User talk:Pokelego999

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 kB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 212.8 kB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Welp, it's been a good run. I'll get this set up later today. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Gonna leave this up for context and so the entire page isn't blank. Either way, @Zxcvbnm, thank you for the reminder. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Just made the second archive page for my talk page. Any prior discussions between my previous archive and when I post this can be found in Archive 2. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

A third archive for my talk page has been uploaded. Any discussions after Archive 2 and before this post can be found there, for anyone curious. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:58, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction, waterways, and Gu Yanwu
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics
• Olliefant (submissions) with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews
• Gommeh (submissions) with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to Genshin Impact and Honkai: Star Rail

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

RIP the old talk page lol. In all seriousness though, the Absolute Batman article Themes is finally being discussed on the talk page of that article, would appreciate your input. ModlordD (talk) 16:51, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Just an update for you on the Fire Emblem front, since it's been....a while. I've just finished doing the major editing work on Fire Emblem Warriors (lead, gameplay, and release + DLC) after doing the Dev and Story a few months ago. I'm not really feeling able to do the reception right now, but it should be very easy. Sorry if I seem to be dumping this on you, but life's been crazy. I think I'll be able to also manage a similar expansion job on Three Hopes. ProtoDrake (talk) 21:55, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake The article looks really good! It's very detailed and high quality, excellent work! Absolutely no worries on the business, and take your time with things. Life is always the highest priority, always feel free to do things for yourself first. If you need any help with reception let me know and I'll do what I can to help.

On my part, things keep getting in the way of me finishing up Heroes (Similarly very busy, finals are coming up on my end in like, a few days lmao). I hope to finish it soon but it is still in the pipeline for me, even if I haven't worked on it in a hot second. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:25, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake I have just finished work on Fire Emblem Heroes. I will likely do some further touch-ups tomorrow, such as copyediting, before nominating it for GA. Feel free to take a look over it in case you feel there's anything that needs adjusting before a nom. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:50, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake not sure if you've seen yet, but FEH has been ranked as a Good Article. If you need any help with the Warriors articles in the future, let me know and I'll do what I can. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

@Pokelego999 please disregard any fail messages from ChristieBot; I didn't see the disclaimer until it was too late. I promise that I'll review the Fire Emblem Warriors article :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Sorry for the super-late reply, got hooked into doing work on the SaGa series. The FE Warriors article is looking sound, including reception now. I've also started doing expansion to the Three Hopes article -- already did the setting and characters bit, just done gameplay, and I'll be doing the development/release and the lead soon. I'm not feeling that enthused about taking them through GAN, but what I've done should leave them in a prime state for taking forward when you've got the time. --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake No worries at all, great work at the SaGa articles. I'd be happy to take on the reviews and handle them in your stead if you would like, since I understand the process can be very draining. That said though, I'd feel a bit bad about stealing primary nominator from you, since I didn't really do much work at those articles myself. If you'd want, if you don't feel like going through the process, you could potentially be the main nom while I act as co-nom and handle the reviews in your stead, which would suffice for making sure you don't have to worry as hard about the reviews while still receiving credit for them through things like the GAN bot, though that is up to you. Additionally, if you're busy and would like for me to do any finishing touches on article content, feel free to give me a shout and I can hit them up as soon as I have some time.

You've done some incredible work on these articles so anything I'm able to do to help you out/get your credit where it's due I am happy to aid with. Once you've done some work on them let me know what next steps you'd prefer and I'll handle them to the best of my ability. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:39, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Please don't be concerned about "stealin". I've learned to distance myself from things like article ownership or credit. This is a collaborative community after all. And it's not the first time I've done this; Resonance of Fate and a couple of Megami Tensei titles were ones I did the bulk of work on but others took forward because I lost interest or was too busy. I'm not that bothered. And I'm definitely leaving the Reception of Three Hopes entirely to you, as I loathe putting them together. I'll let you know once I've finished my side of work on Three Hopes. --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake If it is alright with you, then I can definitely handle primary nominator then, though make sure to put yourself down as at least co-nom. I'd feel bad about leaving you out entirely even if I'll be handling the review. That said, do keep me posted on Three Hopes, I'll make sure to hit it up as soon as I can on my end once you've wrapped up the rest of the article. Do you have a source bank you're working with for reception? I can definitely do a search if not but I figured I'd ask since it makes the reception building process go by a bit faster if you've already got it built and researched. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:06, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Update on Three Hopes. I've completed what edits I wanted to do. Also re the reception (if I understand correctly), all the sources for reviews are already in the article's infobox. It just needs rewriting. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake sounds good. I'll let you know once I've done some work there; got a few articles I need to hit up first but I'll try to get to it soon. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:00, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake I've given Three Hopes's reception section some work, let me know what you think. Additionally, let me know when you'd want me to nominate the articles, I'm happy to handle it whenever.

By the by, what should we do regarding Fire Emblem: Fortune's Weave? The article on that got created recently and I believe we'd need to include it too if we're nominating additional articles for inclusion in the Good Topic, though the game isn't out for a good few months. I believe we can at worst Peer Review it so it can be included in the initial nomination, and then improve it following its release using the provided grace period, but I would appreciate your input on this. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:24, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

@Pokelego999: I believe for VG GTs, there's a three month grace period after the release of a game, not after the creation of an article on it. That's how it worked with Final Fantasy XVI: article was created literally years before release, but it didn't impact the GT until after the game was out. If we try anything with it now, it'll likely fail. I was thinking about taking on Fortune's Weave myself since it's a traditional one. --ProtoDrake (talk) 08:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake I see, I was unaware of that since for some TV GTs I did it was expected to have it done and improved before a nom regardless of when it releases.

That said, are you saying we can't nominate until after Fortune's Weave? (I assume since it's coming out very soon from now) If so let me know if you need any help when it comes out; I'm happy to provide any help if need be. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

No, I wasn't saying that, or at least I didn't mean to. While it's more convenient to nominate GT additions in batches, they can be done one at a time. Happens with Final Fantasy now. If the Warriors duology and the rest get nominated as GT additions before Fortune's Weave, that's no issue. Seperate from that Fortune's Weave may need all of those three months grace since the developers are being super cagey with interviews and general information. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake I see. If there's precedent with prior passed GT noms, that shouldn't be an issue. For the time being, would you want me to nominate the Warriors duology shortly? That way we can get that batch hopefully done with soon. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

I think this is an instance of "it's up to you". I'm glad to have helped as much as I have. --ProtoDrake (talk) 08:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake I've nominated both, and added a note for clarity for any reviewers just in case. Feel free to tag yourself as co-nom; you won't have to do anything but I'd feel very bad if you didn't credit yourself at all. I'll do my best to handle the reviews when the time comes. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake Fire Emblem Warriors is promoted! The Three Hopes review is currently a WIP, but hopefully should go well in due time. Thank you so much for your hard work on the article, as we've only got one more before Fortune's Weave left to wrap. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:39, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello Pokelego999,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Congratulations, Pokelego999! The list you nominated, List of Doctor Who characters, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

Congratulations! - Today: Felicity Lott. If you have little time, just give me a click ;) - If you have more, see her story. If you have more, listen to her singing Friendly Vision. If you have more, listen until she sings the word "peace" (Frieden), floating up high, serenely. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:01, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

The Space-Time Telegraph Volume IV, Issue I — April 2026 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who A new newsletter materializing? Quick, help us reverse the polarity of the neutron flow so it can safely land on your talk pages! Don't be lasagna (because there's a new newsletter to read) Hello, and welcome to our first 2026 issue of The Space-Time Telegraph. Inside you'll find plenty of information about recent happenings in our little Who corner of Wikipedia. We've also included a plethora of Doctor Who news you may have missed elsewhere in the last few months such as the finding of previously missing episodes, upcoming and recent product releases, a new streaming home for Who across the pond (and even a potential future partnership for new episodes). So what are you waiting for? Go ahead and jump on in! Into the Vortex! (Of Good and Featured Content) Since our newsletter last December, the Doctor Who WikiProject has seen a large amount of quality article improvement. So far, 16 Good Articles have been improved this year! We're at about the same pace we were last year, which is always good to see, especially given the twelve other articles nominated for GA status at present. Special shoutouts to users Rhain for their improvements on First Doctor serials, SkywalkerEccleston for their various improvements across a wide variety of articles, Lbal for their work on Full Circle (Doctor Who), and Doomitron for their work on Sixth Doctor. Additionally, since then, Ice Warrior has been improved to Featured Article status, List of Doctor Who creatures and aliens and List of Doctor Who characters have been improved to Featured List status, and three Good Topics focused on articles relating to the Midnight Entity, the Slitheen, and Doctor Who series 15 have been nominated and approved. Congratulations to all of the users who have improved quality Doctor Who articles in the past few months! A flabbergasting discovery In March, it was announced that episodes 1 ("The Nightmare Begins") and 3 ("Devil's Planet") of The Daleks' Master Plan were found by the charity Film is Fabulous! in a private collection among some films. The collector gave them permission to have them and sadly passed away not long after. Upon learning of the discovery through Toby Hadoke, actor Peter Purves, who starred in the episodes alongside William Hartnell and Adrienne Hill, said "My flabber has never been so gasted". The episodes were shown at a BFI screening (with Purves in attendance) in April and are now available on BBC iPlayer in the UK and the official Doctor Who Classic YouTube channel in the US. This means that episodes 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 of The Daleks' Master Plan are now available. It has been hinted that more could be found in the near future as 95 episodes remain missing. Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network The 1996 American-produced Doctor Who television film was remastered in 4K using the original film reels for a Blu-ray release this May. The restored version includes both the UK and U.S. broadcast versions and new special features. Big Finish Productions recently extended their contract with the BBC to continue licensing the Doctor Who franchise intellectual property for audio stories through 2035. The first new production to be confirmed following this announcement, is a fifteen-part box set featuring David Tennant set to begin releasing bimonthly next year. In February, the First Doctor serial The Rescue was published on vinyl record as a special release for Record Store Day in the United Kingdom. Circuit Breaker, a new multi-platform story starring Jo Martin as the Fugitive Doctor was announced by BBC Studios to launch this June. Spanning audio, books, comics, games, magazine, internet, and Blu-ray releases, tells a singular interconnected story about UNIT's Black Archive across several mediums. Seventeen years after its last release, Character Options is releasing a new five-part set of Doctor Who figures beginning in July. In the United States, AMC+ has secured rights to be the exclusive streaming video on demand host of all 2005–2022 Doctor Who episodes. This era of Who has been unavailable to stream in the States since its removal from HBO Max in July 2025. Noticeably absent from press releases are mention of spin-off series Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures; while these shows have historically been packaged with this era of Who in streaming deals on HBO Max, before that on Amazon Prime Video, as well as Netflix and Hulu in the ancient days, there is no confirmation if these will be included. Elsewhere in America, Classic Who has it's own streaming home on BritBox (yes, BritBox still exists on this side of the pond), while the 60th anniversary specials and Gatwa's era remain on Disney+ for the foreseeable future. Disney has also yet to release The War Between the Land and the Sea, a five-part miniseries previously marketed by the company as releasing outside of the UK and Ireland in "early 2026". There is also no news on where, if anywhere, future episodes of Who will air or stream in the United States (or elsewhere worldwide, for that matter); however, AMC Global Media (the owner of AMC+) owns BBC America, which it regularly licenses BBC content for and was the linear broadcaster of Who from 2009–2022, and a non-controlling ownership stake in BritBox. AMC+ was also previously the next-day streamer of Who episodes during the Jodie Whittaker/Chris Chibnall-era as a transitional period between their broadcast on BBC America and release on HBO Max. Given this, and the global reach of AMC+, it's a feasible home for future new episodes and even the rumored potential of a co-production deal to fill the funding deficit left by Disney. Succession The oldest-living person associated with the Whoniverse since Arnold Yarrow's death in December 2024, Laurie Webb, sadly passed away on 29 March aged 101 years, 327 days. He remains the fifth longest-lived person associated with the Whoniverse and the tenth to become a centenarian. The title of oldest-living person associated with the Whoniverse is now held by 97-year-old Peter Cellier (Time-Flight). Contributors Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) Spectritus (talk) TheDoctorWho (talk) Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹 Since the previous issue was published, a number of people related to the Whoniverse have sadly passed away and some who passed away before the previous issue only had their deaths announced recently: 2022 October – Tony Scoggo, 86, actor (Terror of the Vervoids) 2023 25 March – Douglas Sheldon, 87, actor (The Daleks' Master Plan) 2024 Q1 – Susanna Carroll, 90 or 91, actress (Galaxy 4) 9 December – Julia Burnett, 70, actress (The Hand of Fear) 29 December – Nick Hobbs, 78, actor (The Curse of Peladon, The Ark in Space, "Amy's Choice" and more) 2025 Before 15 February – Geoffrey Keep, 76 or 77, convention regular and First Doctor cosplayer Before 14 April – Harriet Philpin, 73, actress (Genesis of the Daleks) 30 June – Jim Shooter, 73, editor-in-chief (1984–86 Doctor Who comic series by Marvel Comics) 11 August – Mike Winser, 83, OB cameraman (The Ultimate Foe) 14 August – Carol Sadler, 62, camerawoman (some unspecified 1980s serials) 28 August – John J. Johnston, 60, contributor to Doctor Who Magazine 3 September – Keith Hodiak, 75, actor ("The Five Doctors") 7 October – Tony Handy, 91, actor (The Underwater Menace) 1 November – Aidan White, 56, actor ("Partners in Crime") 7 November – Clemente Rezzónico, 90, artist (Daleks, invasión a la Tierra año 2150) 8 November – Geoff Beech, 81, studio cameraman (some unspecified 1960s and 1970s serials) 11 November – Nigel Walters, 84, camera assistant (The Ambassadors of Death) 11 November – Peter Sowerbutts, 76, actor (multiple audio stories) 16 November – Quenton Annis, 84, assistant floor manager (The Ice Warriors) 28 November – Carol Lawrence, 81, costume designer (Chute!) 3 December – John Dillon, 92, actor (The Savages) 8 December – Tony Van Silva, 75, stunt performer ("Tooth and Claw") 19 December – Richard Barnes, 81, actor (Nightmare of Eden) December – Roger Bamford, unknown age, floor assistant (The Daleks' Master Plan) 2025 – Rita Dunn, 92, production assistant (Snakedance) 2025 – George Reed, 91, visual effects assistant (The Seeds of Doom, The Talons of Weng-Chiang, Castrovalva, and many more) 2025 – Jan Spoczynski, 76 or 77, designer (Snakedance) and design assistant (Revenge of the Cybermen) 2026 1 January – Gregory de Polnay, 82, actor (The Robots of Death) 2 January – Colin Bell, 80, actor (The Sea Devils, Invasion of the Dinosaurs) 9 January – Tina Packer, 87, actress (The Web of Fear) 10 January – Derek Martin, 92, actor (Image of the Fendahl, The Romans, The Massacre and more) and stuntman (The Ambassadors of Death, The Mind of Evil, The Claws of Axos) 11 January – Marcus Gilbert, 67, actor (Battlefield, UNIT: Brave New World: Knightfall) 13 January – Paul Grist, 86, actor (The Claws of Axos) 14 January – Donald Douglas, 92, actor (The Sontaran Experiment) 16 January – Hazel Ellerby, 67, actress (Torchwood: Cadoc Point) 31 January – Lorne Martin, 79, props buyer (Doctor Who: The Tom Baker Years) and head of BBC Exhibitions 9 February – Tony Millier, 85, studio sound provider (The Enemy of the World, Colony in Space, The Dæmons and many more) 7 March – Paul Seed, 78, actor (The Ribos Operation) 17 March – Mike Smith, 87, helicopter pilot (Fury from the Deep, The Dæmons) 18 March – Tom Georgeson, 89, actor (Genesis of the Daleks, Logopolis) 25 March – Sheila S. Tomlinson, 100, film editor (Revenge of the Cybermen) 29 March – Laurie Webb, 101, actor (The Three Doctors) 6 April – Angela Pleasence, 84, actress ("The Shakespeare Code", The Curse of Clyde Langer) 10 April – Jan Williams, 87, actress (The Ark) April – Jill Curzon, 87, actress (Daleks' Invasion Earth 2150 A.D.) 2 May – Barbara Kinghorn, 81, actress (The Caves of Androzani) 3 May – Joyce Hawkins, 95, costume designer (Horror of Fang Rock) 14 May – Alan Rothwell, 89, actor (The Twilight Kingdom) 18 May – Tom Kane, 64, actor (LEGO Dimensions) May – Michael Keating, 79, actor (The Sun Makers, The Twilight Kingdom, Year of the Pig, The Evil One, The End) Unknown year Tom Reeve, unknown age, dresser (Full Circle, Paradise Towers, Delta and the Bannermen) Brian Holloway, unknown age, cameraman (some unspecified serials in the 1960s and 1970s) Dave Carter, unknown age, actor (Doctor Who and the Silurians, Inferno, Terror of the Autons, and many more) If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above. If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fifteenth Doctor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:22, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi! :) I've created PokéROM. Was wondering if you can help expanding it? I should note there are other print sources available via Newspapers.com. Timur9008 (talk) 06:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Dam. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#89.

A.Cython(talk) 20:59, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fifteenth Doctor is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pietrus1 -- Pietrus1 (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fifteenth Doctor has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pietrus1 -- Pietrus1 (talk) 07:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I saw that your Doctor Who WikiProject is doing super well. Congrats on all your recent GAs, your list, and the new newsletter! You deserve it. I was wondering, could I hypothetically reorganize the Marvel WikiProject? Whats the process behind doing something like that ModlordD (talk) 01:54, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD There isn't really an official "process" per se, but I'd say the big part you should consider is what you want to reorganize. The Doctor Who WikiProject's revamps have largely been because the bulk of us have been largely likeminded regarding how to handle content, and we have set goals we are all continuously working toward. It definitely depends on how open other editors are to these kinds of changes you propose; one person revamping everything without prior approval is a bit less easy in larger Projects, especially if they've had established structures for a while. I'm a bit less certain about who is active in the Marvel task force and how active it is, but I'd likely try starting small with the revamps before moving up to big stuff. It's also good to start clearing out less active areas of the project or revamping older framework/project areas since those will likely be easier to improve and work with overall. I can probably be a bit more specific with more specific goals but I'd say that's some general advice I'd throw out based on what I have done in regards to the Doctor Who project. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:06, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

ok, thanks for the info! ModlordD (talk) 22:56, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Heroes is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey Pokelego, haven't seen you in a couple months. I haven't really had the time I'd like for the gaming content... anyway, just wanted to drop by and ask if you'd seen the union solidarity petition that's been circulating. You tend to do a better job than I do in terms of sticking to article content, so I just wanted to check if you'd heard about it and maybe hear your thoughts on it. :) Sorry if this is a bother at all. In solidarity, QuicoleJR (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

@QuicoleJR It's good to hear from you! Hope things have been good on your end despite the business. I've seen the petition going around but admittedly haven't had much time to check deets the past few days; I'll take a looksie once I have time to read up on everything, I'm admittedly not as well-versed in wider WikiLore as I probably ought to be. Thanks for the notice on it. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:07, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Heroes has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article The Ice Warriors has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

Thank you for improving article quality in June, including new GAs! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you're into Deltarune, but Chapter 5 releases on June 24! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 08:18, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

I am pretty hype. Just played some earlier, will be continuing tomorrow. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:47, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

The Original Barnstar Thank you for all of your supercalifragilisticexpialidocious work on Wikipedia! I don't even know how to express my gratefulness.

The Barnstar of Existence I hereby award you the BARNSTAR OF EXISTENCE because I appreciate your existence.

Arenghtqru888 (talk) 17:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@Arenghtqru888 thank you so much! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:49, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

no problem! Arenghtqru888 (talk) 10:00, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Please recommend a good keyboard that you like as I'm in the market. You obviously know how to type. Viriditas (talk) 09:46, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

@Viriditas Lmao. For that message I just used my Mac's basic keyboard, but one I liked a lot when I edited on my old computer with a busted keyboard was this one. (Not sure if they sell anywhere else, this was just the first result I got off Google lmao) Not much of a tech guy so hopefully this helps. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:47, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, I had one of those recently. It broke easily. I just got a new logitech, but it's way too cheap and probably won't last more than a few months. I was looking at a nice mechanical, but I don't really want to spend $400. I saw a low-end one for $150 but it had all sorts of flashing lights that I don't need. I liked that it was completely silent (for the most part), which was nice. I heard an interesting interview recently about chorded keyboards, which allows people to type as fast as 500 wpm. That interests me, but I wonder about the learning curve. Viriditas (talk) 23:04, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah Logitech was the other one I've been using. They're very cheap but I haven't had too many problems with them overall, unfortunately I lack a lot of knowledge on more expensive types since I don't tend to shell out for those. Hadn't heard about chorded keyboards until now, they seem interesting but yeah I'd have to second that I'm curious about what that learning curve is like given how unique the system is. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:56, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article The Ice Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
• Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
• A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
• Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article The Ice Warriors has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 05:47, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Philippe-François-Joseph Le Bas. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#101.

A.Cython(talk) 01:05, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Dalek is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gommeh -- Gommeh (talk) 14:22, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Dalek has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gommeh -- Gommeh (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article EarthBound 64 is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monathephantom -- Monathephantom (talk) 23:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Hey, so I am trying to embark on a new project, "User:ModlordD/GAxmen". In order to do this, I am hoping on finding a lot of sources I can use that heavily overlap (like X-Men related books, articles, etc.) to hopefully bring all these articles up to a higher standard.

This will be a super long project, but for sake of my own sanity I won't be working on those articles exclusively; if my interests peaks somewhere else, I work on something else for a bit. I just wanted to ask about the sources and other general advice ModlordD (talk) 02:25, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD What specifically do you need help with sourcing/advice wise? I can give you some general ideas of where to look for sources, but I am unfamiliar with specific sources you could cite since I haven't done much research at all into the X-Men topic area. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Np, I was just wondering if you knew any general X-Men source advice, since in this project I'm doing I imagine a lot of the articles will have source overlap. Sorry for the late response, was on a family trip ModlordD (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

@ModlordD I don't know of any particular, specific sources, since I've done little research on X-Men unfortunately. That said, I would try searching down coverage of the team as a whole. Given the associations of the team and the individual characters and how highly they're linked, I would try finding things discussing the overall team, such as books, article, and analyses. I would also try to find interviews with the creators and/or lead writers at a given point if possible since they'd likely speak on the development process and why particular members were added or not. Not only will this help build up to the main X-Men team article (Which I believe is a Level 5 Vital and not currently improved) but also will help with finding starting points and good bits for the individual members.

That is my two cents, not sure what further beyond that you could go for given I'm a bit less familiar with what sources exist broadly for the X-Men. Hopefully this helps somewhat. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! ModlordD (talk) 20:45, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:04, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors: Three Hopes is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:04, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:04, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:03, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:43, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article EarthBound 64 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monathephantom -- Monathephantom (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi Pokelego999,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Tales of the TARDIS is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IAmNetx -- IAmNetx (talk) 02:47, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Tales of the TARDIS has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IAmNetx -- IAmNetx (talk) 15:07, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

You're invited to join the Organized Labour community editing event, a cross-wiki event taking place throughout September 2026!

The campaign brings together Wikimedians interested in improving coverage of organised labour, workers, trade unions, and labour history. We have confirmed collaborations with Wikipedia language editions in English, Dutch, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and French. If you want to add other language editions or other wiki projects you are strongly encouraged to do so! This event spans geography and languages!

This is a one-time invitation. You're receiving it because you previously signed a petition related to Wiki Workers United (WWU). We hope you'll join us!

Regards ~ Shushugah (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

August thanks

Quick facts

story · music · places

Close

Thank you for improving article quality in August! - Cute story today ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I saw your extensive work with GA for Pokémon, and I was wondering if you would want to help me bring the Pokémon Theme article to GA? Carnival of Lights (talk) 22:33, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

@Carnival of Lights Maybe. I've currently got a backlog of articles to work on but once those are done I'll see what kind of time I have since my schooling is starting back up again soon. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 23:19, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

All good. If you ever want to, just shoot me a message. Carnival of Lights (talk) 23:45, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP. The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month. If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month. This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:23, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Fire Emblem Warriors has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:43, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review 1949 Liechtenstein general election. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#124.

Crestfalling (talk/contribs) 00:16, 29 August 2026 (UTC)