Talk:2003 Pacific typhoon season

When adding articles, I've been mentioning tropical depression, tropical storm, and typhoon status being achieved when JMA made the upgrade. The problem is what to do for super typhoons. Technically, since JMA uses a 10-minute average sustained wind, their maximum sustained winds are a bit lower than the 1-minute average used by JTWC. I've been using JTWC for super typhoon status similar to what I've seen used in other articles...but am beginning to question this philosophy since they are not a regional warning center like Japan. What do you all think? Thegreatdr 01:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware the reasoning for the JTWC was when these articles were being created that was the source that was used. I don't think it is correct, but there's inertia against changing things now. As we have become more aware we have realised the problems this causes, for instance with Cyclone Monica the JTWC data didn't merely disagree with the BoM on "sustained winds" but on central pressure too.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

We deal with this problem in the NWS as well. Technically, we have to use the JMA information when available since they're a designated tropical cyclone warning center and JTWC is not. JTWC is just for U.S. Navy use and no longer has the ability to name tropical cyclones as of a few years ago, so I doubt they can be realistically used. Thegreatdr 15:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

One thing I'm less clear on is what happens with older storms, Typhoon Tip for example. There are subtle differences between the JTWC and JMA best tracks, but when Tip occured the JTWC was the responsible body. Is the JMA best track the official one? I have a feeling the only correct solution is to not use JTWC data at all if JMA data exists for recent seasons, and depending on the official status in the past the same story. (Ditto the Southern Hemisphere...)--Nilfanion (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

I think that makes sense, for the most part. Realize that JMA uses a 10-minute wind average though, so their wind speeds appear lower, even if their 10 minute sustained wind value is equivalent to the JWTC/NWS 1-minute maximum sustained wind. They will rarely, if ever, appear to "reach" the magic 130 kt maximum sustained wind that is used to declare a system a "super typhoon." The conversion from 10 min to 1 min winds is a 14% increase. Thegreatdr 21:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

That windspeed reference is very useful IMO. Actually what I was referring to is more that they disagree on pressure. For example at Typhoon Imbudo was assessed to be at 945 by the JMA and 910 by the JTWC at 2003-07-21 0000 UTC. These sorts of variations are typical from what I see and there is also subtle differences in the location. The question is for an older season, say 1980, is the JMA best track or the JTWC best track that is authoritative?--Nilfanion (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

For now, we're probably safe with JTWC before 1999. There is a movement to do a Pacific tropical cyclone reanalysis, but it will require significant coordination between ALL the western Pacific warning centers. It will take years to accomplish, perhaps a decade. We're closing in on 10 years of the Atlantic Basin's reanalysis. Thegreatdr 22:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Typhoon Committee season summary - it has a damage/deaths breakdown.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• predictions from TSR --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

This should be a start class. íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 20:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

No, it should be an FA class. However at this time it is clearly a stub, it needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

I've added all the storm names in to the article, now all they need are storm summaries, which I've started. Then it will be a start class. From there, I'll try to get track maps from Jdorje and storm pics. íslenska hurikein #12_(samtal) 22:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

It seems we're still missing at least 2, possibly 9, systems. I added some details to the systems that had little or nothing to their summary. I'll look around for the others. Thegreatdr 18:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind. The missing named storms were gone due to a reference coding error. Oops. Changed class from stub to start. Thegreatdr 18:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/shownh.php3?img_id=11154
  • In 2003 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 07:34:55, 404 Not Found
  • In 2003 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-11 06:16:00, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/shownh.php3?img_id=11736
  • In 2003 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 07:34:56, 404 Not Found
  • In 2003 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-11 06:16:11, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/shownh.php3?img_id=11831
  • In 2003 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 07:34:56, 404 Not Found
  • In 2003 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-11 06:16:20, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://web.kma.go.kr/eng/wea/wea_03_01.jsp
  • In 1950–56 Pacific typhoon seasons on 2011-05-25 03:26:39, 404 Not Found
  • In 1973 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 04:34:38, 404 Not Found
  • In 1987 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 05:39:58, 404 Not Found
  • In 1999 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 06:42:41, 404 Not Found
  • In 2004 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-25 07:47:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2006 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-26 02:11:40, 404 Not Found
  • In 2007 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-05-27 15:15:42, 404 Not Found
  • In 1950–56 Pacific typhoon seasons on 2011-06-04 17:33:47, 404 Not Found
  • In 1959 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-04 18:45:09, 404 Not Found
  • In 1957 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-04 20:07:59, 404 Not Found
  • In 1959 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-04 21:56:49, 404 Not Found
  • In 1964 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 13:01:20, 404 Not Found
  • In 1969 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 14:19:18, 404 Not Found
  • In 1973 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 15:44:21, 404 Not Found
  • In 1973 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 20:35:03, 404 Not Found
  • In 1977 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-06 21:57:12, 404 Not Found
  • In 1978 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 00:33:49, 404 Not Found
  • In 1980 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 01:47:46, 404 Not Found
  • In 1982 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 03:03:12, 404 Not Found
  • In 1984 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 04:04:13, 404 Not Found
  • In 1985 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 11:48:57, 404 Not Found
  • In 1990 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-07 23:58:35, 404 Not Found
  • In 1992 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-08 01:39:20, 404 Not Found
  • In 1995 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-08 03:16:18, 404 Not Found
  • In 1999 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-08 23:40:04, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-10 05:44:57, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-10 07:40:29, 404 Not Found
  • In 2002 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-11 04:45:07, 404 Not Found
  • In 2003 Pacific typhoon season on 2011-06-11 06:16:30, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2003 Pacific typhoon season's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ATCR":

• From Tropical Storm Linfa (2003): Furze, Peter; Preble, Amanda (2003). 2003 Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (PDF). JTWC Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (Report). Pearl Harbor, Hawaii: Joint Typhoon Warning Center/United States Naval Pacific Meteorology and Oceanography Center. pp. 82–91. Retrieved 6 October 2013.
• From Typhoon Krovanh (2003): Furze, Peter; Preble, Amanda (2003). 2003 Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (PDF). JTWC Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (Report). Pearl Harbor, Hawaii: Joint Typhoon Warning Center/United States Naval Pacific Meteorology and Oceanography Center. pp. 174–187. Retrieved 15 November 2013.
• From Tropical Storm Morakot (2003): Furze, Peter; Preble, Amanda (2003). 2003 Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (PDF). JTWC Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (Report). Pearl Harbor, Hawaii: Joint Typhoon Warning Center/United States Naval Pacific Meteorology and Oceanography Center. pp. 148–157. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
• From Typhoon Kujira (2003): Furze, Peter; Preble, Amanda (2003). 2003 Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (PDF). JTWC Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (Report). Pearl Harbor, Hawaii: Joint Typhoon Warning Center/United States Naval Pacific Meteorology and Oceanography Center. Retrieved 6 October 2013.
• From Tropical Storm Koni: Furze, Peter; Preble, Amanda (2003). 2003 Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (PDF). JTWC Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (Report). Pearl Harbor, Hawaii: Joint Typhoon Warning Center/United States Naval Pacific Meteorology and Oceanography Center. pp. 118–131. Retrieved 5 November 2013.

Reference named "JMA":

• From 2007 Pacific typhoon season: http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/Besttracks/bst2007.txt
• From Tokyo: "気象庁 / 平年値（年・月ごとの値）". Japan Meteorological Agency. Retrieved June 24, 2013.
• From Tropical Storm Morakot (2003): Regional Specialized Meteorological Center – Tokyo (2003). Annual Report on Activities of the RSMC Tokyo – Typhoon Center 2003 (PDF) (Report). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Meteorological Agency. p. 31. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
• From Tropical Storm Linfa (2003): Regional Specialized Meteorological Center – Tokyo (2003). Annual Report on Activities of the RSMC Tokyo – Typhoon Center 2003 (PDF) (Report). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Meteorological Agency. p. 26. Retrieved 6 October 2013.
• From Typhoon Krovanh (2003): Regional Specialized Meteorological Center – Tokyo (2003). Annual Report on Activities of the RSMC Tokyo –Typhoon Center 2003 (PDF) (Report). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Meteorological Agency. p. 35. Retrieved 15 November 2013.
• From Tropical Storm Koni: Regional Specialized Meteorological Center – Tokyo (2003). Annual Report on Activities of the RSMC Tokyo – Typhoon Center 2003 (PDF) (Report). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Meteorological Agency. p. 30. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
• From Typhoon Kujira (2003): Regional Specialized Meteorological Center – Tokyo (2003). Annual Report on Activities of the RSMC Tokyo – Typhoon Center 2003 (PDF) (Report). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Meteorological Agency. Retrieved 6 October 2013.
• From 1971 Pacific typhoon season: "Climatology of Tropical Cyclones". Japan Meteorological Agency. Retrieved 2008-03-07.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2003 Pacific typhoon season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 20:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello User:TheAustinMan! I am going to review this Good article nomination of yours. My issues are listed below.--12george1 (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

• "Though the season ran year-round, the first storm to develop was Yanyan west of the Marshall Islands on January 15." - I'm not sure I like the wording of this sentence. Was the first storm named "Yanyan west of the Marshall Islands on January 15."? Also, what's with the "Though" at the beginning? Basically the first part is proved by the second part. My suggestion: "The season ran year-round, with the first storm, Yanyan, developing west of the Marshall Islands on January 15."
  •  Done - Reworded to the suggested wording. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "Maemi was also the most intense tropical cyclone of the season with a minimum barometric pressure of 910 mbar (hPa; 26.87 inHg)." - Mbar, hPa, inHg. What's all of that? :P
  •  Done - Linked the meteorological abbreviated jargon. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "Pacific basin are assigned a name by the Tokyo Typhoon Center." - Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the Joint Typhoon Warning Center that assigns names? If you do replace the Tokyo Typhoon Center with the Joint Typhoon Warning Center, remember to wikilink it and include the abbreviation (JTWC), since it goes unexplained later in the article.
  • ✗ Not done - I'm pretty sure the JMA does. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Ok. Since you are not going to wikilink Joint Typhoon Warning Center, then put it here instead, "The JTWC also issued warnings on storms within the basin,".--12george1 (talk) 21:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• The number of typhoons and intense TCs in the TSR forecasts table do not match the infobox.
  • ✗ Not done - The TSR based their verification on what the JTWC tracked, so I added a note. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "In 2003, the JMA monitored 21 tropical cyclones of at least tropical storm intensity; of those, 14 reached typhoon intensity. [...] (PAGASA) monitored three additional cyclones of at least tropical storm intensity that were not monitored by the JMA.[1][14][15]" - I'm confused here despite the fact that I am a WPTC member. :P I counted 22 TCs that reached tropical storm intensity. Since there were 24 named system overall (21 official, 3 unofficial), wouldn't that leave only two additional cyclones at tropical storm intensity that weren't monitored by JMA?
  •  Done - The timeline is based off of the JMA, which did not consider Batibot, Lakay, or Zigzag as tropical storms. Lakay was incorrectly labeled as a TS on the timeline, so I fixed that. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "Typhoon Etau earlier in the month made landfall in Japan, resulting in 17 deaths.[15][21]" - Wikilink landfall
  •  Done - Linked. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "January 18 with 1-minute sustained winds of 60 mph (97 km/h)" - Switch the order of the units.
  •  Done - Switched. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "depression on April 9 well removed form any landmasses." - Typo
  •  Done - Nah, it formed several landmasses. Fixed TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "several hours until less conducive atmospheric conditions slightly" - Ditto
  • ✗ Not done - Not sure where the typo is here. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Shouldn't "conducive" be "conductive"?--12george1 (talk) 21:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "A tropical depression developed on August 2, and gradually intensified while moving to the northwest, becoming a tropical storm on August 3 and a typhoon a day later." - No location mentioned. Did this TD happen to form near Antarctica?!? :P
  •  Done - Southeast of Guam. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• Similar issue in Krovanh's section. No location is mentioned until the fifth sentence.
  •  Done - East of Chuuk state. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "The passage of the typhoon caused surface chlorophyll-a concentration in the ocean to increase 30-fold." - I think you should wikilink Chlorophyll a
  •  Done - Linked. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• "On September 5, former Hurricane Jimena crossed the international date line into the basin." ---> "On September 5, former Hurricane Jimena crossed the International Date Line into the basin. "
  •  Done - Fixed. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 21:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• Alright, that should be it. I look forward to passing this article. :) --12george1 (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
• Well, great job TheAustinMan. :) I am now going to pass this article and list it as a Good Article. Congratulations,--12george1 (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2003 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/orders/IPS-0FF500DC-E840-48A1-89B5-CB059E6A6E53.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://kidlat.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/cab/track305.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213225749/http://portal.worldwaterforum5.org/wwf5/en-us/worldregions/Asia-Pacific/Northeast%20Asia%20Sub-Region/Consultation%20Library/27Sep08_Northeast%20Mt_Korea.pdf to http://portal.worldwaterforum5.org/wwf5/en-us/worldregions/Asia-Pacific/Northeast%20Asia%20Sub-Region/Consultation%20Library/27Sep08_Northeast%20Mt_Korea.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029185710/http://eng.nema.go.kr/sub/cms3/3_2.asp to http://eng.nema.go.kr/sub/cms3/3_2.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gcportal.guycarp.com/portal/extranet/popup/pdf/GCPub/GC%20Typhoon%20Maemi%20report.pdf?vid=1
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://kidlat.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/cab/track323.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2000/summ9912.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/tcp/documents/TCP-23EDITION2012.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100107224630/http://web.kma.go.kr/eng/wea/wea_03_01.jsp to http://web.kma.go.kr/eng/wea/wea_03_01.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs and sections. Should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:00, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Nominator: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 00:22, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2003 Pacific typhoon season/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GiftedIceCream (talk · contribs) 19:48, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this soon.

• Tropical Storms formed in the entire west Pacific basin are assigned a name by the Tokyo Typhoon Center. Tropical depressions in this basin monitored by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) have the "W" suffix added to their number. Tropical depressions that enter or form in the Philippine area of responsibility are assigned a name by the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration or PAGASA. This can often result in the same storm having two names.[1]→Tropical storms formed in the entire northwest Pacific basin are assigned a name by the Tokyo Typhoon Center. Tropical depressions in this basin monitored by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) have the "W" suffix added to their number. Tropical depressions that enter or form in the Philippine area of responsibility are assigned a name by the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA). This can often result in the same storm having two names.[1]

• Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Intense TCs?

• What do you mean? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• In the table, a column says "Intense TCs" which was never defined.

• I realized that this was a substitute for major hurricanes, as in a Category 3 with 1-min sustained winds. I updated and fixed the table. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:16, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Consortium issued an extended range forecast for the typhoon season, Extended range?

• Removed "extended range". ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• The group was very accurate in their forecasts, with their April and August forecasts being the most accurate.[2] How were they accurate?
• Why aren't the CityUHK forecasts in the table?
• It should be mentioned that JTWC is unofficial somewhere.

• Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• ACE should be linked

• Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• PAGASA is already linked.

• Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• This can often result in the same storm having two names.[ You added a bracket... GiftedIceCream 19:04, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

• D'oh! Sorry it's been a busy week and I haven't had much time to get to this. Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• The Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) monitored three additional cyclones of at least tropical storm intensity that were not monitored by the JMA.[1][15][16] This is unclear. Doesn't JMA still monitor tropical depressions?

• I fixed this, it was two tropical cyclones that were not given warnings by the JMA. One was a TD and one was a TS tracked only by PAGASA. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• The summary of the season in season summary is just 32 words longer than the one in the lead.

• Great point. I removed the paragraph from the season summary and integrated it into the lead. That also helped cut down on the article's overall length. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Finishing over the weekend. GiftedIceCream 19:40, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

• The JMA upgraded the depression to Tropical Storm Yanyan on January 18, e stimating peak 10 minute winds of 65 km/h (40 mph). typo

• Yea, I should really do more copyediting in the future. Sorry for the minor stuff like this that you had to read through. Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Around that time, the storm stalled east of the Mariana Islands and curve sharply northeastward into a less favorable environment.→Around that time, the storm stalled east of the Mariana Islands and curved sharply northeastward into a less favorable environment.

• Ugh, fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• The JMA downgraded Yanyan to tropical depression at 1200 UTC on January 20. Seems like its missing a word

• Status = fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Afterward, the typhoon's track and intensity fluctuated as it passed east of the Philippines and Taiwan, with eventual wweakening as it turned to the north. typo. Also track fluctuated?

• I feel like this is a tyop that was added over the years. Sigh, fixed. I removed "track and" to simplify it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Shortly after developing, Kujira caused two fatalities in Pohnpei in addition to minor agricultural and infrastructural damage;[17] similar effects were felt in Guam.[27] Several days later, the typhoon prompted cyclone warnings and other precautionary measures in the Philippines after forecasts indicated the potential for strong winds and rain.[28][29] A clearer date should be used here.

• I removed the Philippines portion, as there were ultimately minimal effects there. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Overall, despite its distance away from land and weak intensity at the time of its sole landfall, distance away from land at the time of its sole landfall?

• I removed this. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• The UTC times should be consistant. Some use 0000 utc while others use 00:00 utc.

• I added a note, and removed most of the UTC in the article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

• Overall, Linfa caused roughly $28.2 million in damage, much of which occurred in Japan, You never specified the damage totals in Japan.
• maximum sustained winds of 95 km/h (59 mph), should be rounded to 60.
  • Side note: Remember to round the sustained wind speeds to the nearest 5.
• There are numerous MOS:GEOLINK violations in the article.
• Koni dissipates over Laos on July 23. past tense.

• Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• You refer to the typhoons as "typhoon", "cyclone" and storm. Make them consistent.

GiftedIceCream 18:06, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink I'm not done with the review yet, but you could take a look at these comments. GiftedIceCream 18:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

@GiftedIceCream: thanks for the review so far. I admit that I didn't do too much work on the article since I worked on it back in 2014. That's why the article is in a lot worse shape than a lot of other articles I've done. I did a few things, but will take some time over the next few days to address everything. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

• Overall damage in China was estimated at ¥2.3 billion (CNY, US$277 million), and across Guangdong, the typhoon killed 40 people.[74] Should be a deaths total for China.
• Typhoon Maemi formed on September 4 from the monsoon trough in the western Pacific Ocean.[14]→A tropical depression formed on September 4 from the monsoon trough in the western Pacific Ocean.[14], or something like that.
• producing the fourth lowest pressure on record in Japan after a pressure of 912 mbar (26.9 inHg) was recorded.[23] After the pressure was recorded?
• (the only time this name was used, as it was retired the following year). this is redundant to the retirement section.
• Why does Tropical Depression 19W have their own section?
• Tropical Depression 19W developed on October 12 after an extratropical storm produced an area of convection. Infobox says ten. The entire section seems to be based of of JTWC
• The above two ditto for TD22W
• Moving westwardm Nepartak made landfall on northern Samar Island in the Philippines as a tropical storm on November 13. typo
• It crossed the island chain and emerged into the South China, where it quickly re-intensified. Did it ever weaken?
• Many storms are missing minimum pressure.
• Typhoon Lupit formed on November 18 from the monsoon trough to the west of the Marshall Islands.[13][14] Should be tropical depression.
• The image of the last TD is in the wrong place.
• The other systems is missing many TDs
• unnamed tropical cyclones are not included. Not sure what that means.
• Storms entering from the Central Pacific only include their information while in the western Pacific, and are noted with an asterisk *. looks a little awkward.
• Many of the TDs in the table are unsourced.
• None of the sources I randomly checked have any problems, though I might be missing some.

Ping when done. GiftedIceCream 19:31, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@GiftedIceCream: can't believe I'm saying this, but I need to withdraw. I didn't realize how much the article has degraded over time, this as well as the storm sub-articles. For Linfa, I tried finding the source for the Japan damage total. It might've existed at some point, but even the Digital Typhoon website is gone, which was the source for a lot of the Linfa article (and many others). And that's not the only source that's dead, so is a lot of the rest of the article. So a lot of the sources might not be verifiable/accessible. I also realize that a lot of work is needed to update the article to basic modern standards (everything being rounded, other warning centers, balancing the met history with the amount of info that's actually verifiable). I hate to do it, since it will cause the 2003 good topic to be removed. But I just don't have the time to update everything. Thank you for reviewing the article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:28, 17 May 2026 (UTC)