2025 Virginia gubernatorial election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2025 Virginia gubernatorial election was held on November 4, 2025, to elect the governor of Virginia. The election was held concurrently with elections for Virginia's other statewide offices, the House of Delegates, and other local offices. Incumbent Republican governor Glenn Youngkin was ineligible to seek re-election to a second consecutive term due to the state's prohibition on consecutive gubernatorial terms.

Quick facts Turnout, Nominee ...
2025 Virginia gubernatorial election

 2021
November 4, 2025
2029 
Turnout54.22% Decrease 0.68[1]
 
Nominee Abigail Spanberger Winsome Earle-Sears
Party Democratic Republican
Popular vote 1,976,857 1,449,586
Percentage 57.58% 42.22%

Spanberger:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Earle-Sears:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Tie:      50%      No votes

Governor before election

Glenn Youngkin
Republican

Elected Governor

Abigail Spanberger
Democratic

Close

Neither Republican lieutenant governor Winsome Earle-Sears nor former Democratic U.S. representative Abigail Spanberger received opposition in their respective primaries. In April 2025, Spanberger and Earle-Sears were confirmed as the major party nominees.[2][3][4] Spanberger defeated Earle-Sears by 527,271 votes which is the largest raw vote margin in state history. She won by 15.36% — the largest gubernatorial percentage margin since 2009.[5][6] Democrats won all three statewide executive offices and a trifecta in Virginia's government for the first time since 2019.[7]

The central issues of the campaign were the economy and affordability, which included the federal layoffs from the Trump administration. Transgender rights and political rhetoric followed behind as secondary issues.[8][9][10] President Trump's general unpopularity and perceived performance on the economy, healthcare, immigration, and other issues were viewed as contributing factors for Earle-Sears's loss.[11][12]

Spanberger was elected the first female governor in the state's history, winning by the largest Democratic gubernatorial margin since 1961.[13][14] She was sworn in as the 75th governor of Virginia on January 17, 2026.[15]

Background

Since the 2008 presidential election, Virginia has voted Democratic for president, due in part to Northern Virginia's growth and Democratic trends. In the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris won the state by 5.78%. After the 2024 Virginia elections, Democrats maintained control of both U.S. Senate seats and their 6-5 majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.[16][a]

In the 2021 gubernatorial election, Youngkin defeated Terry McAuliffe by two points, after Joe Biden won the state in 2020 by 10 points. The central issues were the economy and education, which led to Republican flips in all three statewide executive offices and the House of Delegates.[17] In the 2023 Virginia elections, Democrats narrowly flipped the House of Delegates and maintained control of the Virginia Senate due to the issue of abortion rights.[18]

In the 2024 presidential election, Republican Donald Trump was re-elected into office, which Democrats hoped would energize their voter base in the off-year elections. Trump's personal popularity and voters' position on the economy were viewed as crucial to the gubernatorial race.[19] In January 2025, President Trump and Elon Musk introduced the Department of Government Efficiency.[b] DOGE laid off thousands of federal workers, which were relevant in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads, since 140,000 federal workers resided in the state. Since 1977, Virginia elected the party out of presidential power for governor – with the exception of 2013 – which made Democrats the initial favorite.[20]

Due to Virginia's blue lean, the state was viewed as a likely gubernatorial pickup for Democrats as national circumstances were unfavorable for Republicans.[21] The economy became the most prominent issue, while healthcare and education followed as secondary issues.[22] The concern on the economy was based on tariffs and federal cuts from the Trump Administration.[23][24]

Republican primary

Background

On September 4, 2024, Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears declared her candidacy for governor. She received criticism from Attorney General Jason Miyares for making her announcement ahead of the 2024 presidential election. Miyares was widely viewed as a potential candidate for the Republican nomination.[25]

In November 2024, he declined to run for governor and unsuccessfully ran for reelection as attorney general in 2025. After his declination, Earle-Sears was viewed as the presumptive nominee.[26]

Campaign

On February 27, Earle-Sears received opposition from former state senator Amanda Chase and former state delegate Dave LaRock. They affiliated themselves more with President Trump and criticized Earle-Sears's previous comments about him. Despite the newfound opposition, Earle-Sears was still viewed as the favorite in the primary.[27][28]

Neither Chase nor LaRock reached the signature deadline before April 5 to qualify for the primary ballot.[29]

On April 5, Earle-Sears secured the Republican nomination for governor.[4]

Candidates

Nominee

Failed to qualify

Declined

Endorsements

Amanda Chase (disqualified)

State senators

Polling

Hypothetical polling
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[c]
Margin
of error
Jason
Miyares
Winsome
Earle-Sears
Undecided
Cygnal (R)[34] October 27–29, 2024 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 12% 48% 40%
Cygnal (R)[35] March 13–14, 2024 510 (LV) ± 4.3% 16% 44% 41%
Differentiators Data[36] February 21–24, 2023 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 17% 48% 35%
Close

Fundraising

More information Primary campaign finance activity through March 31, 2025, Candidate ...
Primary campaign finance activity through March 31, 2025
Candidate Raised Spent Cash on hand
Winsome Earle-Sears $5,677,456 $1,630,867 $4,046,590
Amanda Chase (failed to qualify) $34,835 $51,204 $1,538
Dave LaRock (failed to qualify) $26,874 $25,813 $1,060
Source: Virginia Public Access Project[37]
Close

Democratic primary

Background

In 2020, Governor Ralph Northam encouraged Abigail Spanberger to someday run for governor.[38] On November 13, 2023, she announced her candidacy and did not run for re-election in the House of Representatives in 2024.[39]

Campaign

In December 2023, Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney, declared his candidacy. His low statewide name recognition meant Spanberger was viewed as the favorite to win the primary.[40][41] There was private pressure for Stoney to drop out of the race for Spanberger. In April 2024 – a year before the filing deadline – Stoney withdrew from the race to "avoid a costly and damaging primary" and unsuccessfully ran for lieutenant governor.[42]

In December 2024, U.S. Representative Bobby Scott, explored the possibility of running for governor, despite doubt from internal sources over whether he would actually do so.[43] In February 2025, Scott hinted he would not run for governor and ultimately did not file a candidacy.[44]

On April 3, Spanberger secured the Democratic nomination after no other candidacies were filed.[45]

Candidates

Nominee

Withdrawn

Declined

Endorsements

Bobby Scott (declined)

State legislators

Levar Stoney (withdrawn)

State officials

State legislators

Local officials

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[c]
Margin
of error
Abigail
Spanberger
Levar
Stoney
Undecided
April 22, 2024 Stoney withdraws from the race
Public Policy Polling (D)[50][A] March 25–26, 2024 734 (LV) 44% 11% 45%
Christopher Newport University[41] January 11–16, 2024 1000 (RV) ± 3.7% 52% 8% 40%
Close

Fundraising

More information Primary campaign finance activity through March 31, 2025, Candidate ...
Primary campaign finance activity through March 31, 2025
Candidate Raised Spent Cash on hand
Abigail Spanberger $16,301,998 $5,297,212 $11,004,790
Source: Virginia Public Access Project[37]
Close

Third parties and independents

Candidates

Withdrawn

General election

Campaign

Ghazala Hashmi speaking at a bus rally in Fairfax with Jay Jones and Spanberger.
Winsome Earle-Sears speaking at Petersburg National Battlefield.

This was the first gubernatorial election in the state's history in which both major party nominees were women.[52] President Trump instated tariffs on other nations including Canada and China. The tariffs were expected to increase prices on consumer goods from companies who relied on foreign imports. Spanberger disagreed with the tariffs and said they were "... a massive tax hike on Virginians — plain and simple."[53]

Virginia Democrats highlighted Earle-Sears's conservative positions on social issues and support for tariffs.[54] After the June primaries, the economy emerged as the main issue for both campaigns. Spanberger's campaign message was focused on affordability: she continued to oppose federal layoffs and tariffs from the Trump administration. Earle-Sears pledged to continue Youngkin's economic policies.[55] After Earle-Sears replaced her campaign manager, there were internal concerns from the Virginia Republican Party over how her campaign was managed. By July, Spanberger significantly outraised Earle-Sears, while there was lack of Republican investment in the race compared to 2021.[56][57]

Earle-Sears's statements on federal workers throughout the campaign were criticized as "self-inflicted wounds" and supportive of President Trump's DOGE cuts.[58] Earle-Sears began to focus on transgender policies in Northern Virginia's schools, which mirrored Youngkin's focus on critical race theory in 2021. On August 21, Earle-Sears's speech at an Arlington County School Board meeting received protests. One protest sign stated, "Hey Winsome, if trans [sic] can’t share your bathroom, then Blacks can’t share my water fountain." The sign received media attention and condemnation from Spanberger and Earle-Sears.[59] Spanberger continued to campaign on affordability issues, which remained the top issue for voters. She campaigned in Southwest Virginia and attempted to win over rural voters who voted Trump in 2024.[60][61] By October, Earle-Sears ran mainly on anti-transgender policies in schools. Earle-Sears ran attack ads against Spanberger which resembled the "Kamala is for they/them" ad from the 2024 presidential election. She spent $2 million on anti-transgender and anti-woke ads, which made up a significant portion of her campaign advertisements.[8][62][63]

On October 1, a federal government shutdown began, which further affected federal workers and became a central issue by the end of the campaign. According to several polls, the Republican Party was largely blamed for the shutdown. Both Spanberger and Earle-Sears opposed the shutdown, while Spanberger tied the shutdown to President Trump's policies on federal workers.[64][65] Political violence became another central issue to the campaign after the Charlie Kirk assassination, which Republicans hoped would energize low-turnout voters.[66] The conservative National Review released text messages from Jay Jonesthe Democratic nominee for attorney general—which referred to former Republican speaker Todd Gilbert: "If those guys die before me...I will go to their funerals to piss on their graves." He also stated, "Three people, two bullets. Gilbert, hitler, and pol pot. Gilbert gets two bullets to the head. Spoiler: put Gilbert in the crew with the two worst people you know and he receives both bullets every time." He reportedly fantasized about the death of Gilbert's children.[67]

The text messages were criticized by President Trump, Glenn Youngkin, and other prominent Republicans officials who called for Jones to withdraw from the race. Spanberger condemned the text messages but did not call for him to withdraw from the race. Earle-Sears attempted to tie Jones to Spanberger and spent $1 million on attack ads, which criticized Spanberger's stance on Jones' text messages. Democrats largely defended Spanberger's response to the messages, while the messages themselves received significant media attention.[66][68][69][70] At James Madison University's football game, one fan shouted at Earle-Sears, "Go back to Haiti." The event received condemnation from the university, and the fan was banned from the university.[71]

Former president Barack Obama appeared in two ads for Spanberger's campaign which highlighted abortion rights and economic issues. Obama further criticized President Trump's policies.[72] Other national figures campaigned for Spanberger, including Pete Buttigieg, Andy Beshear, Ruben Gallego, Josh Shapiro, and Wes Moore.[73][74][75] Obama and Spanberger held a high-profile rally in Norfolk known as the "Virginia Votes Rally." Obama's speech focused on the economy, democracy, and Trump—most of Spanberger's advertisements continued to tie Earle-Sears to Trump.[76][77] Trump did not campaign with nor officially endorse Earle-Sears; however, he did support her over Spanberger.[78][79]

Debate

Both Spanberger and Earle-Sears initially declined to debate. In August, they agreed to meet on October 9 at Norfolk State University for one televised debate.[80]

Topics discussed during the debate included repeal of the car tax, political violence and rhetoric, the federal government shutdown, economic policies on data centers, affordability, transgender policies in schools, reproductive rights, immigration, education, and marijuana legalization.[81] Earle-Sears's debate style was described as "aggressive" as she frequently interrupted Spanberger. Spanberger sometimes "simply stood silent" and did not answer Earle-Sears's questions directed toward her. Earle-Sears made Jay Jones's messages and transgender policies a central part of her messaging.[82]

Spanberger condemned Jones's text messages but did not call for him to withdraw from the race. She declined to state if she would renew her endorsement of Jones. Earle-Sears pressured Spanberger to call for Jones to withdraw from the race.[83] Both candidates attacked each other on political violence and rhetoric. On education, Earle-Sears called for policies that would ban transgender students from bathrooms and sports which do not conform to their birth sex; Spanberger called for local control over transgender policies in schools.[84] Both Earle-Sears and Spanberger called for bipartisan support to end the shutdown.[85]

Earle-Sears, who was not endorsed by Trump, stated, "I will take all endorsements, including the president." According to CNN, Spanberger "went on offense" when she said Earle-Sears previously opposed same-sex marriage; Earle-Sears responded by saying, "That's not discrimination."[86]

Analysis

Political analyst David Richards said Spanberger won the debate: "Earle-Sears’ attempts to drag Spanberger into the Jay Jones scandal were unsuccessful. Overall, I’d give Spanberger a small edge because she seemed calmer and more professional." On their separate performances, Richards stated, "Spanberger held her own and came off as much more polished and capable, if not a little cold. Earle-Sears often came across as slightly unhinged."[84]

When asked in an October interview about her debate response where she stated, "That's not discrimination", Earle-Sears stated, "I was thinking that I was saying, 'I'm not discriminating.'"[87]

More information No., Date ...
2025 Virginia gubernatorial debate
No. Date Host Moderators Link Republican Democratic
Key:
 P  Participant   A  Absent   N  Not invited   I  Invited  W  Withdrawn
Earle-Sears Spanberger
1 October 9, 2025 WAVY-TV
Norfolk State University
Deanna Albrittin
Tom Schaad
[88] P P
Close

Predictions

More information Source, Ranking ...
Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[89] Likely D (flip) September 11, 2025
Inside Elections[90] Lean D (flip) August 28, 2025
Sabato's Crystal Ball[91] Likely D (flip) September 4, 2025
Race to the WH[92] Lean D (flip) November 4, 2025
State Navigate[93] Solid D (flip) August 22, 2025
Close

Endorsements

Abigail Spanberger (D)
Executive branch officials
U.S. Senators
U.S. representatives
Statewide officials
State legislators
Individuals
Labor unions
Organizations

Polling

Aggregate polls

More information Source of poll aggregation, Dates administered ...
Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Abigail
Spanberger (D)
Winsome
Earle-Sears (R)
Other/Undecided
[e]
Margin
270toWin[141] October 27 – November 3, 2025 November 3, 2025 53.3% 43.1% 3.6% Spanberger +10.2%
Decision Desk HQ[142] through November 3, 2025 November 3, 2025 52.3% 43.1% 4.6% Spanberger +9.2%
FiftyPlusOne[143] through November 3, 2025 November 3, 2025 53.1% 42.4% 4.5% Spanberger +10.7%
Race to the WH[144] through November 3, 2025 November 4, 2025 52.3% 42.8% 4.9% Spanberger +9.5%
RealClearPolitics[145] October 16 – November 3, 2025 November 3, 2025 52.9% 42.7% 4.4% Spanberger +10.2%
VoteHub[146] through November 3, 2025 November 3, 2025 52.1% 42.9% 5.0% Spanberger +9.2%
Average 52.7% 42.8% 4.5% Spanberger +9.9%
Close
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[c]
Margin
of error
Winsome
Earle-Sears (R)
Abigail
Spanberger (D)
Other Undecided
Quantus Insights (R)[147] November 3, 2025 1,201 (LV) ± 2.7% 44% 53% 1% 2%
InsiderAdvantage (R)[148] November 2–3, 2025 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 40% 50% 5%[f] 5%
Research Co.[149] November 2–3, 2025 423 (LV) ± 4.6% 46% 54%
450 (LV) 43% 51% 6%
The Trafalgar Group (R)[150] November 1–2, 2025 1,057 (LV) ± 2.9% 43% 50% 1%[g] 6%
Emerson College[151][B] October 30–31, 2025 880 (LV) ± 3.2% 44% 55% 0% 1%
Echelon Insights[152] October 28–31, 2025 606 (LV) ± 4.7% 43% 55% 2%
AtlasIntel[153] October 25–30, 2025 1,325 (LV) ± 3.0% 45% 54% 0%[h] 1%
SoCal Strategies (R)[154][C] October 28–29, 2025 800 (LV) 43% 53% 4%
State Navigate[155] October 26–28, 2025 614 (LV) ± 4.0% 41% 54% 5%
InsiderAdvantage (R)/
The Trafalgar Group (R)[156]
October 27–28, 2025 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 46% 4%[i] 8%
Roanoke College[157] October 22–27, 2025 1,041 (LV) ± 4.1% 41% 51% 3%[j] 5%
YouGov[158] October 17–28, 2025 1,179 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 57% 2%
41% 55% 0% 4%
A2 Insights[159] October 24–26, 2025 776 (LV) 46% 54% 1%
Christopher Newport University[160] October 21–23, 2025 803 (LV) ± 4.1% 43% 50% 6%
Suffolk University[161] October 19–21, 2025 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 43% 52% 1%[k] 4%
Quantus Insights (R)[162] October 19–20, 2025 1,302 (RV) ± 2.8% 46% 51% 1% 2%
State Navigate[163] October 17–20, 2025 694 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 55% 3%
The Washington Post/Schar School[164] October 16–20, 2025 927 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 54% 2%[l] 2%
927 (RV) 40% 53% 5%[m] 2%
Kaplan Strategies (R)[165] October 16–18, 2025 556 (LV) ± 4.2% 41% 51% 7%
co/efficient (R)[166] October 15–17, 2025 937 (LV) ± 3.2% 44% 49% 1%[g] 6%
Clarity Campaign Labs (D)[167][D] October 14–17, 2025 958 (RV) ± 3.2% 43% 53% 4%
The Trafalgar Group (R)/
InsiderAdvantage (R)[168]
October 13–15, 2025 1,039 (LV) ± 2.9% 45% 47% 1%[g] 6%
Virginia Commonwealth University[169] October 6–14, 2025 842 (A) ± 4.0% 42% 49% 9%
The Trafalgar Group (R)[170] October 8–10, 2025 1,034 (LV) ± 2.9% 45% 48% 2%[n] 6%
Public Policy Polling (D)[171][E] October 7–8, 2025 558 (RV) 43% 52% 5%
Cygnal (R)[172] October 6–7, 2025 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 49% 6%
Christopher Newport University[173] September 29 – October 1, 2025 805 (RV) ± 3.9% 42% 52% 6%
The Trafalgar Group (R)[174] September 29 – October 1, 2025 1,034 (LV) ± 2.9% 42% 47% 2%[n] 9%
Emerson College[175][B] September 28–29, 2025 725 (LV) ± 3.6% 42% 52% 5%
The Washington Post/Schar School[176] September 25–29, 2025 1,002 (LV) ± 3.4% 43% 55% 1%[o] 2%
1,002 (RV) 40% 53% 4%[p] 3%
A2 Insights[177] September 16–28, 2025 771 (LV) 45% 48% 1%[q] 6%
co/efficient (R)[178] September 22–23, 2025 1,024 (LV) ± 3.1% 43% 49% 1%[g] 7%
OnMessage Inc. (R)[179] September 15–18, 2025 800 (V) ± 3.5% 45% 50% 5%
Christopher Newport University[180] September 8–14, 2025 808 (RV) ± 3.9% 40% 52% 8%
Cygnal (R)[172] September 7, 2025 – (V) 43% 50% 7%
Pulse Decision Science (R)[181][F] September 3–5, 2025 512 (LV) ± 4.4% 43% 48% 1%[g] 8%
SoCal Strategies (R)[182][G] August 31 – September 1, 2025 700 (LV) 41% 53% 6%
Virginia Commonwealth University[183] August 18–28, 2025 764 (RV) ± 4.1% 40% 49% 2%[r] 11%
co/efficient (R)[184] August 23–26, 2025 1,025 (LV) ± 3.1% 43% 48% 3%[s] 7%
Roanoke College[185] August 11–15, 2025 702 (LV) ± 4.3% 39% 46% 1%[t] 14%
Wick Insights[186] July 9–11, 2025 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 40% 50% 2%[n] 8%
American Directions Research Group/AARP[187] June 25–July 8, 2025 1,001 (LV) ± 3.1% 34% 49% 8%[u] 9%
Virginia Commonwealth University[188] June 19–July 3, 2025 806 (A) ± 4.7% 37% 49% 2%[r] 12%
co/efficient (R)[189][H] June 8–10, 2025 1,127 (LV) ± 3.1% 43% 46% 2%[n] 9%
Roanoke College[190] May 12–19, 2025 609 (RV) ± 5.3% 26% 43% 3%[v] 28%
Pantheon Insight/HarrisX[191][I] May 9–13, 2025 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 48% 52%
45% 48% 7%[w]
Cygnal (R)[192] February 26–28, 2025 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 40% 46% 14%
Roanoke College[193] February 17–20, 2025 690 (RV) ± 4.7% 24% 39% 4%[x] 33%
co/efficient (R)[194][J] January 18–20, 2025 867 (LV) ± 3.3% 40% 40% 5%[y] 15%
Virginia Commonwealth University[195] December 18, 2024–January 15, 2025 806 (A) ± 4.7% 34% 44% 5%[z] 17%
Christopher Newport University[196] January 6–13, 2025 806 (RV) ± 3.6% 39% 44% 6%[aa] 12%
Emerson College[197][B] January 6–8, 2025 1,000 (RV) ± 3.0% 41% 42% 4%[x] 13%
Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy[198] December 15–19, 2024 625 (RV) ± 4.0% 44% 47% 9%
Research America Inc.[199][K] September 3–9, 2024 1,000 (A) ± 3.1% 39% 39% 10%[ab] 12%
co/efficient (R)[200][H] September 7–10, 2023 834 (LV) ± 3.4% 26% 27% 47%
Close
Hypothetical polling

Winsome Earle-Sears vs. Bobby Scott

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin
of error
Winsome
Earle-Sears (R)
Bobby
Scott (D)
Undecided
Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy[198] December 15–19, 2024 625 (RV) ± 4.0% 46% 44% 10%
Close

Jason Miyares vs. Abigail Spanberger

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[c]
Margin
of error
Jason
Miyares (R)
Abigail
Spanberger (D)
Undecided
Research America Inc.[199][K] September 3–9, 2024 1,000 (A) ± 3.1% 39% 40% 12%
co/efficient (R)[200][H] September 7–10, 2023 834 (LV) ± 3.4% 22% 26% 52%
Close

Results

Election turnout by county and independent city (top) and precinct (bottom):
  20–30%
  30–40%
  40–50%
  50–60%
  60–70%
  70–80%
More information Party, Candidate ...
2025 Virginia gubernatorial election[201]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Abigail Spanberger 1,976,857 57.58% +8.94%
Republican Winsome Earle-Sears 1,449,586 42.22% −8.36%
Write-in 6,897 0.20% +0.12%
Total votes 3,433,340 100.00% N/A
Democratic gain from Republican
Close

By county and independent city

More information Locality, Winsome Earle-Sears Republican ...
Locality[202] Winsome Earle-Sears
Republican
Abigail Spanberger
Democratic
Write-in
Various
Margin Total
# % # % # % # %
Accomack 7,129 54.57% 5,925 45.35% 10 0.08% −1,204 −9.22% 13,064
Albemarle 16,480 29.48% 39,322 70.35% 93 0.17% 22,842 40.87% 55,895
Alexandria 10,424 16.59% 52,230 83.11% 190 0.30% 41,806 66.52% 62,844
Alleghany 4,011 69.14% 1,779 30.67% 11 0.19% −2,232 −38.48% 5,801
Amelia 4,521 71.08% 1,831 28.79% 8 0.13% −2,690 −42.30% 6,360
Amherst 8,811 67.13% 4,294 32.72% 20 0.15% −4,517 −34.42% 13,125
Appomattox 5,609 75.94% 1,765 23.90% 12 0.16% −3,844 −52.04% 7,386
Arlington 15,929 15.96% 83,657 83.81% 235 0.24% 67,728 67.85% 99,821
Augusta 24,612 71.98% 9,522 27.85% 60 0.18% −15,090 −44.13% 34,194
Bath 1,421 74.05% 493 25.69% 5 0.26% −928 −48.36% 1,919
Bedford 29,166 74.27% 10,048 25.59% 57 0.15% −19,118 −48.68% 39,271
Bland 1,974 81.64% 441 18.24% 3 0.12% −1,533 −63.40% 2,418
Botetourt 11,820 70.27% 4,969 29.54% 32 0.19% −6,851 −40.73% 16,821
Bristol 3,090 64.96% 1,660 34.90% 7 0.15% −1,430 −30.06% 4,757
Brunswick 2,591 43.66% 3,338 56.25% 5 0.08% 747 12.59% 5,934
Buchanan 4,434 81.91% 971 17.94% 8 0.15% −3,463 −63.98% 5,413
Buckingham 3,586 59.22% 2,456 40.56% 13 0.21% −1,130 −18.66% 6,055
Buena Vista 1,392 66.38% 696 33.19% 9 0.43% −696 −33.19% 2,097
Campbell 16,878 73.25% 6,130 26.60% 34 0.15% −10,748 −46.65% 23,042
Caroline 6,680 49.72% 6,733 50.11% 23 0.17% 53 0.39% 13,436
Carroll 8,889 78.33% 2,433 21.44% 26 0.23% −6,456 −56.89% 11,348
Charles City 1,485 42.53% 2,002 57.33% 5 0.14% 517 14.81% 3,492
Charlotte 3,159 67.07% 1,545 32.80% 6 0.13% −1,614 −34.27% 4,710
Charlottesville 2,056 10.88% 16,799 88.93% 35 0.19% 14,743 78.05% 18,890
Chesapeake 42,147 43.77% 53,971 56.06% 164 0.17% 11,824 12.28% 96,282
Chesterfield 70,021 40.97% 100,595 58.86% 294 0.17% 30,574 17.89% 170,910
Clarke 4,222 55.34% 3,389 44.42% 18 0.24% −833 −10.92% 7,629
Colonial Heights 4,092 62.12% 2,474 37.56% 21 0.32% −1,618 −24.56% 6,587
Covington 999 59.57% 678 40.43% 0 0.00% −321 −19.14% 1,677
Craig 1,806 79.25% 467 20.49% 6 0.26% −1,339 −58.75% 2,279
Culpeper 12,592 57.66% 9,214 42.19% 33 0.15% −3,378 −15.47% 21,839
Cumberland 2,609 59.03% 1,803 40.79% 8 0.18% −806 −18.24% 4,420
Danville 4,592 37.34% 7,678 62.43% 29 0.24% 3,086 25.09% 12,299
Dickenson 3,427 76.80% 1,028 23.04% 7 0.16% −2,399 −53.77% 4,462
Dinwiddie 7,028 58.19% 5,031 41.65% 19 0.16% −1,997 −16.53% 12,078
Emporia 544 32.65% 1,119 67.17% 3 0.18% 575 34.51% 1,666
Essex 2,572 52.82% 2,289 47.01% 8 0.16% −283 −5.81% 4,869
Fairfax City 2,847 27.28% 7,552 72.37% 36 0.34% 4,705 45.09% 10,435
Fairfax County 116,053 25.95% 329,977 73.78% 1,222 0.27% 213,924 47.83% 447,252
Falls Church 1,181 15.54% 6,407 84.30% 12 0.16% 5,226 68.76% 7,600
Fauquier 19,894 57.55% 14,610 42.27% 62 0.18% −5,284 −15.29% 34,566
Floyd 4,806 64.73% 2,603 35.06% 16 0.22% −2,203 −29.67% 7,425
Fluvanna 6,718 49.95% 6,712 49.91% 19 0.14% −6 −0.04% 13,449
Franklin City 1,084 36.93% 1,849 63.00% 2 0.07% 765 26.06% 2,935
Franklin County 16,317 70.37% 6,836 29.48% 36 0.16% −9,481 −40.89% 23,189
Frederick 23,130 59.32% 15,809 40.55% 51 0.13% −7,321 −18.78% 38,990
Fredericksburg 2,943 27.93% 7,561 71.76% 33 0.31% 4,618 43.83% 10,537
Galax 1,284 68.23% 597 31.72% 1 0.05% −687 −36.50% 1,882
Giles 4,983 73.48% 1,782 26.28% 16 0.24% −3,201 −47.21% 6,781
Gloucester 11,399 65.73% 5,912 34.09% 30 0.17% −5,487 −31.64% 17,341
Goochland 9,726 56.91% 7,339 42.95% 24 0.14% −2,387 −13.97% 17,089
Grayson 4,614 78.35% 1,264 21.46% 11 0.19% −3,350 −56.89% 5,889
Greene 5,458 57.39% 4,036 42.44% 16 0.17% −1,422 −14.95% 9,510
Greensville 1,427 42.76% 1,902 57.00% 8 0.24% 475 14.23% 3,337
Halifax 8,027 60.26% 5,272 39.58% 22 0.17% −2,755 −20.68% 13,321
Hampton 12,103 25.58% 35,129 74.23% 91 0.19% 23,026 48.66% 47,323
Hanover 36,278 60.10% 23,994 39.75% 95 0.16% −12,284 −20.35% 60,367
Harrisonburg 3,654 27.70% 9,512 72.12% 23 0.17% 5,858 44.42% 13,189
Henrico 45,627 30.53% 103,559 69.30% 260 0.17% 57,932 38.76% 149,446
Henry 11,150 63.71% 6,320 36.11% 30 0.17% −4,830 −27.60% 17,500
Highland 831 69.60% 362 30.32% 1 0.08% −469 −39.28% 1,194
Hopewell 2,610 39.10% 4,052 60.70% 13 0.19% 1,442 21.60% 6,675
Isle of Wight 10,931 56.95% 8,227 42.86% 37 0.19% −2,704 −14.09% 19,195
James City 19,029 44.57% 23,603 55.28% 63 0.15% 4,574 10.71% 42,695
King and Queen 1,985 60.50% 1,292 39.38% 4 0.12% −693 −21.12% 3,281
King George 6,909 59.33% 4,716 40.50% 20 0.17% −2,193 −18.83% 11,645
King William 6,033 66.56% 3,020 33.32% 11 0.12% −3,013 −33.24% 9,064
Lancaster 3,283 54.44% 2,734 45.34% 13 0.22% −549 −9.10% 6,030
Lee 5,439 84.13% 1,019 15.76% 7 0.11% −4,420 −68.37% 6,465
Lexington 686 31.66% 1,475 68.07% 6 0.28% 789 36.41% 2,167
Loudoun 59,278 35.22% 108,594 64.52% 444 0.26% 49,316 29.30% 168,316
Louisa 11,279 59.52% 7,628 40.25% 44 0.23% −3,651 −19.27% 18,951
Lunenburg 2,682 59.61% 1,806 40.14% 11 0.24% −876 −19.47% 4,499
Lynchburg 13,508 50.41% 13,231 49.38% 56 0.21% −277 −1.03% 26,795
Madison 4,259 64.01% 2,386 35.86% 9 0.14% −1,873 −28.15% 6,654
Manassas 4,036 34.42% 7,671 65.42% 18 0.15% 3,635 31.00% 11,725
Manassas Park 1,151 28.72% 2,852 71.16% 5 0.12% 1,701 42.44% 4,008
Martinsville 1,451 36.35% 2,534 63.48% 7 0.18% 1,083 27.13% 3,992
Mathews 3,242 67.51% 1,555 32.38% 5 0.10% −1,687 −35.13% 4,802
Mecklenburg 7,151 60.50% 4,657 39.40% 11 0.09% −2,494 −21.10% 11,819
Middlesex 3,473 61.44% 2,174 38.46% 6 0.11% −1,299 −22.98% 5,653
Montgomery 15,228 41.46% 21,428 58.34% 76 0.21% 6,200 16.88% 36,732
Nelson 3,828 49.55% 3,880 50.23% 17 0.22% 52 0.67% 7,725
New Kent 8,804 63.28% 5,087 36.56% 22 0.16% −3,717 −26.72% 13,913
Newport News 17,461 30.91% 38,936 68.93% 92 0.16% 21,475 38.02% 56,489
Norfolk 15,509 24.15% 48,599 75.68% 111 0.17% 33,090 51.53% 64,219
Northampton 2,469 44.59% 3,060 55.26% 8 0.14% 591 10.67% 5,537
Northumberland 4,132 60.47% 2,685 39.29% 16 0.23% −1,447 −21.18% 6,833
Norton 721 68.34% 332 31.47% 2 0.19% −389 −36.87% 1,055
Nottoway 3,122 57.91% 2,258 41.88% 11 0.20% −864 −16.03% 5,391
Orange 9,938 57.34% 7,361 42.47% 33 0.19% −2,577 −14.87% 17,332
Page 6,940 74.39% 2,365 25.35% 24 0.26% −4,575 −49.04% 9,329
Patrick 5,119 77.42% 1,488 22.50% 5 0.08% −3,631 −54.92% 6,612
Petersburg 1,124 11.29% 8,811 88.46% 25 0.25% 7,687 77.18% 9,960
Pittsylvania 17,439 70.46% 7,272 29.38% 38 0.15% −10,167 −41.08% 24,749
Poquoson 4,384 70.01% 1,862 29.73% 16 0.26% −2,522 −40.27% 6,262
Portsmouth 8,351 26.55% 23,040 73.25% 62 0.20% 14,689 46.70% 31,453
Powhatan 11,862 69.57% 5,168 30.31% 21 0.12% −6,694 −39.26% 17,051
Prince Edward 3,668 49.20% 3,767 50.53% 20 0.27% 99 1.33% 7,455
Prince George 7,986 58.27% 5,707 41.64% 13 0.09% −2,279 −16.63% 13,706
Prince William 54,309 32.74% 111,198 67.03% 381 0.23% 56,889 34.29% 165,888
Pulaski 8,607 68.55% 3,927 31.28% 22 0.18% −4,680 −37.27% 12,556
Radford 2,050 43.68% 2,632 56.08% 11 0.23% 582 12.40% 4,693
Rappahannock 2,231 55.10% 1,812 44.75% 6 0.15% −419 −10.35% 4,049
Richmond City 11,883 13.04% 79,019 86.73% 212 0.23% 67,136 73.68% 91,114
Richmond County 1,997 63.88% 1,124 35.96% 5 0.16% −873 −27.93% 3,126
Roanoke City 10,153 32.82% 20,700 66.91% 83 0.27% 10,547 34.09% 30,936
Roanoke County 24,728 57.66% 18,062 42.12% 97 0.23% −6,666 −15.54% 42,887
Rockbridge 6,599 64.93% 3,557 35.00% 7 0.07% −3,042 −29.93% 10,163
Rockingham 24,498 67.68% 11,622 32.11% 76 0.21% −12,876 −35.57% 36,196
Russell 7,268 81.13% 1,673 18.68% 17 0.19% −5,595 −62.46% 8,958
Salem 5,282 55.81% 4,150 43.85% 32 0.34% −1,132 −11.96% 9,464
Scott 6,103 83.00% 1,235 16.80% 15 0.20% −4,868 −66.20% 7,353
Shenandoah 12,488 68.53% 5,698 31.27% 37 0.20% −6,790 −37.26% 18,223
Smyth 7,712 76.90% 2,298 22.92% 18 0.18% −5,414 −53.99% 10,028
Southampton 4,492 60.34% 2,945 39.56% 8 0.11% −1,547 −20.78% 7,445
Spotsylvania 29,015 48.47% 30,748 51.36% 104 0.17% 1,733 2.89% 59,867
Stafford 27,774 43.94% 35,327 55.88% 115 0.18% 7,553 11.95% 63,216
Staunton 4,236 39.10% 6,580 60.73% 18 0.17% 2,344 21.64% 10,834
Suffolk 15,935 38.20% 25,696 61.60% 80 0.19% 9,761 23.40% 41,711
Surry 1,707 47.63% 1,873 52.26% 4 0.11% 166 4.63% 3,584
Sussex 1,802 46.91% 2,035 52.98% 4 0.10% 233 6.07% 3,841
Tazewell 10,407 82.10% 2,248 17.73% 21 0.17% −8,159 −64.37% 12,676
Virginia Beach 75,013 44.22% 94,339 55.62% 269 0.16% 19,326 11.39% 169,621
Warren 10,433 64.29% 5,757 35.47% 39 0.24% −4,676 −28.81% 16,229
Washington 15,614 74.21% 5,382 25.58% 43 0.20% −10,232 −48.63% 21,039
Waynesboro 4,037 47.46% 4,459 52.42% 11 0.13% 422 4.96% 8,507
Westmoreland 4,396 54.02% 3,733 45.88% 8 0.10% −663 −8.15% 8,137
Williamsburg 1,647 24.51% 5,063 75.35% 9 0.13% 3,416 50.84% 6,719
Winchester 3,485 39.52% 5,318 60.30% 16 0.18% 1,833 20.78% 8,819
Wise 8,744 79.15% 2,281 20.65% 22 0.20% −6,463 −58.50% 11,047
Wythe 8,426 76.29% 2,594 23.49% 24 0.22% −5,832 −52.81% 11,044
York 15,684 49.79% 15,769 50.06% 47 0.15% 85 0.27% 31,500
Totals1,449,58642.22%1,976,85757.58%6,8970.20%527,27115.36%3,433,340
Close

Counties and independent cities that flipped from Republican to Democratic

By congressional district

Spanberger won eight of 11 congressional districts, including two held by Republicans.[203]

More information District, Earle-Sears ...
District Earle-Sears Spanberger Representative
1st 48.6% 51.2% Rob Wittman
2nd 46.1% 53.7% Jen Kiggans
3rd 27.9% 71.9% Bobby Scott
4th 29.2% 70.6% Jennifer McClellan
5th 53.5% 46.3% John McGuire
6th 58.2% 41.6% Ben Cline
7th 42.2% 57.6% Eugene Vindman
8th 19.6% 80.1% Don Beyer
9th 68.1% 31.7% Morgan Griffith
10th 39.6% 60.1% Suhas Subramanyam
11th 26.2% 73.5% James Walkinshaw
Close

Aftermath and analysis

Spanberger set a record for most votes received by a gubernatorial candidate in Virginia's history. Spanberger's sizable victory was attributed to concerns over affordability, Earle-Sears' tendency to change staff and failure to find a convincing message, Spanberger's fundraising advantage, a significant decline in turnout in heavily Republican Southwest Virginia, and outrage in Northern Virginia over the mass layoffs of federal workers as part of President Donald Trump's efforts to downsize the federal government.[204] Additionally, many furloughed federal workers were energized by the ongoing federal government shutdown. Discontentment with the U.S. economy under Trump, which many Virginians blamed on his tariff policies, also played a factor in motivating Spanberger voters.[205] The layoffs boosted Spanberger in Northern Virginia which contributed to her large victory margin.[206]

Northern Virginia backed 88% of her statewide margin, where every locality in the region saw her margin increase significantly from McAuliffe's performance in 2021. She could've won statewide without Northern Virginia by three points.[207]

Spanberger did well with college-educated voters, winning voters with college degrees by 27 points (63%-36%). Many college campuses shifted leftward by 18 points on average due to young voters. Virginia Tech shifted 34 points to the left, which was the largest shift of all the college campuses. Spanberger’s strongest independent city was Charlottesville, where the University of Virginia is — her alma mater. The evangelical Liberty University in Lynchburg shifted to the left by six points.[208] College-educated voters made up more of the electorate compared to 2021. Spanberger narrowly won non-college-educated voters (50%-49%) despite Youngkin's 19-point margin (59%-40%) with non-college-educated voters from 2021.[209]

This is the first time since 1985 that a Democrat carried Spotsylvania County, a notable Republican stronghold, as well as Waynesboro City. Stafford County also flipped for the first time since 1985, though Harris won Stafford in 2024. Nelson County and Caroline County also voted Democratic for the first time since 2013. James City County voted Democratic for the first time since 2005, although it voted Democratic in 2020 and 2024.[210] Spanberger's closest victory was in York County, which voted Democratic for the first time since 1965.[211] Spanberger improved with Latino voters from 2024.[212]

Exit poll

More information Demographic subgroup, Spanberger ...
2025 Virginia gubernatorial election voter demographics (CNN)[213]
Demographic subgroup Spanberger Earle-Sears % of
total vote
Ideology
Liberals 96 4 33
Moderates 69 31 33
Conservatives 10 90 35
Party
Democrats 99 1 36
Republicans 7 93 31
Independents 59 40 33
Donald Trump job approval
Approve 6 94 39
Disapprove 92 7 59
Most important issue facing Virginia
Economy 63 36 48
Health care 81 18 21
Education 55 45 11
Immigration 11 89 11
2024 presidential vote
Kamala Harris 99 1 51
Donald Trump 7 93 42
Another candidate 61 36 2
Did not vote 61 39 3
Gender
Men 48 51 47
Women 65 35 53
Income
$200,000 or more 64 36 14
$100,000-$199,999 51 48 28
$50,000-$99,999 58 42 31
Less than $50,000 63 37 26
Race/ethnicity
White 47 53 71
Asian 80 20 4
Latino 67 33 5
Black 93 7 16
White born-again or evangelical Christian?
Yes 20 80 28
No 71 29 72
Race by gender
White men 38 61 34
White women 54 46 36
Black men 89 11 7
Black women 96 3 9
Latino men 53 47 2
Latina women 78 22 2
All other voters 73 27 9
Age
18–29 years old 70 29 13
30–44 years old 62 38 20
45-64 years old 55 45 35
65 and older 51 49 32
Area type
Urban 66 34 19
Suburban 59 41 57
Rural 46 54 24
Education
College graduate 63 36 52
No college degree 50 49 48
Education by race
White college graduates 57 43 38
Non-white college graduates 80 19 14
Whites without college 34 66 33
Non-whites without college 85 15 15
Education by gender and race
White women with college degrees 65 35 20
White women without college degrees 39 60 16
White men with college degrees 48 52 18
White men without college degrees 29 71 17
Voters of color 83 17 30
Educational attainment
Advanced degree 68 32 23
Bachelor's degree 60 40 29
Associate's degree 53 47 10
Some college 55 45 17
Never attended college 46 54 21
Close

See also

Notes

  1. From May 21 to September 10, 2025, Virginia's 11th congressional district was vacant after the death of Democratic Representative Gerry Connolly. This temporarily created a split 5-5 U.S. House delegation in the state. Democrats' 6-5 majority was restored when Democrat James Walkinshaw won the September 9 special election.
  2. Commonly referred to as DOGE.
  3. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  4. Held office as a Republican
  5. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  6. Donna Charles with 5%
  7. Donna Charles with 1%
  8. "Would not vote" with 0%
  9. Donna Charles with 4%
  10. "Refused" with 2%; "Some other candidate" with 1%
  11. "Refused" with 1%; Donna Charles with 0%
  12. "Neither" and "Would not vote" with 1%
  13. "Neither" with 3%; "Would not vote" with 2%
  14. Donna Charles with 2%
  15. "None of these" with 1%
  16. "Neither" and "Would not vote" with 2%
  17. "Other" with 1%
  18. "Wouldn't vote" with 1%; "Someone else" with 1%
  19. Donna Charles with 3%
  20. "Some other candidate" with 1%
  21. Donna Charles with 8%
  22. "Some other candidate" with 3%
  23. Denver Riggleman with 7%
  24. "Someone else" with 4%
  25. "Someone else" with 5%
  26. "Wouldn't vote" with 4%; "Someone else" with 1%
  27. "Someone else" with 2%. "Don't know/Refused" with 4%
  28. "None / Would not vote" with 5%; "Other candidate" with 4%; "Refused" with 1%

Partisan clients

  1. Poll sponsored by Stoney's campaign
  2. Poll sponsored by The Hill
  3. Poll sponsored by Red Eagle Politics, a conservative content creator
  4. Poll commissioned by the Democratic Governors Association, which supports Spanberger
  5. Poll sponsored by John Reid's campaign for LT Gov
  6. Poll sponsored by the Virginia Project
  7. Poll sponsored by Founders Insight
  8. Poll sponsored by Virginia FREE
  9. Poll sponsored by the Northern Virginia Republican Business Forum
  10. Poll sponsored by the University of Mary Washington

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI