Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Will attach users and reporting later, but I did want admins to be aware there is an edit war going at New Party (Brazil). guninvalid (talk) 05:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/~2026-15245-88, Special:Contributions/~2026-16273-02, Special:Contributions/~2026-16467-55, Special: Contributions/~2026-16438-67, User:Czello, Special: Contributions/~2026-15421-39, Special:Contributions/~2026-81618-8, Special: Contributions/~2026-12970-10, User:Candidyeoman55, and User:MarketFruit have been going at it since February. In some cases, such as Special:Permalink/1343712228 and Special:Permalink/1342865560, the editors admit that to a WP:COI over party ideologies. What action, if any, is acceptable? guninvalid (talk) 17:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

The only thing I did at that page was replacing a raster version of the party's logo with an SVG one I found at the party's website. But my edit was reverted along with edits by other users. I accidentally reverted the revert, when what I should have done was to just replace the raster logo with the SVG. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I've checked the page edit history right now. After I inserted the vector version of the logo, most of the edits at the page have been made by Czello. I haven't made any further edits to that page. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, my first edit was 4 days ago (not February) to remove unreliable sources and WP:OR. I then started a talk page discussion to explain these in more detail and encouraged others to join. No one as of yet has contributed. The IP with a COI has simply reinstated unreliable sourcing (including a WP:MEDIUM blog) and misprepresented the sources.

I think including me in this report is perhaps jumping the gun, as so far I am the only person to actually use the talk page. — Czello ^(music) 19:21, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

• Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  This is a never-ending story that led to Vif12vf's indefinite block before, months ago. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  I saw Vif12vf's page, he seems to be a hardcore leftist... Candidyeoman55 (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  I don't think anyone is doing themselves a favor by displaying political things on their user page while being active in politics-related disputes on Wikipedia. That said, it's irrelevant. I didn't mention their block because of politics. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you, for protecting the page. I tried to request page protection, but the first time they rejected it. ~2026-81618-8 (talk) 01:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Page: B. R. Ambedkar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Zalaraz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

The user Zalaraz appears to be getting in an edit warring and is constantly reverting my edits citing that I'm somehow glorifying the subject when in reality I was just rearranging photos by taking inspiration from other articles such as Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. He has previously reverted my edits saying that I am citing unreliable sources however I was citing only from archives, letters and reliable books, he's actually vilifying the subject and the current version of the article is misconstrued and taken out of context to defame him.

Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Please use the standard template, or take it to AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Page: P Company (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: CosTheVampire (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

4. (not within 3RR -- just a "normal" edit war).

Additionally, I'm pretty sure these older temp account edits from December and January are the same user:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: -- though I attempted to resolve it first on their user talk with warnings and received Fuck you Swatjester in reply. Today, I just got a second Fuck you Swatjester. So my interest in any further engagement with this user is now DOA. I will not be engaging with any user who thinks it is appropriate to speak to me in that manner. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:09, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

Not a 3RR situation -- but definitely edit warring to push a POV. Repeatedly trying to blank the (sourced) section about women who made historic firsts related to the unit/course is problematic; claiming that it because a section on women is "irrelevant" is just sexist. Does not appear to understand what "consensus" means per his edit summaries (e.g., "ive given enough consesus about the changes you are plainly incorrect"). Refuses to engage on the article talk page, but has now devolved to swearing at me on his own talk page. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 15:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

• Partially blocked – for a period of 3 months ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Page: Zeus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Abttyr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 09:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Undid revision 1343882454 by Michael Aurel (talk): biased tone removes integrity and objectivity of writing"
2. 14:06, 16 March 2026 (UTC) "Undid revision 1343411534 by Tgeorgescu (talk): biased tone"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 03:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Caution: Censorship of material on Zeus."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 03:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "/* Revert */ "biased tone""
2. 03:45, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "/* Revert */ WP:CENSOR"

Comments:

See also their previous edits at Zeus (slow edit warring). , , , . tgeorgescu (talk) 10:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Blocked indefinitely to prevent further unresponsive editing / persistently disruptively rejecting community input. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Page: Ryota Matsumoto (artist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: ~2026-16837-11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Why are you rejecting when you're not even an administer, 3RRだろ"
2. 13:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "日本人なら分かるんですけど、青子さん酒折さんが散々風呂したのですが"
3. 13:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "rvv"
4. 13:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Already discuss on the Japanese version over four years ago? Also, you know about 3RR?"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 13:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Ryota Matsumoto (artist)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Repeatedly blanking the page to an inappropriate redirect, with unclear edit summaries about suspected sockpuppetry on the Japanese Wikipedia. They also made the same revert three times earlier in the day as User:~2026-16722-09, whose talk page they posted to. Belbury (talk) 16:52, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

• Page protected I also am trying to engage with the editor. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Page: Ali Larijani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: MarketFruit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 21:55, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Didn't reported to Khanenei, other Wiki articles include de facto leaderships too"
2. 21:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Other sources affirm it, will add them."
3. 21:23, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Not speculative anymore."
4. 21:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 21:49, 17 March 2026
2. 21:58, 17 March 2026

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 21:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "/* De facto leader */ Reply"
2. 21:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "/* De facto leader */ Reply"

Comments:

Repeated re-addition of "Leader of Iran" position to infobox despite reversions by at least three users (including myself) and no consensus on talk. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Because there wasn't ever a consensus, maybe? MarketFruit (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I think this has been resolved; @MarketFruit has now stopped reverting and has expressed acceptance of the emerging consensus. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:28, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

MarketFruit, are you aware of the following policy?

The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on editors seeking to include disputed content.
— Wikipedia:Verifiability § Build consensus

~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes. MarketFruit (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

MarketFruit, why did you ignore it then? You said above "there wasn't ever a consensus" yet you restored the material repeatedly. It seems that either you were unaware of the policy or you intentionally ignored it in this case. If there's a reason for that, please share it. I'd like to close this without action but I can't do so if there's no reason to believe it wouldn't happen again elsewhere. A good reason would be you having learned about a policy or you having had a specific reason unique to this situation. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Because there wasn't a consensus then, there was still a discussion. MarketFruit (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

I even wrote in . MarketFruit (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

MarketFruit, the meaning of that policy sentence is that as long as there is no consensus, you may not restore the material. Those who want to include the content must wait until a consensus is found. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh then I misunderstood it, english is not my first language. MarketFruit (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

All good and no worries. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

• Note: No action needed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Page: Marvel's Netflix television series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Hatim . 1996 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 05:17, 18 March 2026 (UTC) "Irrerelevent"
2. 02:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC) "/* top */by erasing irrelevant information"
3. 05:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "Irrerelevent"
4. 02:27, 17 March 2026 (UTC) "/* top */additional information"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 03:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Marvel's Netflix television series."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Clearly not listening to fellow editors and reverting with the same automatic summary. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 06:50, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

• Blocked indefinitely. I'd unblock directly on request and without many questions asked, but I want them to notice the existence of their talk page and to start their first conversation with anyone on Wikipedia by creating an unblock request. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:15, 18 March 2026 (UTC)