Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular Biology/Genetics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to the Genetics taskforce talkpage of WikiProject Molecular Biology.
If you have any questions about articles or are generally seeking advice, you're encouraged to ask at the main talkpage of WikiProject Molecular Biology, the centralized point for discussion, thank you.
- Please remain civil, be respectful, and assume good faith.
- Put new text under old text. (Start a new topic
). - Threads older than undefined days are automatically archived.
 | WikiProject Genetics has been featured in the Signpost. If you wish to get involved with the Signpost, please visit the Newsroom.
30 April 2014 |
Requested move at Talk:Zoonotic origins of COVID-19#Requested move 14 December 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Zoonotic origins of COVID-19#Requested move 14 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 14:24, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
RFC at Talk:Coefficient of relationship
I've relisted an RFC at Talk:Coefficient_of_relationship#RFC:_Should_this_article_have_a_table_such_as_the_one_at_Coefficient_of_relationship#Human_relationships? which didn't receive any fresh participants last time around. Mentioning here since this Wikiproject is listed on the article's talk page. Your comments there would be greatly appreciated. - MrOllie (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Article deletion discussion Continuity Model of British Ancestry
I've proposed that this new article should not exist. WP:Articles for deletion/Continuity Model of British Ancestry. Andrew Lancaster (talk) 10:45, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
RFC on genetics of ethnic group
Please see Talk:Copts#RfC on statement asserting "direct" descent. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
de Bruijn graph
I just now tagged de Bruijn graph with an expert-attention-needed tag. The usage in genomics appears to be in conflict with the WP article; WP describes what appears to be a complete cyclic graph, whereas genomics appears to use cyclic graphs that are not complete. See talk page there. Crudely, "I get it" but the lack of precision is painful. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:31, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Ancient West Eurasians
Hi, I see we have Ancient East Eurasians and Ancient North Eurasian but no Ancient West Eurasians. Seems like quite a big gap, there's plenty of sources on it Kowal2701 (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2025 (UTC)