User talk:Zinaikazah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Zinaikazah. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Femi Dapson, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 05:42, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Femi Dapson (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:44, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Zinaikazah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:44, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Information icon

Hello Zinaikazah. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Zinaikazah. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Zinaikazah|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello,
Thank you for your feedback. I would like to confirm that I am not been paid in any way to edit this article.
Thank you. Zinaikazah (talk) 12:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
You told Ferien you are editing about a client. That makes you a paid editor. You also claim ownership of a professionally taken image of your client. 331dot (talk) 12:56, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello,
Sorry for any mix up I might have caused, I sincerely apologize. How can we proceed please?
Thank you. Zinaikazah (talk) 14:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
We can proceed by you complying with the paid editing policy, as required by the Terms of Use, and making the paid editing disclosure. Paid editing is fine as long as it is disclosed. It does not require specific payment for editing or specific instructions to edit. 331dot (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for your assistance, I want to confirm that I have added the disclosure to my page.
Thank you. Zinaikazah (talk) 18:51, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
You did. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your assistance. I really appreciate it. I am Sorry for the mix up early. Zinaikazah (talk) 18:59, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Hi Greetings,
Just wanted to confirm the status of the article. I look forward to your feedback.
Thank you. Zinaikazah (talk) 15:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Your draft is submitted and pending. 331dot (talk) 15:58, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Okay. Thank you for your feedback. Zinaikazah (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Femi Dapson (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaCore was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Lack of reliable secondary sources. References from reliable sources are mostly primary and cannot establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaCore talk 13:20, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Femi Dapson has been accepted

Femi Dapson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ŤheŴubṂachine-840✒️ 00:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nouvelle Films has been accepted

Nouvelle Films, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI