User talk:Zenzyyx

You have some great quotes on your page! Thanks for sharing, Zen. - JGabbard (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

@JGabbard Hey J, apologies for the late reply! Thank you! All quotes I have on my page hold some kind of weight & meaning in my life. It's good to see other's relating to it too. zenzyyx_ (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

I DELETE TOPICS ON MY TALK PAGE ONCE THE CONVERSATION HAS BECOME DORMANT IN ORDER TO AVOID CLOGGING IT. zenzyyx_ (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Why not use the archiving facility? Deb (talk) 08:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 23:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenzyyx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

To the reviewing administrator/s, :I was firstly topic-banned from Azerbaijan/Armenia-related pages for edit warring. Following this, I made the mistake of creating sockpuppets for which reason I was blocked for 1 month and then indefinitely for continuing this behaviour. Since then, I created more sockpuppets instead of honestly appealing my block here. The most recent one was Lenovya (btw, anyone blocked after as a suspected sockpuppet are not me and checkusers can confirm this). It has been nearly 6.5 months since I stopped sockpuppeting, as required of me to be able to make an unblock request. This is because I realised what I was doing is wrong and as a result, I wanted to redeem myself. During this period, I contributed to Wikimedia Commons and especially the Turkish Wikipedia greatly, creating 59 articles of varying sizes and topics. I also did not engage in any edit wars during this period, and I invite an admin to confirm this. ::Thus, I would like to confirm: ::• I will be conforming to my topic ban. I'm capable of doing this and one proof is that even though it does not extend to the Turkish Wikipedia, I refrained from editing any Azerbaijan/Armenia-related articles unless it was for categorisation/adding images of people. Also, I'm not justifying my sockpuppetry, but I believe I did not edit any such pages in my Lenovya sock (though I could be wrong). The reasoning is that I'm not really interested in these topics anymore. ::• I will not sockpuppet. There is no motive for me to sockpuppet any longer as I'm not interested in these topics like before and I understand how disruptive it is. If this unblock request is denied, I will continue contributing to other Wikimedia projects. If I'm unblocked, there would be no case in which I would want to sockpuppet. Either way, I will not sockpuppet. ::• I will create dozens of interesting articles on little-known subjects to expand the encyclopedia. I will contribute to a wide range of existing pages with reliable sources. I will aid in categorisation efforts. ::• I will not edit war if my contributions are reversed. If it is necessary, I will take it to the article's talk page and then to any further avenues (e.g. 3rd opinion). I've come to learn that this method is infinitely more fruitful than edit warring. :In case administrators are still unconvinced and where necessary, I'm willing to accept the conditions of a second chance and improve upon an existing article drastically. Lastly, I want to reaffirm that I regret my previous actions and apologise for all the disruption I caused; which is why I'm requesting a chance to right these wrongs. With respect. zenzyyx (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given the below, it's clear you are still not being truthful with us. I suggest your only hope now is to wait at least six months from today before making another unblock request. At that point, only complete honesty will lead to any chance of a successful unblock. Six months from today is 2026-01-21. Yamla (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's no technical data indicating recent block evasion, though there's not much in the logs. Note, though, that Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenzyyx/Archive shows sockpuppetry in April and May of this year, well within the six month window. --Yamla (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Yamla. As I had confirmed in my original message, anyone blocked after Lenovya are not my socks which is why a user and an IP were blocked as suspected and not confirmed sockpuppets (not to mention behaviours and writing patterns aren't similar at all). During that time, I was active on the Turkish Wikipedia which satisfied my Wikipedia editing desire. I wouldn't have had any incentive to sockpuppet as it would've hindered this process which I waited 6.5 months for. Regards. zenzyyx (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

As the person who has filed the majority of SPIs against Zenzyxx, I think it's worthwhile pointing out that the user that is asking for trust is the same user who masqueraded as other ethnicities when socking , even from this very account they're writing from. There is also a good reason to believe that Zenzyxx was part of the massive off-wiki campaign aimed at disrupting Wikipedia (which led to the famous 500edits/30days restriction in Azerbaijan/Armenia-related articles.), as seen in the email I sent ArbCom on 19 August 2022 (the email doesn't mention the off Wiki-campaign/discord specfically as it predates its discovery, but mentions what was later found out to be its key figures). It also goes into depth about the masquerading bit of this account). --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

I was not involved in such a "campaign" and did not have off-wiki contacts with any Wikipedian, let alone a group on social media.

Aside from that, I believe my appeal addresses any possible concerns and it's best to leave it to the administrators at this point. zenzyyx (talk) 09:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

This does not address your masquerading as other ethnicities while socking. --Yamla (talk) 09:47, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

@Yamla I did this with one sock that had an Armenian name. I do not remember masquerading as another ethnicity with other socks. I acknowledge my mistakes and will not be repeating them. zenzyyx (talk) 09:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

I did this with one sock that had an Armenian name. I do not remember masquerading as another ethnicity with other socks.

Besides the Armenian account Արարատ0, there was also the following;

1. Your sock TheMiddleMan69 is apparently a "proud Brit" with a huge wallpaper of the Queen .
2. Your sock Lenovya has a Russian sounding name, in their userpage claims to be "mostly interested in Russian and Habsburg history.", yet vast majority of edits were not in those articles, but Ottoman-related articles. You were masquerading as a Russian here.
3. Your sock Wallis sabiti has an Arabic sounding name, in their userpage claims to speak dozens of languages, including French and Russian level 4, German and Persian level 3. Turkish is only at level 3 .

Now onto this account;

Here you're of Turkish descent, but you're a Kurd from Syria and the UK, and has ancestry from Iran too? But it says that you can understand Turkish as it was your mother language (level 4). But the official language in Syria is Arabic, and Kurds speak Kurdish as their mother tongue, not Turkish. Yet neither Arabic nor Kurdish was mentioned as your languages.

Then you became an ethnic Jew and proud Israeli who speaks Hebrew fluently???

Then you became able to speak Greek and Armenian at lvl 3 (at a higher lvl). Your Turkish also apparently got worse, now at level 3.

Then you're not only an ethnic Jew, but a proud Sephardic Jew a that.

Then your Turkish became even worse, at level 2.

On this account you've claimed you're "not even a Turk", but I doubt that - I think all this masquerading through this account and the others was part of deflecting the pov pushing you had been causing. How could someone of non-Turkish origin possibly be pov pushing in favour of anything Turkey-related? What's more damning is that one of the leaders of Discord group/off Wiki campaign also played along with this, randomly and passionately defending your "non-Turkish" origins, not once, but twice . It only gets worse when someone looks at my full report to ArbCom on 19 August 2022, I am willing to re-send it to an interested admin. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Joseph Hamon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Zenzyyx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ernest Khalimov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Zenzyyx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Hamon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Zenzyyx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ernest Khalimov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)