Talk:Parmigiana

Is the information about how Australia (informally) pronounces Parmigiana really a relevant piece of information to be included in the opening paragraph? Sure, it gets used a lot here but I'm sure the other several hundred million English speakers don't care. Should that be located somewhere else in the article or at all for that matter?

I can't stress enough that Parmi is informal. The Macquarie Australian English dictionary doesn't even list it as a pronunciation ^[1] and doesn't list 'parmi' at all ^[2]. It does refer to 'parma' which was in a previous edit but not in the current. ^[3] so perhaps that should be used instead? (when placed in an appropriate non-opening section).

Kaptainkruft (talk) 01:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Parmigiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140712164720/http://italianfood.about.com/od/beefbracioleetc/r/blr0229.htm to http://italianfood.about.com/od/beefbracioleetc/r/blr0229.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517151454/http://www.abc.com.py/edicion-impresa/suplementos/gastronomia/el-origen-de-la-milanesa-557404.html to http://www.abc.com.py/edicion-impresa/suplementos/gastronomia/el-origen-de-la-milanesa-557404.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

This article is invented nonsense, if you want a well laid out article on the subject read the actual Italian version. Just because there is a city with a similar name does not mean that is its origin. How basic can you be. Italian dialects have deep roots, does it not occur to you two words can share a common earlier origin? Where is the source saying this dish is from Parma? I live in Emilia, go to Parma, they'll laugh at you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.66.174.193 (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Jean-de-Nivelle, according to MOS:SECTLINK: "... a redirect can be created when the occasion arises." My edit is 100% correct. JacktheBrown (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Please see my reply at Talk:Italian cuisine. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 20:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

The article currently says Corrado's cookbook was published in 1786, that it used eggplant, and that it was baked.

There are two sources cited:

• Mediterranean Vegetables (2012): Corrado's cookbook was published in 1786, that it used eggplant, and that it was baked.
• La Cucina Italia (2020): Corrado's cookbook was published in 1733, that it used zucchini, not eggplant, and that it was baked.

A third source, not used:

• Naples at Table (1995): Corrado's cookbook was published in 1765, that it used eggplant, and "never mentions baking it".

This needs further investigation. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | contributions) 03:30, 9 July 2025 (UTC)