Wikiwand AI

Talk:KOZL-TV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Good articleKOZL-TV has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 15, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 28, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that less than a year after the owner of a Missouri TV station declared that "cancellation of a network affiliation is almost unheard of", his station's affiliation was canceled?
Close

Fair use rationale for Image:Ksfx.jpg

Image:Ksfx.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on KOZL-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KOZL-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KOZL-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:KOZL-TV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 17:23, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 23:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)


I will review this within a week or two! ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 23:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

  • @LunaEatsTuna: Do you still intend to review this, or should this be reset so someone else can pick it up? Z1720 (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Copyvio check

Passes, no concerns of any potential copyright infringement; any featured quotations are short excerpts, relevant and attributed (cited) correctly.

Spotcheck

Passes. I randomly selected and verified refs 6, 12, 13, 21, 22, 25, 43 and 44.

Prose
  • "build a third commercial TV station in Springfield" – I think you should write out Springfield, Missouri in full here. (Of course the section title is probably fine as is).
  • Wikilink VHF and UHF (as you do with other articles) upon their first mention in § KMTC: ABC for Springfield.
  • "Even where viewers had the capability to receive UHF stations, their UHF tuners—never before used—often did not work, Meyer later recalled" – if this is a claim rather than a fact, I think it should be worded differently than "Meyer later recalled".
  • "KOLR, owned by VHR Broadcasting, to pool personnel, advertising sales, production, and promotions and operations" – is promotions and operations really a single field?
The comments are short but the article (like all of your others) is really good. Anyways, over to you, you know the drill. Thank you once again for your patience with me. ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 22:51, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
@LunaEatsTuna Good call on the tuner sentence change. We are good to go. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 04:37, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
Thanks! Nice work on the changes; I am happy now to pass this wonderful article for GA status. Congrats! ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 20:26, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Zzz plant (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 819 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 04:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC).

    More information General: Article is new enough and long enough ...
    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Close
    More information Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems ...
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Close
    More information Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation ...
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Close
    QPQ: Done.
    Overall: Recently promoted GA. Hooks are interesting and verified by the sources. No copyvio detected. Nice work! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

    Related Articles

    Timelines

    Top Qs

    Fact Checks