [[Iranian peoples|Iranian]] and Central Asian elements. For example, [[Qara'unas|Nikudari] Mongols settled in what is now [[Afghanistan]] and mixed with native

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hazara people, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Chamith (talk) 20:27, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.
I have no idea of why you duplicated essentially the same information as in the paragraph directly above, nor what the second change even meant. Please, if your English is too poor to express yourself properly, leave a request for changes on the corresponding talk page. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WorldCreaterFighter and copyright violations. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Forgetting to not steal text from sources is beyond a mistake. After your last warning, you continued to steal text from sources here, here, here, and here. The plagiarism in the Kyrgyz people article was just ten days after your last warning. You either do not know how to not plagiarize, or you are do not care about plagiarism. Either way, that leaves little reason to trust you with the responsibility of editing here. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm 100% sure nearly 1/3 of the wiki pages copied / plagiarize materials from, all I did is copied one sentence not the whole text. In case you didn't know, the socket puppet allegation is inaccurate, Krakkos not just accused me of being Tirgil33 but also accused KazekageTR as being Tirgil34, but KzekageTR is clearly a huge wiki contribute and awarded with many recognition ( go look at his wiki page ) and please look at victims of Krakkos accusations. He assumes to many people as sockpuppet only because they all share interest in same subject https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Krakkos , it is a horrible mistake -- WorldCreaterFighter 18:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

1) You need evidence to accuse others of plagiarism.

2) The issue is not how much you plagiarized, it is that you plagiarized. And even if it was a matter of "how much," you did not just copy one sentence, you plagiarized almost every time you added substantial material this past year.

3) Other people plagiarizing does not make it right alright for you to plagiarize. It just means there's more users who need to be reverted, warned, and blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Aren't all the quotes in wikipedia copied from google books or articles? , I copied text is on the Huns based on Jordanes description which is more quote like and I didn't wanted to misinterpret the meaning, are you saying it's okay to misinterpret it? I copied a small sentence not a huge paragraph although, I didn't wanted misinterpret a quote based on Jordanes description of Huns and Alans. I will follow the rules from now on, please give me another chance to prove to myself that I won't make the mistake of plagiarism. -- WorldCreaterFighter 18:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

There is a difference between quotation and plagiarism. Quotation separates itself from the rest of the work through quotation marks or a quote box, and is attributed to the original author in both the article and in the citation. Since you do not know the difference, I do not think it is a good idea for you to even try quoting. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Okay. Than could you please help me edit and rephrase the sentence on the Huns wiki page based on the source of " Jordanes (126-7) contrasted them with the Huns, noting that the Alans 'were their equals in battle, but unlike them in civilisation, manners and appearance" ( The Sarmatians, 600 BC-AD 450 - Page https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=184176485X ). Richard Brzezinski, ‎Mariusz Mielczarek - 2002 ). This is data way too important to ignore and it gives us extra hints on how the Huns would have looked like.-WorldCreaterFighter 19:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

If you are not capable of doing that on your own, you should probably find something else to do. Other people are not going to be able to help you through every single edit. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Okay than I will edit it on my own. WorldCreaterFighter 19:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. Prose you find online or in books is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policies. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

I only copied one small sentence from a quote based on Jordanes description on the Huns and Alans, I didn't want to misinterpret it. I'm pretty sure 1/3 of wiki is from copied materials from google book and article. You can paste the whole paragraph from just about every wikipedia and paste in google and it always shows it google books and articles. But I believe I was wrong. WorldCreaterFighter 18:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

No, you didn't just do only that one sentence. Almost every significant contribution by you in the past year has been stolen from other authors. Also, your edit was not a quote from Jordanes, it was Brzezinski's and Mielczarek's summary of Jordanes's work.

Also, there are companies that copy Wikipedia articles and sell them as books, which end up on Google books. If you check deep enough into those books's copyright information, you'll see that they admitted to using portions of Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

I've more fully explained my most recent reversion at Talk:Huns#Jordanes. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spiritclaymore. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WorldCreaterFighter and plagiarism, again. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Diannaa (talk) 21:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorldCreaterFighter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

This is not plagiarism..... how is is quoting plagiarism??? and how can you say that when nearly 1/3 of the wiki pages have words similar to google book sources!!!! it is only a very short sentence and you call plagiarism???? I do not understand why I'm being targeted for something wikipedia had allowed in nearly 1/3 of their pages. WorldCreaterFighter (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Whether or not other pages contain copyright violations is irrelevant; that doesn't mean you can add some, too. This is not a new issue and it's rather obvious that you don't understand Wikipedia's stance on copyright. Huon (talk) 22:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Every word you added in this edit was taken directly from the sources you cited.

As for "nearly 1/3 of their pages," you need to present good evidence of this. As I explained before, there are books that copy from Wikipedia, and quotations are fine. I even tried to explain to you how to do quotations, remember? Ian.thomson (talk) 22:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)