Talk:Kulasekaram

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. 2 to 3 and no evidence going either way, so no consensus going either way. (closed by non-admin page mover) –Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley${\displaystyle \lor }$investigateᛅ} 14:13, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Kulasekaram → KulasekharamKulasekharam – The article intro uses one spelling while the main page title uses another. The official/most common English spelling should be standardized. Benjen1 (talk) 09:59, 10 June 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:59, 17 June 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. ⹃Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley${\displaystyle \lor }$investigateᛅ} 08:44, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support. It seems that Kulasekharam is indeed the more common name. But I haven't spent much time analyzing it. FromCzech (talk) 07:21, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. The Indian Census uses "Kulasekaram", which is a strong reliable source for place name spellings. Without a clear consensus among authoritative sources, the current title should stand.Pascuet (talk) 04:13, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose. No evidence that the proposed name is The official/most common English spelling as claimed by nom. I am guessing that by this they mean to claim that the proposed name is both official and common, but we have no evidence that it is either. Andrewa (talk) 09:50, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: After this RM closes, the article, the footer template it uses, and possibly other pages should be edited as needed to use the agreed name. Andrewa (talk) 09:57, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose, No evidence whatsoever has been provided, and the supporter even admits "I haven't spent much time analyzing it". - Arjayay (talk) 10:25, 3 July 2026 (UTC)