Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative music

Good article reassessment for Arcade Fire

Arcade Fire has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Cough Syrup (song)#Requested move 20 March 2026

Nomination of Nope Your Too Late I Already Died for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nope Your Too Late I Already Died is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nope Your Too Late I Already Died (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Good article reassessment for The Dykeenies

The Dykeenies has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:One Day Like This (song)#Requested move 22 April 2026

Planet P Project is still a stub - request review

I hope this is the right place to request a review. The article for Planet P Project was tagged as a stub, originally in 2006. It's still tagged as a stub, 20 years later, after a great deal of expansion. I think it's well written and fully cited. I've been personally involved in this article, mainly about 10 years ago, and I never realized it was still a stub. I think it's worth at least a C. I don't think I should be the one to give it a rating since I was so heavily involved in reworking the page. Would someone please rate it, or tell me a better place to make this request? Thanks. Dcs002 (talk) 03:58, 19 July 2026 (UTC)