Talk:Apple A17

Any proof that the A17 uses these core designs? 2601:602:9000:8F40:28D1:4F62:7EDC:29D2 (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

I currently cannot see or find any reliable sources that confirm this information, therefore the information currently listed on the wiki page is speculation. 2601:602:9000:8F40:28D1:4F62:7EDC:29D2 (talk) 05:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

“ In the 2022 film M3GAN, the titular artificially intelligent humanoid robot character features an A17 Bionic Fusion Chip.”

Source does not directly mention presence of an A17 chip, and seems to be a satire addition. Removal possible? 213.105.92.148 (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done This has been carried out. TwoGamer1000 (Edits) 18:56, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

It has been proposed in this section that Apple A17 be renamed and moved to Apple A17 ProApple A17 Pro. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

Apple A17 → Apple A17 ProApple A17 Pro – I would've thought it'd make sense for the A17 Pro chip to be listed at Apple A17 Pro, and for a while on September 12, 2023, it was at 'Apple A17 Pro', until a user named Brandon moved it back. He provided the following edit summary:

Rename for consistency with other Category:Apple silicon article names.

I feel like it would be right for the A17 Pro chip to be listed at 'Apple A17 Pro', especially since there was no standard A17 processor. TwoGamer1000 (Edits) 19:13, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• Support: per nom. Since there is no A17, there is no need for consistency with articles about A16 or A18. Titling this article A17 would mislead readers that there actually is an A17 chip. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 18:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
• Support as the original offender. I cannot remember my rationale in 2023 and TwoGamer1000's argument is persuasive. Brandon (talk) 03:37, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose: It doesn't match up with the current name, and the "Apple A17 Pro" is an uncommon name, and per WP:CRYSTALBALL. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 23:08, 10 April 2026 (UTC)