2026 United States Senate election in Michigan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan will be held on November 3, 2026, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the state of Michigan. Primary elections will be held on August 4, 2026.[1] Democratic incumbent Gary Peters is not seeking a third term.[2] The presumptive Republican nominee is former congressman Mike Rogers.

Quick facts Nominee, Party ...
2026 United States Senate election in Michigan

 2020
November 3, 2026
2032 
 
Nominee TBD Mike Rogers
(presumptive)
Party Democratic Republican

Incumbent U.S. senator

Gary Peters
Democratic



Close

This seat is one of only two Democratic-held Senate seats up for election in a state won by Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. Republicans have not won a Senate election in Michigan since 1994.[3]

Background

Michigan is considered to be a swing state. Most recently in the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, the state backed Joe Biden by 2.8% and Donald Trump by 1.4%, respectively.[4] Gary Peters was first elected with 54.6% of the vote in 2014 and re-elected with 49.9% in 2020.[5][6] He announced in January 2025 that he was not seeking reelection for a third term.[7]

Both parties have seen success in the state in recent years, although Democrats have had more success outside of presidential races. Democrats control both of Michigan's U.S. Senate seats, all statewide executive offices, and the state senate. Republicans control the Michigan House of Representatives and hold a majority in Michigan's U.S. House delegation.[8] Republicans have not won a Michigan U.S. Senate race since 1994 and have not won this seat since 1972.[9] Additionally, Republicans have not won a non-presidential statewide race in Michigan since 2014.

As one of only two seats up held by a Democrat in a state that voted for Trump in 2024, Michigan is considered a key Senate battleground in 2026.[10][11]

Democratic primary

Campaign

Mallory McMorrow, who had been first elected to the Michigan Senate in 2018, announced her bid to succeed Gary Peters in the US Senate race on April 2, 2025, becoming the first high-profile Democrat to enter the race.[12] McMorrow's announcement was accompanied by a launch video that included footage from a 2022 speech responding to political attacks from her GOP colleagues over her support for transgender individuals.[13][14] Abdul El-Sayed, a former director of Wayne County's Department of Health, Human and Veteran Services, entered the race on April 19, 2025.[15] Three days later, Haley Stevens, who has represented Michigan's 11th congressional district since 2018, announced her candidacy for the seat.[16] By March 2026, McMorrow's campaign had reached 30,000 signatures, enough to qualify her for the ballot, having done so without the use of paid petition circulators, instead relying entirely on volunteers to reach this threshold.[17] In April 2026, the Stevens and El-Sayed campaign also collected a sufficient number of signatures to qualify for the ballot.[18][19] That same month, all three candidates gave speeches at the Democratic Party's Spring Endorsement Convention in Detroit.[20]

Stevens, McMorrow, and El-Sayed each represented different ideological wings and strategies within the party. Stevens, who has received private backing from Senate Democratic leadership, is considered to be more moderate, while El-Sayed is considered to be more progressive. During her time in the campaign, McMorrow emphasized her desire for new leadership within the Democratic Party.[21][22] Specifically, McMorrow had pledged not to support Chuck Schumer as party leader if elected to the US Senate,[23] a position criticized by El-Sayed, who believed that it was myopic to oppose Schumer without a clear replacement.[15] Stevens has also focused on issues related to the manufacturing industry in Michigan, particularly her work in bailing out the Big Three automobile manufactures during her time in the Obama administration, whereas McMorrow and El-Sayed have advocated for Michigan to shift towards other sectors by promoting apprenticeships in beekeeping, winemaking, and leather-making.[24] In July 2026, McMorrow dropped out of the race after having fallen in polling.[25][26] Independent polls since McMorrow's departure have shown Stevens and El-Sayed statistically tied.[26][27] Stevens has since earned the endorsement of Peters, as well as other Michigan elected officials.[28] The Stevens campaign has seen over $50 million in donations from outside groups compared to under $1 million for the El-Sayed campaign.[29]

Policy differences between the two candidates include immigration, foreign policy, and healthcare.[30] Israel has become a focal point for the race. El-Sayed, who is considered pro-Palestinian, has been the most critical of Israel of the candidates, expressing support for ending all unconditional military aid to the country. Stevens, meanwhile, has voted to supply Israel's military with additional weapons and has received considerable support and funding from the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC. She publicly supports a two-state solution and advocates for both sides being able to peacefully coexist with each other,[31] and her relationship Benjamin Netanyahu is negative, accusing him of intentionally putting Jewish people in danger around the world.[32][30][33] On other policies, El-Sayed supports Medicare for All and the abolition of ICE, while Stevens has taken a more moderate version of each stance, instead called for expanding Medicare access and reforming ICE.[34] El-Sayed told Time that he is not a socialist and instead believes that capitalism is "a great way to allocate resources, as long as everybody has access to it."[35] El-Sayed has faced criticism for claiming that he never supported the Defund the Police movement, despite advocating for the position on Detroit Public Radio and on social media. He later denied that he ever supported the movement, after he deleted more than a dozen posts which had confirmed his support for it.[36][37]

The primary campaign has seen debate arise regarding the electability of either candidate. Supporters of El-Sayed argue that he is an outsider who will be an unapologetic progressive voice in the Senate.[38] Figures on the progressive left and the Democratic Socialist movement, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, who argue that El-Sayed's policy positions will energize voters in the primary and the general election.[39][40] His supporters have also drawn attention to an ad buy sponsored by AIPAC featuring former President Barack Obama praising Stevens, which they believe could mislead voters into thinking that Obama endorsed Stevens in this race.[29]

Meanwhile, Stevens' supporters argue that El-Sayed's appeal to the progressive base will not work to win the general election and will alienate voters in a state Trump won twice.[41] Stevens' supporters have drawn attention to El-Sayed's embrace of figures in the Democratic Socialist movement, like Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, as a strategy that has not been tested which could jeopardize the Democratic Party's chances of holding onto the seat and winning a majority in the Senate.[42][38][43] El-Sayed's choice to campaign with Hasan Piker, a polarizing internet figure accused of antisemitism,[44] as well as racism and misogyny,[45] drew backlash from such as McMorrow, Stevens, and presumptive Republican nominee Mike Rogers.[46][47] Other Democrats and party leaders argue that El-Sayed's embrace of Piker on the campaign will inhibit his ability to win the general election.[48][49] Stevens had been successful in flipping a Republican-held seat in 2018 and held onto her seat during all subsequent election cycles, including in 2020 when Biden narrowly carried her district, which her supporters believe demonstrates her electability. They also argue that similarly moderate female candidates in Michigan, including Jennifer Granholm, Elissa Slotkin, and Gretchen Whitmer,[50][43] have previously run very competitive races, outperforming expectations, as evidence contributing to the case that a moderate woman like Stevens would be the more electable candidate.[43]

Candidates

Declared

Not on ballot

  • Rachel Howard, research health specialist[53][54]

Withdrawn

Declined

Endorsements

Abdul El-Sayed
Executive branch officials
U.S. senators
U.S. representatives
Statewide officials
State legislators
Local officials
Individuals
Labor unions
Organizations
Political parties
Newspapers
Haley Stevens
Executive branch officials
U.S. senators
U.S. representatives
Statewide officials
State legislators
Local officials
Individuals
Party officials
Party chapters
Labor unions
Organizations
Newspapers
Mallory McMorrow (withdrawn, will remain on ballot)
U.S. senators
Statewide officials
State legislators
Local officials
Party chapters
Labor unions
Organizations
Newspapers
Declined to endorse
Executive branch officials
U.S. senators
Statewide officials
State legislators

Debates and forums

More information No., Date ...
2026 Michigan Democratic Senate primary debates and forums
No. Date Host Moderator Link Democratic Democratic Democratic
Key:
 P  Participant  W  Withdrawn 
El-Sayed McMorrow Stevens
1[179] February 11, 2026 United Auto Workers Mark DePaoli
Brandon Mancilla
LaShawn English
YouTube P P P
2[180] April 24, 2026 Council of Baptist Pastors of Detroit and Vicinity Jackie Nelson
James Williams
YouTube P P P
3[181] May 28, 2026 Mackinac Policy Conference Nolan Finley
Stephen Henderson
YouTube P P P
4[182] July 7, 2026 WOOD-TV Rick Albin YouTube P W P
Close

Fundraising

Italics indicate a withdrawn candidate.

More information Campaign finance reports as of June 30, 2026, Candidate ...
Campaign finance reports as of June 30, 2026
Candidate Raised Spent Cash on hand
Abdul El-Sayed (D) $12,222,406 $9,492,277 $2,730,129
Rachel Howard (D) $10,937[g] $6,171 $4,766
Mallory McMorrow (D) $11,313,789 $9,151,203 $2,162,586
Haley Stevens (D) $10,963,774[h] $7,544,971 $3,418,801
Source: Federal Election Commission[183]
Close

Polling

Aggregate polls

More information Source of poll aggregation, Dates administered ...
Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Abdul
El-Sayed
Mallory
McMorrow
Haley
Stevens
Undecided[i] Margin
270toWin[184] June 9 – July 11, 2026 July 20, 2026 37.4% 7.7% 35.8% 19.1% El-Sayed +1.6%
Decision Desk HQ[185] through July 15, 2026 July 20, 2026 47.1% 40.5% 12.4% El-Sayed +6.6%
Race to the WH[186] through July 15, 2026 July 20, 2026 43.4% 8.5% 40.6% 7.5% El-Sayed +2.8%
RealClearPolitics[187] July 6–11, 2026 July 15, 2026 41.0% 45.0% 14.0% Stevens +4.0%
FiftyPlusOne[188] through July 15, 2026 July 21, 2026 48.3% 6.7% 41.4% 3.6% El-Sayed +6.9%
Average 43.4% 7.6% 40.7% 8.3% El-Sayed +2.7%
Close
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Abdul
El-Sayed
Mallory
McMorrow
Haley
Stevens
Other Undecided
Tulchin Research (D)[189][A] July 13–15, 2026 500 (LV) 56% 40% 4%
Data for Progress (D)[190][B] July 10–14, 2026 614 (LV) ± 4.0% 54% 41% 5%
Glengariff Group[191][C] July 8–11, 2026 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 41% 48% 11%
Tavern Research (D)[192] July 6–8, 2026 2,211 (LV) ± 2.5% 41% 5% 38% 16%
41% 42% 18%
July 5, 2026 McMorrow suspends her campaign
Quantus Insights (R)[193] June 29–30, 2026 947 (LV) ± 3.3% 41% 8% 36% 16%
Wedgewood Polls[194] June 25–28, 2026 353 (LV) ± 5.7% 46% 9% 39% 6%
Tulchin Research (D)[195][A] June 24–28, 2026 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 46% 17% 27% 9%
Peak Insights (R)[196] June 20–24, 2026 400 (LV) ± 6.0% 39% 18% 28% 15%
Susquehanna Polling & Research[197] June 9–14, 2026 205 (LV) ± 6.9% 22% 9% 20% 49%
Mitchell Research & Communications[198][D] June 11–13, 2026 409 (LV) ± 4.9% 42% 6% 33% 19%
Lake Research Partners (D)[199][E] May 26–28, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 34% 19% 31% 15%
Tulchin Research (D)[200][201][A] May 19–25, 2026 500 (LV) 41% 18% 23% 18%
TIPP Insights (R)[202][F] May 20–23, 2026 619 (LV) 31% 13% 35% 1%[k] 19%
Mitchell Research[203] May 1–7, 2026 405 (LV) ± 4.9% 27% 17% 18% 38%
Glengariff Group[204][G] April 17–19, 2026 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 23% 16% 25% 0% 36%
23%[l] 18% 25% 34%
Emerson College[205] April 11–13, 2026 519 (LV) ± 4.3% 24% 24% 13% 3%[m] 36%
Data for Progress (D)[206][H] April 2–8, 2026 515 (LV) ± 4.0% 22% 22% 23% 33%
Global Strategy Group (D)[207][I] March 19−22, 2026 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 25% 30% 23% 21%
Upswing Research (D)[208][J] February 26 – March 2, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 23% 25% 27% 25%
Impact Research (D)[209][K] February 10–16, 2026 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 26% 25% 28% 21%
Emerson College[210] January 24–25, 2026 491 (LV) ± 4.4% 16% 22% 16% 7%[n] 38%
Mitchell Research & Communications[211] November 18–21, 2025 261 (LV) ± 6.1% 16% 24% 27% 33%
Rosetta Stone Communications (R)[212] October 23–25, 2025 287 (LV) ± 5.8% 20% 25% 26% 29%
NRSC (R)[213] July 4–7, 2025 582 (LV) ± 3.0% 22% 11% 24% 1%[o] 42%
Global Strategy Group (D)[214][I] May 28 − June 2, 2025 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 15% 20% 24% 4%[p] 37%
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 22% 14% 34% 30%
24%[l] 12% 34% 30%
Close
Hypothetical polling
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Pete
Buttigieg
Haley
Stevens
Gretchen
Whitmer
Other Undecided
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 303 (LV) ± 5.6% 2% 59% 22%[q] 17%
Target Insyght[217] February 3–8, 2025 344 (V) ± 5.7% 27% 4% 43% 26%
Close

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Democratic primary results
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Abdul El-Sayed
Democratic Mallory McMorrow (withdrawn)
Democratic Haley Stevens
Total votes 100.00
Close

Republican primary

Candidates

Presumptive nominee

Disqualified

Not on ballot

Withdrawn

Declined

Endorsements

Mike Rogers
Executive branch officials
U.S. senators
U.S. representatives
State legislators
Organizations

Fundraising

Italics indicate a withdrawn or disqualified candidate.

More information Campaign finance reports as of June 30, 2026, Candidate ...
Campaign finance reports as of June 30, 2026
Candidate Raised Spent Cash on hand
Mike Rogers (R) $10,582,463 $5,114,340 $5,723,827
Genevieve Scott (R) $83,079[s] $80,540 $2,538
Bernadette Smith (R) $77,239 $73,172 $4,067
Source: Federal Election Commission[183]
Close

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Mike
Rogers
Bernadette
Smith
Other Undecided
May 28, 2026 Board of Elections announces Smith did not file enough valid signatures to appear on the ballot
Emerson College[205] April 11–13, 2026 452 (LV) ± 4.6% 55% 1% 6%[t] 38%
Close
Hypothetical polling
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Tudor
Dixon
Bill
Huizenga
Mike
Rogers
Other Undecided
Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (R)[237][238][L] June 17–19, 2025 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 20% 48% 32%
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 17% 61% 22%
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 281 (LV) ± 5.8% 28% 9% 25% 14%[u] 24%
Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (R)[239] February 17–19, 2025 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 40% 36% 24%
Close

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Republican primary results
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Mike Rogers
Total votes 100.00
Close

General election

Predictions

More information Source, Ranking ...
Source Ranking As of
Inside Elections[240] Tossup April 23, 2026
Race To The WH[241] Tilt D May 22, 2026
RealClearPolitics[242] Tossup May 19, 2026
Sabato's Crystal Ball[243] Tossup March 4, 2026
The Cook Political Report[244] Tossup April 13, 2026
The Economist[245][v] Lean D May 22, 2026
Decision Desk HQ[246] Lean D July 14, 2026
Close

Polling

Abdul El-Sayed vs. Mike Rogers

Aggregate polls

More information Source of poll aggregation, Dates administered ...
Source of poll aggregation Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Abdul
El-Sayed (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other/
Undecided[w]
Margin
270toWin[184] June 1 – July 1, 2026 July 13, 2026 45.0% 42.5% 12.5% El-Sayed +2.5%
Race to the WH[186] through June 30, 2026 July 13, 2026 45.4% 43.3% 11.3% El-Sayed +2.1%
RealClearPolitics[187] April 28 – June 30, 2026 July 2, 2026 43.8% 43.3% 12.9% El-Sayed +0.5%
Average 44.7% 43.0% 12.2% El-Sayed +1.7%
Close
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Abdul
El-Sayed (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other Undecided
Quantus Insights (R)[193] June 29–30, 2026 947 (LV) ± 3.3% 45% 44% 3% 8%
Data for Progress (D)[247][M] June 15–22, 2026 709 (LV) ± 4.0% 47% 46% 7%
Zenith Research (D)[248][N] June 11–14, 2026 602 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 42% 13%
Mitchell Research & Communications[249][D] June 11–13, 2026 827 (LV) ± 3.4% 47% 42% 11%
Tulchin Research (D)[250][A] June 2–4, 2026 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 46% 41% 13%
TIPP Insights (R)[202][F] May 20–23, 2026 1,456 (RV) ± 2.7% 40% 40% 7%[x] 13%
1,163 (LV) ± 3.0% 43% 42% 6%[y] 9%
Mitchell Research[251][D] May 1–7, 2026 607 (LV) ± 6.0% 41% 42% 17%
Glengariff Group[252][G] April 28 – May 1, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 40% 45% 15%
42%[l] 45% 13%
Emerson College[210] January 24–25, 2026 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 43% 43% 14%
Glengariff Group[253][C] January 2–6, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 47%[l] 43% 10%
42% 48% 10%
Mitchell Research & Communications[211] November 18–21, 2025 616 (LV) ± 3.7% 38% 41% 22%
Rosetta Stone Communications (R)[212] October 23–25, 2025 637 (LV) ± 3.9% 31% 45% 24%
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 41% 47% 12%
45%[l] 47% 8%
Close

Haley Stevens vs. Mike Rogers

Aggregate polls

More information Source of poll aggregation, Dates administered ...
Source of poll aggregation Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Haley
Stevens (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other/
Undecided[z]
Margin
270toWin[184] July 1–1, 2026 July 13, 2026 44.3% 43.0% 12.7% Stevens +1.3%
Race to the WH[186] through June 30, 2026 July 13, 2026 44.8% 43.5% 11.7% Stevens +1.3%
RealClearPolitics[187] April 28 – June 30, 2026 July 13, 2026 44.0% 43.5% 12.5% Stevens +0.5%
Average 44.4% 43.3% 12.3% Stevens +1.1%
Close
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Haley
Stevens (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other Undecided
Quantus Insights (R)[193] June 29–30, 2026 947 (LV) ± 3.3% 45% 44% 3% 8%
Data for Progress (D)[247][M] June 15–22, 2026 709 (LV) ± 4.0% 45% 46% 9%
Zenith Research (D)[248][N] June 11–14, 2026 602 (LV) ± 4.0% 43% 42% 13%
Mitchell Research & Communications[249][D] June 11–13, 2026 827 (LV) ± 3.4% 41% 45% 13%
TIPP Insights (R)[202][F] May 20–23, 2026 1,456 (RV) ± 2.7% 45% 38% 6%[y] 11%
1,163 (LV) ± 3.0% 48% 41% 5%[aa] 6%
Mitchell Research[251][D] May 1–7, 2026 607 (LV) ± 6.0% 39% 42% 19%
Glengariff Group[252][G] April 28 – May 1, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 44% 15%
44%[l] 44% 11%
Emerson College[210] January 24–25, 2026 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 47% 42% 11%
Glengariff Group[253][C] January 2–6, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 47%[l] 42% 11%
44% 44% 12%
Mitchell Research & Communications[211] November 18–21, 2025 616 (LV) ± 3.7% 40% 42% 18%
EPIC-MRA[254] November 6–11, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 44% 42% 14%
Rosetta Stone Communications (R)[212] October 23–25, 2025 637 (LV) ± 3.9% 40% 47% 13%
Normington Petts (D)[255][256][O] June 12–16, 2025 700 (LV) ± 3.7% 47% 45% 8%
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 45% 44% 11%
49%[l] 43% 8%
Target Insyght[257][D] March 3–6, 2025 600 (V) ± 4.0% 35% 41% 24%
Close
Hypothetical polling

Mallory McMorrow vs. Mike Rogers

Aggregate polls

More information Source of poll aggregation, Dates administered ...
Source of poll aggregation Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Mallory
McMorrow (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other/
Undecided[ab]
Margin
270toWin[184] May 20 – June 30, 2026 July 1, 2026 43.5% 44.0% 12.5% Rogers +0.5%
Race to the WH[186] through June 30, 2026 July 2, 2026 43.4% 44.2% 12.4% Rogers +0.8%
RealClearPolitics[187] April 28 – June 30, 2026 July 2, 2026 42.8% 43.3% 13.9% Rogers +0.5%
Average 43.2% 43.8% 13.0% Rogers +0.6%
Close
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Mallory
McMorrow (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other Undecided
Quantus Insights (R)[193] June 29–30, 2026 947 (LV) ± 3.3% 44% 45% 3% 8%
Zenith Research (D)[248][N] June 11–14, 2026 602 (LV) ± 4.0% 44% 42% 13%
Mitchell Research & Communications[249][D] June 11–13, 2026 827 (LV) ± 3.4% 41% 47% 12%
TIPP Insights (R)[202][F] May 20–23, 2026 1,456 (RV) ± 2.7% 42% 39% 6%[y] 13%
1,163 (LV) ± 3.0% 45% 42% 5%[aa] 8%
Mitchell Research[251][D] May 1–7, 2026 607 (LV) ± 6.0% 41% 43% 16%
Glengariff Group[252][G] April 28 – May 1, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 41% 43% 16%
43%[l] 43% 14%
Emerson College[210] January 24–25, 2026 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 46% 43% 11%
Glengariff Group[253][C] January 2–6, 2026 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 46%[l] 43% 11%
42% 46% 12%
Mitchell Research & Communications[211] November 18–21, 2025 616 (LV) ± 3.7% 38% 44% 19%
EPIC-MRA[254] November 6–11, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 43% 42% 15%
Rosetta Stone Communications (R)[212] October 23–25, 2025 637 (LV) ± 3.9% 39% 46% 15%
Normington Petts (D)[255][256][O] June 12–16, 2025 700 (LV) ± 3.7% 44% 48% 8%
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 42% 46% 12%
46%[l] 44% 10%
Close

Haley Stevens vs. Bill Huizenga

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Haley
Stevens (D)
Bill
Huizenga (R)
Other /
Undecided
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 45% 39% 16%
48%[l] 39% 13%
Close

Abdul El-Sayed vs. Bill Huizenga

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Abdul
El-Sayed (D)
Bill
Huizenga (R)
Other /
Undecided
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 41% 41% 18%
44%[l] 41% 15%
Close

Mallory McMorrow vs. Bill Huizenga

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Mallory
McMorrow (D)
Bill
Huizenga (R)
Other /
Undecided
Glengariff Group[215][G] May 5–8, 2025 600 (RV) ± 4.0% 41% 41% 18%
45%[l] 40% 15%
Close

Dana Nessel vs. Mike Rogers

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Dana
Nessel (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other /
Undecided
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 688 (LV) ± 3.7% 45% 44% 11%
Close

Dana Nessel vs. Tudor Dixon

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Dana
Nessel (D)
Tudor
Dixon (R)
Other /
Undecided
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 688 (LV) ± 3.7% 45% 45% 10%
Close

Pete Buttigieg vs. Mike Rogers

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Pete
Buttigieg (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other /
Undecided
Target Insyght[257][D] March 3–6, 2025 600 (V) ± 4.0% 46% 44% 10%
EPIC-MRA[258] February 3–8, 2025 600 (V) ± 4.0% 41% 47% 12%
Close

Gretchen Whitmer vs. Brian Posthumus

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Gretchen
Whitmer (D)
Brian
Posthumus (R)
Other /
Undecided
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 688 (LV) ± 3.7% 47% 41% 12%
Close

Gretchen Whitmer vs. Mike Rogers

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Gretchen
Whitmer (D)
Mike
Rogers (R)
Other /
Undecided
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 688 (LV) ± 3.7% 47% 44% 9%
Target Insyght[257][D] March 3–6, 2025 600 (V) ± 4.0% 42% 41% 17%
Close

Gretchen Whitmer vs. Peter Meijer

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Gretchen
Whitmer (D)
Peter
Meijer (R)
Other /
Undecided
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 688 (LV) ± 3.7% 46% 40% 14%
Close

Gretchen Whitmer vs. Tudor Dixon

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[j]
Margin
of error
Gretchen
Whitmer (D)
Tudor
Dixon (R)
Other /
Undecided
Mitchell Research[216][D] March 13, 2025 688 (LV) ± 3.7% 47% 46% 7%
Close

Notes

  1. Bonior was the majority whip from 1991 to 1995 and minority whip from 1995 to 2002
  2. $3,287 of this total has been self-funded by Howard
  3. $1.5 million of this total was transferred from Stevens' House campaign accounts
  4. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  5. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  6. Rachel Howard with 1%; Travis Zollner with 0%
  7. Among "definite voters"
  8. Travis Zollner with 3%; Rachel Howard with 0%
  9. "Someone else" with 5%; Rachel Howard with 2%; Travis Zollner with 0%
  10. Joe Tate with 1%
  11. Joe Tate with 4%
  12. Dana Nessel with 13%; Mallory McMorrow with 6%; Hillary Scholten with 3%
  13. Both the national and state chapters endorsed Rogers
  14. $48,669 of this total has been self-funded by Scott
  15. Kent Benham and Andrew Kamal with 2%; Frederick Heurtebise and Genevieve Peters Scott with 1%
  16. Peter Meijer with 8%; Kevin Rinke with 4%; Bryan Posthumus with 2%; Jonathon Lindsey with 0%
  17. The Economist's prediction model uses unconventional terminology. For the purpose of equivalency, their "Very Likely" ratings are formatted as a "Likely" rating while "Likely" ratings are formatted as a "Lean" rating.
  18. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  19. "Someone else" with 7%
  20. "Someone else" with 6%
  21. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  22. "Someone else" with 5%
  23. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.

Partisan clients

  1. Poll commissioned by Fighting for Michigan, a pro-El-Sayed super PAC
  2. Poll sponsored by American Priorities, which supports El-Sayed
  3. Poll conducted for The Detroit News, which supports Stevens, and WDIV-TV
  4. Poll conducted for MIRS News
  5. Poll sponsored by El-Sayed's campaign
  6. Poll sponsored by League of American Workers
  7. Poll sponsored by The Detroit Regional Chamber
  8. Poll sponsored by Zeteo and Drop Site News
  9. Poll sponsored by McMorrow's campaign
  10. Poll commissioned by Public First Action
  11. Poll sponsored by Stevens's campaign
  12. Poll commissioned by First Principles Digital PAC, which supports Rogers
  13. Poll sponsored by the Working Families Party, which supports El-Sayed
  14. Poll commissioned by Common Defense, which supports El-Sayed
  15. Poll sponsored by Yes Michigan Super PAC

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI