Talk:Anne Frank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anne Frank article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| Anne Frank is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 7, 2005. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Category:Ileists
She often referred to herself in the third person like 28th September 1942 in the B version of the diary; 'I will show them that Anne Frank is no pushover'. 2001:BB6:7AF0:2058:B4A3:7CB7:B039:24BF (talk) 12:15, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
FRankiethegoateater (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Jonah Kudlawitz, a young Jewish boy, was the name of her cellmate.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Day Creature (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/was-anne-frank-betrayed/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 05:09, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2026
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The section New theories about Anne Frank's arrest is largely uncited and contains POV-pushing and weasel words ("the highly credible possibility", "it is very likely", "it is reasonable to think"). I request a removal of all material which does not conform to Wikipedia's rules on verifiability and neutrality. ~2026-15352-75 (talk) 04:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Not done for now: I think you're right that the section needs to be re-written, there is however a source and I'm not sure it should be completely deleted. Could you provide a specific proposal for the text in change x to y format? ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 12:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

