User talk:XCBRO172
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Image on Samuel Mitchell
Respectfully I don’t think there is anything that wrong with the image, not only is it based of his grandson and grandfather but by that logic the images on the page Adam, Moses, Abraham etc. should be removed because that’s what the artist thought they looked like (artist representation), the image that used to be on the page of Mozart was not contemporary, the only differences being that they are a couple hundred years older, the image of Pierre Charles L’Enfant seems even more like original research, uploaded by the artist and is a silhouette drawing which (in my honest opinion) doesn’t really look the best. Even the page for Qin Shi Huang has an “imaginary portrait” which I doubt is based of any of his relatives (considering it comes from the 19th century).
Im not trying to argue just addressing a point. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Actually never mind, I guess it’s against the WP:Portrait, although it’s not “imagined” per sé. and most of the time there is a continuity between Grandson and Grandfather. But perhaps I’m mistaken in this regard. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 15:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- You can't just add a portrait that you drew yourself based on what you "think" a person looked like, that would be WP:OR. TheBritinator (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes ok I get it no need to drill it in I’ve already agreed with you on your page, no need to come to another one and say the same thing. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 16:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Also it isn’t WP:OR it’s WP:Portarit, Wikipedia OR is for sources and research, it does say “an image wholly created by a Wikipedia isn’t original research” but that’s not the point. The point is I agree and accept that they aren’t original or Comte portray, but by that logic the image on P.C L’Enfant needs to go. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 16:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I got rid of the image of L’Enfant, the user who added it even said that it was based on an image of his father (similar to mine of Samuel Mitchell), so for 15 years that was untouched even though by the standards you have given me that is wrong, so I’ve deleted it from the page. Hope that helps :) Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 16:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for reverting your edits. While I disagree that this still falls under OR, I appreciate that you are listening. I know it's hard to acknowledge mistakes, but I would like to thank you for finding the strength to do so. Cheers! Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 20:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sure thanks, I don’t mind. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 09:51, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for reverting your edits. While I disagree that this still falls under OR, I appreciate that you are listening. I know it's hard to acknowledge mistakes, but I would like to thank you for finding the strength to do so. Cheers! Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 20:30, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- You can't just add a portrait that you drew yourself based on what you "think" a person looked like, that would be WP:OR. TheBritinator (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
WIkiProject Doctor Who: December 2025 Newsletter
The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume III, Issue III — December 2025 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who Help! We've been robbed... of a new Doctor Who Christmas special this year :(
2025... I Let You Go
*vworp vworp, vworp vworp*
The Space-Time Telepgraph is back again with our final issue of the year. With 13-episodes of Who-related content broadcast in 2025, it marked the biggest year in the Whoniverse since 2017! Take a quick read below for all the Wikipedia-related (and non-Wikipedia-related) Doctor Who news that you missed, and everything you have to look forward to. Happy New Year! 🥳🎉 Would you like a
Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹
2019
2020
2021
2022
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹 (continued) 2023
2024
2025
Notes
Contributors:
If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on Steve Ouimette
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Steve Ouimette, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:02, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
WIkiProject Doctor Who: April 2026 Newsletter
The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume IV, Issue I — April 2026 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who A new newsletter materializing? Quick, help us reverse the polarity of the neutron flow so it can safely land on your talk pages! Don't be lasagna (because there's a new newsletter to read)
Into the Vortex! (Of Good and Featured Content)
A flabbergasting discovery
Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network
Succession
Contributors
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹
If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)